{"id":213624,"date":"2019-05-10T03:08:06","date_gmt":"2019-05-10T07:08:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=213624"},"modified":"2019-05-10T03:08:06","modified_gmt":"2019-05-10T07:08:06","slug":"feds-look-to-ease-requirements-for-fighter-jet-makers-after-u-s-complaints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/10\/feds-look-to-ease-requirements-for-fighter-jet-makers-after-u-s-complaints\/","title":{"rendered":"Feds look to ease requirements for fighter jet makers after U.S. complaints"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_213625\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-213625\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/640px-CF-18_cropped.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-213625\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/640px-CF-18_cropped.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/640px-CF-18_cropped.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/640px-CF-18_cropped-300x184.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-213625\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Royal Canadian Air Force CF-188 Hornet flies next to U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker assigned to the 340th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron, while his wingman refuels,\u00c2\u00a0March 4, 2015, over Iraq. The Hornets are striking Da&#8217;esh targets in support of Operation Inherent Resolve. (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=74333253\">U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Perry Aston\/RELEASED<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA &#8212; The federal government is planning to loosen its industrial requirements for fighter-jet makers in the $19-billion competition to replace Canada&#8217;s aging CF-18s.<\/p>\n<p>The planned modification follows recent U.S. complaints that the previous criteria violated Canada&#8217;s obligations as one of nine partner countries in the development of the F-35, one of the small handful of planes expected in the competition.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the proposed change has sparked complaints from some of the companies whose planes will be competing against the F-35, who say the new approach goes too far in the other direction.<\/p>\n<p>Canada has long required companies bidding on major defence contracts to commit to re-investing back into the country, with those unable to make such a contractual commitment seeing their bids tossed out.<\/p>\n<p>But in a presentation to companies on Thursday, the government said it plans to allow bids missing such a commitment in the fighter-jet competition &#8212; they will be just docked points in the assessment.<\/p>\n<p>The plan is intended to maximize the number of bids in the competition to buy 88 new jets while still aiming for the largest-possible economic spinoffs, a senior government official told The Canadian Press.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. had threatened not to enter the F-35 into the competition if the requirement wasn&#8217;t changed, noting that under the partnership agreement signed in 2006, companies in each member country instead compete for work.<\/p>\n<p>The threat was contained in a letter sent to the government from the head of the Pentagon&#8217;s F-35 office in December and published in a report from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>Canada has contributed roughly $500 million over the past 20 years toward developing the F-35, while Canadian companies have won nearly $1.5 billion in contracts associated with the stealth fighter. Canada will also be able to buy the plane for less than non-members.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed new process will see the government evaluate bids on a scale, with 60 per cent of the points based on the plane&#8217;s capability, 20 per cent on its full lifetime costs and the remaining 20 per cent on industrial benefits to Canada.<\/p>\n<p>Bidders can still guarantee that they will re-invest back into Canada if their jet wins the competition and get all 20 points &#8211; which is the likely approach for Boeing&#8217;s Super Hornet, Eurofighter&#8217;s Typhoon and Saab&#8217;s Gripen.<\/p>\n<p>But those that can&#8217;t make such a commitment will be asked to establish \u201cindustrial targets,\u201d lay out a plan for achieving those targets and sign a non-binding agreement promising to make all efforts to achieve them.<\/p>\n<p>The government will study those plans and assign points based on risk. This is the likely approach for Lockheed Martin and the F-35, which the U.S. has said could provide Canadian companies with billions in work over the next 50 years.<\/p>\n<p>The planned new approach has already stirred complaints from some of Lockheed Martin&#8217;s competitors, who question why the F-35 should get points if the company can&#8217;t guarantee re-investment back into Canada.<\/p>\n<p>There are also concerns about how the government will decide how risky plans to achieve \u201cindustrial targets\u201d actually are, with one industry source saying that question is entirely subjective.<\/p>\n<p>Bidders were also told Thursday that the actual launch of the competition has been delayed until mid-July. Government officials had previously said they hoped the starting gun would be fired by the end of the month.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA &#8212; The federal government is planning to loosen its industrial requirements for fighter-jet makers in the $19-billion competition to &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":213625,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-lee-berthiaume","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213624"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213624\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":213626,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213624\/revisions\/213626"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/213625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}