{"id":207617,"date":"2019-03-29T22:22:18","date_gmt":"2019-03-30T02:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=207617"},"modified":"2019-03-29T22:22:18","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T02:22:18","slug":"tories-push-for-probe-of-political-spat-with-china-following-absurd-canola-ban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/03\/29\/tories-push-for-probe-of-political-spat-with-china-following-absurd-canola-ban\/","title":{"rendered":"Tories push for probe of political spat with china following &#8216;absurd&#8221; canola ban"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_205763\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-205763\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/18010954_430521863981150_2067530962532199190_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-205763\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/18010954_430521863981150_2067530962532199190_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/18010954_430521863981150_2067530962532199190_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/18010954_430521863981150_2067530962532199190_n-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/18010954_430521863981150_2067530962532199190_n-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-205763\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">China says it has found hazardous organisms in the shipments of two major canola exporters, Richardson International Ltd. and Viterra, Inc. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RichardsonInternational\/photos\/a.235447326821939\/430521863981150\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">File Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RichardsonInternational\/\">Richardson International\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA \u2013 A Quebec Conservative MP is calling China&#8217;s decision to ban canola imports from Canada \u201cabsurd.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Tory MP Luc Berthold shot back at China during a meeting Friday of the House of Commons agriculture committee in Ottawa.<\/p>\n<p>The committee is debating a Conservative motion to compel testimony from Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland, International Trade Minister Jim Carr and Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau to address what they say is a broader political crisis with China that&#8217;s affecting the livelihoods of Canadian farmers.<\/p>\n<p>China&#8217;s decision to ban $2 billion worth of Canadian exports is widely seen as retaliation for Canada&#8217;s arrest of Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of the founder of telecom giant Huawei, at the behest of the United States.<\/p>\n<p>Saskatchewan Conservative MP Randy Hoback said the cabinet ministers need to provide \u201ccomfort\u201d to farmers that they will have a market to sell to this fall.<\/p>\n<p>China says it has found hazardous organisms in the shipments of two major canola exporters, Richardson International Ltd. and Viterra, Inc.<\/p>\n<p>China was infuriated by Meng&#8217;s Dec. 1 arrest on a U.S. extradition warrant alleging fraud.<\/p>\n<p>Nine days after Meng&#8217;s arrest, China imprisoned two Canadians &#8211; ex-diplomat Michael Kovrig and the entrepreneur Michael Spavor &#8211; and accused them of violating China&#8217;s national security.<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian Chamber of Commerce says China&#8217;s decision has no basis in scientific fact.<\/p>\n<p>Mark Agnew, senior director of international policy for the chamber, says he trusts the assessments by Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency that Canada&#8217;s crop is safe.<\/p>\n<p>Agnew, however, stopped short of linking the arrest with the canola issue.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen you look at the numbers the canola industry has put out, there&#8217;s a massive market here that looks like it&#8217;s being shut off for Canadian canola exporters,\u201d Agnew said Friday in an interview.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe trust what Health Canada and CFIA say about the safety of Canadian exports. It&#8217;s quite easy to see there&#8217;s not a science-based justification for what China is doing to Canadian canola exports.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Berthold denounced the Chinese complaints about the quality of Canadian canola.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo claim the canola sent to China didn&#8217;t meet quality standards is completely absurd,\u201d said Berthold.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe need a solution fast.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>China is the recipient of about 40 per cent of Canada&#8217;s exports of canola seed. China is the only country to raise a technical issue with the product.<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian canola industry is urging Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to press China for solutions.<\/p>\n<p>Canadian farmers say China&#8217;s ban has created uncertainty ahead of the spring planting season. Along with the Canola Council of Canada, they are calling on the government to send a delegation to China to address the issue.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, Trudeau mentioned the possibility of sending a delegation to China, as he defended the quality control of the product as \u201ctop-notch and world-class.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hoback warned that unless the government can repair the damaged relationship with China other sectors could be vulnerable to retaliation, including maple syrup or seafood.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said China&#8217;s actions on canola were \u201cscientific and reasonable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Without mentioning Huawei directly, Geng said China hopes Canada can \u201cget along with us to ensure the sound and steady development of China-Canada relations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Geng said Canada should \u201ctake practical measures to correct the mistakes it made earlier\u201d in the bilateral relationship.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; OTTAWA \u2013 A Quebec Conservative MP is calling China&#8217;s decision to ban canola imports from Canada \u201cabsurd.\u201d Tory MP &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":205763,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-mike-blanchfield","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207617"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207617\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":207618,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207617\/revisions\/207618"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/205763"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}