{"id":209337,"date":"2019-04-10T06:03:18","date_gmt":"2019-04-10T10:03:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=209337"},"modified":"2019-04-10T06:03:18","modified_gmt":"2019-04-10T10:03:18","slug":"chinese-vessels-have-no-business-being-near-kota-island-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/04\/10\/chinese-vessels-have-no-business-being-near-kota-island-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese vessels have \u2018no business\u2019 being near Kota Island: Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_170762\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-170762\" style=\"width: 415px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/0-02-06-c0a7588f6f69481620c989f8fe17a26d29a287b497ee5e3247c5fbb69095dd183e3a60eb.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-170762\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/0-02-06-c0a7588f6f69481620c989f8fe17a26d29a287b497ee5e3247c5fbb69095dd183e3a60eb.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"415\" height=\"260\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/0-02-06-c0a7588f6f69481620c989f8fe17a26d29a287b497ee5e3247c5fbb69095dd183e3a60eb.jpg 415w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/0-02-06-c0a7588f6f69481620c989f8fe17a26d29a287b497ee5e3247c5fbb69095dd183e3a60eb-300x188.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/0-02-06-c0a7588f6f69481620c989f8fe17a26d29a287b497ee5e3247c5fbb69095dd183e3a60eb-20x13.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 415px) 100vw, 415px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-170762\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Locsin earlier said the Philippine government has served a &#8220;salvo of diplomatic notes&#8221; to China over the presence of Chinese vessels near the Pag-asa Island in the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea). (Photo courtesy of PTV 4 via PNA)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; Malaca\u00f1ang said on Wednesday the Chinese vessels suspected to be maritime militia have \u201cno business\u201d being near the Philippine-occupied Kota Island, stressing that it will not allow China to intrude on its territorial property.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo said the government will continue to object on the presence of Chinese vessels even as it has previously filed diplomatic protests.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will object to their presence. We have already filed a diplomatic protest and that applies to everything, anything that concern Chinese vessels in our territory,\u201d Panelo said in a Palace press briefing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey should (leave), they have no business being there. They cannot be staying there forever,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo said he will leave it to Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. to decide whether there was a need to file another note verbale against China.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m sure the Secretary of Foreign Affairs will do that after validating the report,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey will know that we are against it, that we will not allow it, that we will not tolerate such presence in our territory,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo said the continuous presence of Chinese vessels could be considered as \u201cassault\u201d to the country\u2019s sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf they continue to be present in our territory then it is an assault to our sovereignty,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the decision of President Rodrigo R. Duterte to temporarily shelve an international arbitration court\u2019s verdict nullifying China\u2019s nine-dash line map to give way to friendly bilateral ties, Panelo said the Philippine government will still assert its sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile we remain friendly with respect to trade relations, we will always assert sovereignty when it is being impaired or assaulted,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>Asked if the Palace\u2019s stronger statements against China meant the President would finally assert the country\u2019s win in the sea row, Panelo replied \u201cthat\u2019s the President\u2019s call\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will have to let the President decide what action he will undertake,\u201d Panelo added.<\/p>\n<p>Duterte had previously said he would assert the arbitration ruling before he steps down in 2022.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo, meanwhile, said the government will give China \u201creasonable time\u201d to respond to their protest.<\/p>\n<p>Locsin earlier said the Philippine government has served a &#8220;salvo of diplomatic notes&#8221; to China over the presence of Chinese vessels near the Pag-asa Island in the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea).<\/p>\n<p>A report from Inquirer.net showed that apart from Pag-as Island, there have also been Chinese vessels monitored near Kota Island and Panata Island.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; Malaca\u00f1ang said on Wednesday the Chinese vessels suspected to be maritime militia have \u201cno business\u201d being near the Philippine-occupied &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":170762,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209337","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209337"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":209340,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209337\/revisions\/209340"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/170762"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}