{"id":207639,"date":"2019-03-29T23:14:40","date_gmt":"2019-03-30T03:14:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=207639"},"modified":"2019-03-29T23:14:40","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T03:14:40","slug":"trump-issues-new-permit-for-stalled-keystone-xl-pipeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/03\/29\/trump-issues-new-permit-for-stalled-keystone-xl-pipeline\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump issues new permit for stalled Keystone XL pipeline"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Trump said the permit issued Friday replaces one granted in March 2017. The order is intended speed up development of the controversial pipeline, which would ship crude oil from tar sands in western Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast. (File Photo<\/a>: Donald J. Trump\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2013 In an apparent bid to kick-start the long-stalled Keystone XL oil pipeline, President Donald Trump on Friday issued a new presidential permit for the project \u2013 two years after he first approved it and more than a decade after it was first proposed.<\/p>\n

Trump said the permit issued Friday replaces one granted in March 2017. The order is intended speed up development of the controversial pipeline, which would ship crude oil from tar sands in western Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast.<\/p>\n

A federal judge blocked the project in November, saying the Trump administration had not fully considered potential oil spills and other impacts. U.S. District Judge Brian Morris ordered a new environmental review.<\/p>\n

A White House spokesman said the new permit issued by Trump \u201cdispels any uncertainty\u201d about the project. \u201cSpecifically, this permit reinforces, as should have been clear all along, that the presidential permit is indeed an exercise of presidential authority that is not subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act,\u201d the spokesman said.<\/p>\n

But a lawyer for environmentalists who sued to stop the project called Trump’s action illegal. The lawyer, Stephan Volker, vowed to seek a court order blocking project developer TransCanada from moving forward with construction.<\/p>\n

\u201cBy his action today in purporting to authorize construction\u201d of the pipeline despite court rulings blocking it, \u201cPresident Trump has launched a direct assault on our system of governance,\u201d Volker said Friday in an email.<\/p>\n

Trump’s attempt to \u201coverturn our system of checks and balances is nothing less than an attack on our Constitution. It must be defeated,\u201d Volker said.<\/p>\n

Calgary-based TransCanada said in a statement that Trump’s order \u201cclarifies the national importance of Keystone XL and aims to bring more than 10 years of environmental review to closure.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump \u201chas been clear that he wants to create jobs and advance U.S. energy security, and the Keystone XL pipeline does both of those things,\u201d said Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and CEO.<\/p>\n

Keystone XL will create thousands of jobs and deliver crude oil to U.S. refineries \u201cin the safest, most efficient and environmentally sound way,\u201d the company said. An appeal filed by the company is pending.<\/p>\n

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce hailed Trump’s action, saying in a statement that \u201cit shouldn’t take longer to approve a project than to build it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Keystone XL will boost U.S. economic and energy security interests, said Christopher Guith, acting president of the chamber’s Global Energy Institute. \u201cReview after review has found it can be built and operated in an environmentally responsible way. It’s time to move forward,\u201d Guith said.<\/p>\n

Anthony Swift, director of the Canada project for the Natural Resources Defence Council, an environmental group, said the pipeline \u201cwas a bad idea from Day One and it remains a terrible idea. If built, it would threaten our land, our drinking water, and our communities from Montana and Nebraska to the Gulf Coast. And it would drive dangerous climate change.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump \u201cis once again showing his disdain for the rule of law,\u201d Swift said, adding that the last time Trump \u201ctried to ram this permit through he lost in court\u201d and is likely to do so again.<\/p>\n

Keystone XL, first proposed in 2008 under President George W. Bush, would begin in Alberta and go to Nebraska, where it would join with an existing pipeline to shuttle more than 800,000 barrels a day of crude to terminals on the Gulf Coast.<\/p>\n

After years of study and delay, former President Barack Obama rejected the project in 2015. Trump reversed that decision soon after taking office in 2017, saying the $8 billion project would boost American energy and create jobs. A presidential permit is needed because the project crosses a U.S. border.<\/p>\n

After environmental groups sued, Morris said the administration had not fully considered potential oil spills and other impacts and that further reviews were needed.<\/p>\n

TransCanada disputes that, saying Keystone XL has been studied more than any other pipeline in history. \u201cThe environmental reviews are clear: the project can be built and operated in an environmentally sustainable and responsible way,\u201d Girling said.<\/p>\n

\u2013\u2013\u2013<\/p>\n

Associated Press writer Matthew Brown in Billings, Mont., contributed to this story.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2013 In an apparent bid to kick-start the long-stalled Keystone XL oil pipeline, President Donald Trump on Friday issued …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":190133,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-matthew-daly","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207639"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":207640,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207639\/revisions\/207640"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/190133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}