{"id":210798,"date":"2019-04-21T03:45:55","date_gmt":"2019-04-21T07:45:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=210798"},"modified":"2019-04-21T03:45:55","modified_gmt":"2019-04-21T07:45:55","slug":"trump-sours-on-mueller-report-after-initial-upbeat-view","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/04\/21\/trump-sours-on-mueller-report-after-initial-upbeat-view\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump sours on Mueller report after initial upbeat view"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_178806\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-178806\" style=\"width: 2048px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-178806\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2048\" height=\"1365\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/32744156000_30304b5a0d_k-20x13.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2048px) 100vw, 2048px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-178806\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: President of the United States Donald J. Trump at CPAC 2017 February 24th 2017 by Michael Vadon (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/80038275@N00\/32744156000\/in\/photolist-RTumMN-24cJg64-SpAb5Q-SthHvX-SrihxY-S6fehU-SBpYzJ-237UrjS-24cJfK4-ExzD76-237UqpL-28PqR4X-24cJeEi-28PqRaP-2a8eKwN-LAY1rb-27mQPZe-WVEtyg-28JKoQH-yPyPh7-WkfMUG-YFXaMi-LAXZHN-27mQQBM-24mbcft-FHDY8r-K5MVyn-27mQPfD-27mQLKt-27DfsPJ-28JKprT-25YJV5b-21ZZdBz-Nb1pSb-25YJW9f-25YJVhL-P12pE3-2a8eJFu-2a8eKY9-27rEHc1-2a8eKUm-2a8eL4E-27rEG1d-Lry3fc-N55Muq-Lry3n6-2a8eKDG-27rEHwu-27rEGoh-Lry2tc\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/80038275@N00\/\">Michael Vadon\/Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2013 President Donald Trump is lashing out at current and former aides who co-operated with special counsel Robert Mueller&#8217;s investigation, insisting the deeply unflattering picture they painted of him and the White House was \u201ctotal bullshit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a series of angry tweets from Palm Beach, Florida, Trump laced into those who, under oath, had shared with Mueller their accounts of how Trump tried numerous times to squash or influence the investigation and portrayed the White House as infected by a culture of lies, deceit and deception.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cStatements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated &amp; totally untrue,\u201d Trump wrote Friday, adding that some were \u201ctotal bullshit &amp; only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The attacks were a dramatic departure from the upbeat public face the White House had put on it just 24 hours earlier, when Trump celebrated the report&#8217;s findings as full exoneration and his counsellor Kellyanne Conway called it \u201cthe best day\u201d for Trump&#8217;s team since his election. While the president, according to people close to him, did feel vindicated by the report, he also felt betrayed by those who had painted him in an unflattering light \u2013 even though they were speaking under oath and had been directed by the White House to co-operate fully with Mueller&#8217;s team.<\/p>\n<p>The reaction was not entirely surprising and had been something staffers feared in the days ahead of the report&#8217;s release as they wondered how Mueller might portray their testimony and whether the report might damage their relationships with Trump.<\/p>\n<p>While Mueller found no criminal evidence that Trump or his campaign aides colluded in Russian election meddling and did not recommend obstruction charges against the president, the 448-page report released Thursday nonetheless paints a damaging picture of the president, describing numerous cases where he discouraged witnesses from co-operating with prosecutors and prodded aides to mislead the public on his behalf to hamper the Russia probe he feared would cripple his presidency.<\/p>\n<p>The accounts prompted Republican Sen. Mitt Romney, who has sometimes clashed with Trump, to release a statement saying he was \u201csickened at the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection by individuals in the highest office of the land, including the President.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cReading the report is a sobering revelation of how far we have strayed from the aspirations and principles of the founders,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The report concluded that one reason Trump managed to stay out of trouble was that his \u201cefforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful &#8230; largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That didn&#8217;t spare those who defied Trump&#8217;s wishes from his wrath.<\/p>\n<p>Trump appeared to be especially angry with former White House counsel Don McGahn, who sat with Mueller for about 30 hours of interviews, and is referenced numerous times in the report.<\/p>\n<p>In one particularly vivid passage, Mueller recounts how Trump called McGahn twice at home and directed him to set in motion Mueller&#8217;s firing. McGahn recoiled, packed up his office and threatened to resign, fearing the move would trigger a potential crisis akin to the Saturday Night Massacre of firings during the Watergate era.<\/p>\n<p>In another section, Mueller details how Trump questioned McGahn&#8217;s note-taking, telling the White House counsel that, \u201cLawyers don &#8216;t take notes\u201d and that he&#8217;d \u201cnever had a lawyer who took notes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWatch out for people that take so-called \u201cnotes,\u201d when the notes never existed until needed,\u201d Trump said in one of his tweets Friday. Others whose contemporaneous notes were referenced in the report include former staff secretary Rob Porter and Reince Priebus, Trump&#8217;s first chief of staff.<\/p>\n<p>Trump ended his tweet with the word, \u201ca&#8230;\u201d suggesting more was coming. More than eight hours later, he finally completed his thought, calling the probe a \u201cbig, fat, waste of time, energy and money\u201d and threatening investigators by saying, \u201cIt is now finally time to turn the tables and bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people who have committed very serious crimes, perhaps even Spying or Treason.\u201d There is no evidence of either.<\/p>\n<p>Trump, who is in Florida for the Easter weekend, headed to his West Palm Beach golf club Friday after some early morning rain had cleared. There he played golf with conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh \u201cand a couple friends,\u201d according to the White House.<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;ll spend the rest of the weekend with family, friends and paying members of his private Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach.<\/p>\n<p>As Trump hopped off the steps from Air Force One on Thursday evening, he was greeted by a throng of supporters, who clamoured for autographs and selfies. He repeatedly told the crowd \u201cthank you everybody\u201d as they yelled encouragement.<\/p>\n<p>Ari Fleischer, who served as White House press secretary to former President George W. Bush, said in an appearance on Fox News that he didn&#8217;t understand why Trump decided to send his tweets lashing out at former aides.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it&#8217;s over,\u201d he said. \u201cIf I were the president, I would have basically declared victory with the Mueller report and everything that came out and move beyond it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still, he said he hoped the White House had learned some lessons.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe president and his entire team needs to realize how close they came to being charged with obstruction,\u201d Fleischer said. \u201cAsking your staff to lie and engaging in some of the activities that the Mueller report stated the president engaged in is too close to obstruction. And that&#8217;s a lesson I hope everybody at the White House takes with them going forward.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2013\u2013\u2013<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann in Washington and Kevin Freking in Palm Beach, Florida, contributed to this report.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2013 President Donald Trump is lashing out at current and former aides who co-operated with special counsel Robert Mueller&#8217;s &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":178806,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-jill-colvin","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210799,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210798\/revisions\/210799"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/178806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}