{"id":210722,"date":"2019-04-20T02:31:50","date_gmt":"2019-04-20T06:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=210722"},"modified":"2019-04-20T02:31:50","modified_gmt":"2019-04-20T06:31:50","slug":"democrats-subpoena-mueller-report-amid-calls-for-impeachment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/04\/20\/democrats-subpoena-mueller-report-amid-calls-for-impeachment\/","title":{"rendered":"Democrats subpoena Mueller report amid calls for impeachment"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: WASHINGTON, DC, USA – NOVEMBER 12, 1991: William Barr, nominee for U.S. Attorney General, sworn in before Senate Judiciary Committee. (Photo: Rob Crandall \/ Shutterstock.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2013 The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, has issued a subpoena for special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report as Democrats intensified their investigation of President Donald Trump, but leaders stopped short of liberal demands for impeachment proceedings.<\/p>\n

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has insisted on a methodical, step-by-step approach to the House’s oversight of the Trump administration, and she refuses to consider impeachment without public support, including from Republicans, which seems unlikely. But in light of Mueller’s findings , Democratic leaders are under mounting pressure from the party’s rising stars, deep-pocketed donors and even a presidential contender to seize the moment as a jumping-off point for trying to remove Trump from office.<\/p>\n

Speaking Friday in Belfast as Pelosi wrapped up a congressional visit to Ireland, she declined to signal action beyond Congress’ role as a check and balance for the White House.<\/p>\n

\u201cLet me assure you that whatever the issue and challenge we face, the Congress of the United States will honour its oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States to protect our democracy,\u201d she told reporters. \u201cWe believe that the first article \u2013 Article 1, the legislative branch \u2013 has the responsibility of oversight of our democracy, and we will exercise that.\u201d<\/p>\n

That approach isn’t enough for some liberals who see in Trump’s actions not just a president unfit for office but evidence of obstruction serious enough that Mueller said he could not declare Trump exonerated.<\/p>\n

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is now signed on to an impeachment resolution from fellow Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, bringing new energy to the effort. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., a presidential candidate, said Friday the House \u201cshould initiate impeachment proceedings against the president.\u201d And billionaire Tom Steyer, a leading advocate of impeachment, has grown impatient with the House’s pace of investigations and wants televised hearings to focus Americans’ attention on Trump.<\/p>\n

\u201cLet’s get the show on the road,\u201d Steyer said in an interview Friday. \u201cThe Mueller report very clearly outlined obstruction by the president and basically said, I can’t do anything about it, it’s up to Congress to hold the president accountable.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democrats, though, may see greater power in pursuing an investigative effort, leaving impeachment on the shelf as a break-glass option.<\/p>\n

The Judiciary chairman, Nadler, D-N.Y., says he expects the Justice Department to comply with the committee’s subpoena for the full report by May 1.<\/p>\n

That’s the same day Attorney General William Barr is to testify before a Senate committee and one day before Barr is to appear before Nadler’s panel. Nadler also has summoned Mueller to testify by May 23.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt now falls to Congress to determine the full scope of that alleged misconduct and to decide what steps we must take going forward,\u201d Nadler said.<\/p>\n

A Justice Department spokeswoman, Kerri Kupac, called Nadler’s move \u201cpremature and unnecessary.\u201d<\/p>\n

Barr sent Congress a redacted version of the Mueller report, blacking out several types of material, including classified information, material pertaining to ongoing investigations and grand jury evidence.<\/p>\n

Nadler said he was open to working with the department on accommodations, but he also said the committee \u201cneeds and is entitled to the full version of the report and the underlying evidence consistent with past practice.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the committee’s top Republican, Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, said the subpoena was \u201cwildly overbroad\u201d and that Trump already had declined to assert executive privilege over the Mueller report in a move of \u201cunprecedented openness.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is politically convenient,\u201d Collins said, allowing the chairman \u201cto grandstand and rail against the attorney general for not co-operating on an impossible timeline.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mueller’s report provides fresh evidence of Trump’s interference in the Russia investigation and challenges lawmakers to respond.<\/p>\n

For Congress, though, organizing an immediate response been complicated by the spring recess that left leadership in both parties away from Washington and rank-and-file lawmakers.<\/p>\n

GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy has been on a delegation trip to South America, and GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has been in Africa.<\/p>\n

One Republican, Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah was one of the few who spoke out Friday, saying he was \u201csickened\u201d by the report’s findings of dishonesty at the highest levels of the administration, \u201cincluding the president,\u201d and appalled that some Americans were working with Russians during the 2016 election.<\/p>\n

Pelosi will convene House Democrats for a conference call Monday, after the holiday weekend when many lawmakers are celebrating Easter and Passover.<\/p>\n

With Barr, Democrats expect a long battle ahead. The attorney general has come under intense scrutiny over his handling of the Mueller report and subsequent comments that have left him exposed to criticism he is acting in Trump’s interest.<\/p>\n

Late Friday Democrats rejected an offer from Barr for a limited number of congressional leaders to view some of the redacted materials in a confidential setting. They said it was inadequate.<\/p>\n

It’s unlikely that the full Mueller report or the special counsel’s public testimony will untangle the dilemma that Democrats face. Mueller laid out multiple episodes in which Trump directed others to influence or curtail the Russia investigation after the special counsel’s appointment in May 2017, and Trump made clear that he viewed the probe as a potential mortal blow \u2013 \u201cthe end of my presidency.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democratic leaders are walking a delicate line on what to do with Mueller’s findings.<\/p>\n

The No. 2 Democrat, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, drew criticism for refusing to consider impeachment, and quickly revised his comments to say \u201call options ought to remain on the table.\u201d<\/p>\n

And Pelosi, in an interview last week, before the report’s release, reiterated her \u201chigh bar\u201d for impeachment. But she also didn’t close the door on the option.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fact is the president has engaged in activities that are unethical, un-American. … In every way he is unfit to be president of the United States. Does that make it \u2013 is that an impeachable offence? Well it depends on what we see in the report.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2013\u2013\u2013<\/p>\n

Associated Press reporters Mary Clare Jalonick and Padmananda Rama in Washington, Jennifer Peltz in New York and Dylan Lovan in LaGrange, Kentucky, contributed to this report.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2013 The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, has issued a subpoena for special counsel Robert …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":208527,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-lisa-mascaro","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210722"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210722\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210723,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210722\/revisions\/210723"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/208527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}