{"id":212909,"date":"2019-05-05T21:15:28","date_gmt":"2019-05-06T01:15:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=212909"},"modified":"2019-05-05T21:15:28","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T01:15:28","slug":"no-pre-shaded-ballots-for-may-13-polls-comelec","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/05\/no-pre-shaded-ballots-for-may-13-polls-comelec\/","title":{"rendered":"No pre-shaded ballots for May 13 polls: Comelec"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_212914\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-212914\" style=\"width: 1121px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-212914\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1121\" height=\"625\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot.png 1121w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot-300x167.png 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot-768x428.png 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/ballot-1024x571.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1121px) 100vw, 1121px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-212914\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The video also alleged that the hidden marks can only be seen using UV lamps. (Screenshot from viral <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rene.andrew\/videos\/10220309952205459\/\">Video: Rene Andrew\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; An official of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) on Thursday said there is no truth to allegations that official ballots for the May 13 mid-term elections have been pre-shaded.<\/p>\n<p>Comelec Executive Director Jose Tolentino Jr. denied claims that the ballots have been marked using ultraviolet (UV) inks, making them invisible to the naked eye.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe tested. The marks using UV inks weren\u2019t read by the VCM, which looks for a black ink or those that are always visible so to speak,\u201d he said in a press briefing.<\/p>\n<p>Tolentino said there is a video circulating on social media, claiming that the ballots were marked by UV inks, making them pre-shaded but hidden.<\/p>\n<p>The video also alleged that the hidden marks can only be seen using UV lamps.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe ballots have QR codes, serial number, and precinct assignment. It was obviously a staged video because it doesn\u2019t have those features. It was a waste because they already staged a video yet they used the wrong ballot prop,\u201d Tolentino said.<\/p>\n<p>He noted that those behind such activities will be held accountable.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOnce we know who they are, yes, of course,\u201d the Comelec official added.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Tolentino said the three source codes of the remaining components of the automated election system (AES) have been deposited in escrow with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, as required by the Poll Automation Law.<\/p>\n<p>The codes are the Operating System (OS) image rebuild for the Consolidation and Canvassing System (CCS), Transmission Router, and the Domain Name Server (DNS) Janitor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo be escrowed are the remaining source codes that were reviewed and certified by our international certification entity and were also reviewed by our local source code reviewers,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo one have found or said that they found that there is any malicious code embedded in the source codes,\u201d Tolentino added.<\/p>\n<p>The source codes for the Election Management System, CCS, and the vote counting machines were first deposited last February.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; An official of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) on Thursday said there is no truth to allegations that official &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":212914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ferdinand-patinio","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212909"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212909\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":212916,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212909\/revisions\/212916"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/212914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}