{"id":207651,"date":"2019-03-29T23:42:49","date_gmt":"2019-03-30T03:42:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=207651"},"modified":"2019-03-29T23:42:49","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T03:42:49","slug":"trump-backtracks-on-call-to-gut-300m-great-lakes-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/03\/29\/trump-backtracks-on-call-to-gut-300m-great-lakes-program\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump backtracks on call to gut $300M Great Lakes program"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Trump’s apparent change of heart occurred the same day he reversed his budget’s call to slash $17.6 million in funding for the Special Olympics, roughly 10 per cent of the organization’s revenue, in the face of withering criticism on Capitol Hill. (File Photo<\/a>: @realdonaldtrump\/Instagram<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. \u2013 President Donald Trump tried repeatedly to gut funding for a wide-ranging Great Lakes cleanup, only to be stymied by Congress. Suddenly, he did an about-face.<\/p>\n

It happened Thursday during a campaign-style speech in the battleground state of Michigan. For years, the program the Obama administration established in 2010 enjoyed bipartisan support, and Trump \u2013 who proposed a 90 per cent cut just three weeks ago \u2013 toyed with the crowd before revealing his belated advocacy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have some breaking news,\u201d Trump told cheering supporters in Grand Rapids. \u201cYou ready? I don’t know. Can you handle it? I don’t think you can handle it.<\/p>\n

\u201cI support the Great Lakes. Always have. They are beautiful. They are big, very deep, record deepness, right? And I’m going to get, in honour of my friends, full funding of $300 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump’s apparent change of heart occurred the same day he reversed his budget’s call to slash $17.6 million in funding for the Special Olympics, roughly 10 per cent of the organization’s revenue, in the face of withering criticism on Capitol Hill.<\/p>\n

The moves illustrate that, even as his annual spending plans seek draconian reductions in many areas, Trump is uncomfortable as a budget cutter and readily backtracks when popular programs are at stake. Such concessions might annoy fiscal conservatives, but they deprive the president’s foes of ammunition as he gears up for his re-election bid.<\/p>\n

Democrats and environmentalists in the Great Lakes region, which includes fiercely contested states such as Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin that Trump carried in 2016, were skeptical that his conversion on the restoration initiative was more than a momentary gesture to draw applause at his rally.<\/p>\n

\u201cPresident Trump’s actions need to speak louder than words,\u201d said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat who co-chairs the Senate Great Lakes Task Force. \u201cI call on him to work across the aisle to restore every penny of funding he proposed to cut.\u201d<\/p>\n

The White House did not immediately respond to questions about the reasons for Trump’s new-found support of the program, which has paid for thousands of projects to clean up toxic pollution, fight invasive species, prevent harmful algae blooms and restore wetlands and other wildlife habitat.<\/p>\n

But as he prepared to announce his backing for the funds during the speech, Trump called the names of the GOP lawmakers who had lobbied for the program during a roughly 20-minute car ride with Trump from the Grand Rapids airport to the rally: Reps. Bill Huizenga, John Moolenaar and Jack Bergman of Michigan.<\/p>\n

In a phone interview Friday, Huizenga told The Associated Press the trio had pushed hard.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was a good, old-fashioned ganging up on,\u201d Huizenga said. \u201cPeople who aren’t from the Great Lakes don’t have an understanding of what the entire system is about. It can be hard to get them to wrap their heads around it. We sort of laid out the case, both the economy and the ecology of it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump asked questions about some of the projects, including a battle to prevent invasive Asian carp from reaching the lakes. Huizenga said he pitched the program as in keeping with the president’s desire to restore U.S. manufacturing and the Midwestern economy.<\/p>\n

At one point, Bergman said, \u201cMr. President, if you want to make news, this is one of the ways to make news in Michigan,\u201d according to Huizenga.<\/p>\n

He said Trump made no commitment during the ride. But the message obviously had gotten through.<\/p>\n

Does this mean the Great Lakes program is no longer in danger?<\/p>\n

\u201cI think you take it year by year,\u201d Huizenga said. \u201cBut it certainly makes it harder for them to go back and remove it out of the budget in future years.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Great Lakes initiative is the biggest of nearly a dozen regional water restorations that Trump has sought to strip of funding. Among them are programs benefiting Chesapeake Bay, the Gulf of Mexico, Puget Sound and San Francisco Bay.<\/p>\n

The president’s announcement Thursday offered them no reprieve, to the chagrin of William Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. His group supports a program that has funded research and cleanups in the nation’s biggest estuary. Trump’s budget requested $7.3 million for 2020, a 90 per cent cut from $73 million this year.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor the president to fund one national treasure’s future and not the other makes no sense to us,\u201d Baker said. \u201cWe invite the president to come see the Chesapeake Bay first-hand and hopefully make the same decision for clean water here as he did for the Great Lakes.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. \u2013 President Donald Trump tried repeatedly to gut funding for a wide-ranging Great Lakes cleanup, only to …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":200486,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-john-flesher","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207651"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":207653,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207651\/revisions\/207653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}