{"id":210201,"date":"2019-04-16T01:13:51","date_gmt":"2019-04-16T05:13:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=210201"},"modified":"2019-04-16T01:13:51","modified_gmt":"2019-04-16T05:13:51","slug":"california-governor-wont-block-building-in-high-fire-areas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/04\/16\/california-governor-wont-block-building-in-high-fire-areas\/","title":{"rendered":"California governor won&#8217;t block building in high fire areas"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_210204\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210204\" style=\"width: 1080px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-210204\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1080\" height=\"607\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n.jpg 1080w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/44885391_2416810415002953_6168665373599126236_n-20x11.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1080px) 100vw, 1080px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210204\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A desire to live near nature is embedded in California&#8217;s ethos, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday as he explained why he doesn&#8217;t want to block home building near forested areas at high risk for wildfires. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/p\/BqVPdj9g_y9\/\">File Photo<\/a>: gavinnewsom<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/gavinnewsom\/\">\/Instagram<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>SACRAMENTO, Calif. \u2014 A desire to live near nature is embedded in California&#8217;s ethos, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday as he explained why he doesn&#8217;t want to block home building near forested areas at high risk for wildfires.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere&#8217;s something that is truly Californian about the wilderness and the wild and pioneering spirit,\u201d Newsom said in an interview with The Associated Press. \u201cI&#8217;m not advocating for no (building).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Newsom on Friday released a report outlining the challenges of California&#8217;s growing wildfire threat that suggested local government \u201cde-emphasize\u201d building in high-risk areas around forests. But he told the AP it was a loose suggestion aimed at starting a debate about how Californians can build smarter and closer to urban centres and economic hubs.<\/p>\n<p>More than 2.7 million Californians live in areas state fire officials say are at a very high hazard for wildfires, according to an AP analysis of census data and state fire maps. Nearly 180 cities and towns are in those very high hazard areas.<\/p>\n<p>The recently retired head of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Ken Pimlott, said last year that government should consider blocking construction in high-risk areas, given the devastating loss of property and lives.<\/p>\n<p>But Newsom said he&#8217;s never seen a realistic proposal for how to do it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI&#8217;ve never seen a deep analysis,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd I think one has to be cautious about that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A wildfire that ripped through the Northern California town of Paradise last November, destroying 19,000 buildings and killing 85 people, served as a wake-up call on the need for immediate action as the climate warms and fires worsen. The town was considered at severe risk for wildfire.<\/p>\n<p>Newsom suggested the town&#8217;s history dating to the 1800s is too deep to simply walk away.<\/p>\n<p>Instead he said Paradise should be rebuilt under more modern building codes and with a greater focus on sufficient evacuation routes and shelter-in-place plans. California has the nation&#8217;s most robust building requirement programs for new homes in fire-prone areas, and a recent analysis by McClatchy showed that a higher percentage of homes built after new building codes took effect in 2008 survived the fire than those built before.<\/p>\n<p>Newsom&#8217;s father, a former state appeals court judge, lived in Dutch Flat, a community on the edge of the Sierra Nevada range.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere&#8217;s a frontier aspect, a historic component,\u201d Newsom said, referencing the phrase \u201cGo West, young man\u201d that is often attributed to author Horace Greeley, an advocate of westward expansion.<\/p>\n<p>The concept of local control is also deeply embedded in California&#8217;s ethos and Newsom, a former mayor of San Francisco, said he doesn&#8217;t want to take away land-use planning power from local governments.<\/p>\n<p>He also suggests expanding housing in urban areas that have better access to transportation and jobs. California faces a crisis over housing affordability that has pushed more people beyond urban areas.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen I say de-emphasizing, it&#8217;s loose,\u201d he said. \u201cIt&#8217;s about considering your environment literally and not just figuratively, and beginning to be more strategic about the planning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Whether any of Newsom&#8217;s ideas, such as encouraging local planners to include fire safety concerns in their general plans, will become law remains up to the Legislature.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SACRAMENTO, Calif. \u2014 A desire to live near nature is embedded in California&#8217;s ethos, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday as &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":210204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-kathleen-ronayne","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210201"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210205,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210201\/revisions\/210205"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/210204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}