{"id":213284,"date":"2019-05-08T02:22:14","date_gmt":"2019-05-08T06:22:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=213284"},"modified":"2019-05-08T02:22:14","modified_gmt":"2019-05-08T06:22:14","slug":"snc-lavalin-execs-ponder-company-break-up-at-private-shareholder-luncheon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/08\/snc-lavalin-execs-ponder-company-break-up-at-private-shareholder-luncheon\/","title":{"rendered":"SNC-Lavalin execs ponder company break up at private shareholder luncheon"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
SNC-Lavalin said in an email that it \u201ccontinues to evaluate all possible scenarios to create maximum value for company shareholders.\u201d (Marc Bruxelle \/ Shutterstock.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MONTREAL \u2014 Executives at SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. continue to ponder a Plan B that could see the company break up ahead of a potential criminal conviction.<\/p>\n

David Taylor of Toronto-based Taylor Asset Management, a shareholder of SNC-Lavalin, said the embattled engineering and construction firm’s CEO and chief financial officer discussed spinning off assets \u2014 which could include U.K.-based WS Atkins \u2014 at a private luncheon hosted by TD Securities in Toronto.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey mentioned spinning off,\u201d Taylor said in an interview, referring to chief executive Neil Bruce and chief financial officer Sylvain Girard.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey’ve got great assets within that are being punished and their good assets aren’t being valued properly. So they sort of hypothetically talked about crystallizing that value, and the only way you can really do that is to sell,\u201d Taylor said.<\/p>\n

The sitdown last Friday, first reported by the Globe and Mail, came a day after the company announced plans to wind down its operations in 15 countries and reported a $17-million loss in its latest quarter, precipitating a stock drop to new 10-year lows over the past few days.<\/p>\n

The discussion floated an alternative to a possible plan that SNC-Lavalin laid out for federal prosecutors last fall where the company would split in two, move its offices to the United States within a year and eventually eliminate its Canadian workforce if it didn’t get a deal to avoid criminal prosecution.<\/p>\n

Confidential documents, part of a PowerPoint presentation obtained by The Canadian Press in March, described something called \u201cPlan B\u201d \u2014 what Montreal-based SNC might have to do if it can’t convince the government to grant a so-called remediation agreement to avoid criminal proceedings in a fraud and corruption case related to projects in Libya.<\/p>\n

SNC-Lavalin said in an email that it \u201ccontinues to evaluate all possible scenarios to create maximum value for company shareholders.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have publicly made it clear for several months that the company has a fiduciary obligation to its shareholders and employees to have a Plan B in place, retaining the services of external legal and financial advisers to help develop different scenarios for consideration,\u201d the company stated.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat said, no decision has yet been made, so it is premature to comment further on the subject.\u201d<\/p>\n

SNC-Lavalin bought British engineering giant WS Atkins in 2017, which now has more than 10,000 employees in Britain.<\/p>\n

SNC hopes to sell the bulk of its 16.77 per cent stake in Highway 407 to the OMERS pension plan, with a deal expected to close before the end of June.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MONTREAL \u2014 Executives at SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. continue to ponder a Plan B that could see the company break up …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":212553,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213284"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213284\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":213285,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213284\/revisions\/213285"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/212553"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}