{"id":205221,"date":"2019-03-05T03:28:16","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:28:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=205221"},"modified":"2019-03-05T03:28:16","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:28:16","slug":"philippines-us-more-likely-to-figure-in-war-at-sea-than-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/03\/05\/philippines-us-more-likely-to-figure-in-war-at-sea-than-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Philippines: US more likely to figure in war at sea than us"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Defence Secretary Delfin Lorenzana said the treaty needed to be re-examined to clear ambiguities that could cause chaos and confusion during a crisis. He cited China’s aggressive seizure in the mid-1990s of a\u00a0Philippine-claimed reef, saying \u201cThe U.S. did not stop it.\u201d (PNA file photo by Joey O. Razon)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA,\u00a0Philippines\u00a0\u2014 The United States is more likely to be involved in a \u201cshooting war\u201d in the disputed South China Sea than the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0but the latter would be embroiled in such a conflict just the same because of its 1951 Mutual Defence Treaty with Washington, the\u00a0Philippine\u00a0defence chief said Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Defence Secretary Delfin Lorenzana said the treaty needed to be re-examined to clear ambiguities that could cause chaos and confusion during a crisis. He cited China’s aggressive seizure in the mid-1990s of a\u00a0Philippine-claimed reef, saying \u201cThe U.S. did not stop it.\u201d<\/p>\n

The\u00a0Philippine\u00a0proposal for the treaty’s review was among the key topics when U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with President Rodrigo Duterte and other officials during an overnight visit to Manila last week.<\/p>\n

The treaty behind one of the longest-standing security alliances in Asia calls on the U.S. and the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0to come to each other’s defence against an external attack. In the past, the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0has tried to clarify whether the treaty would apply if its forces come under attack in a disputed region like the South China Sea, where it has been locked in tense territorial conflicts with China and four other governments.<\/p>\n

Pompeo assured the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0during his visit that America will come to its defence if its forces, aircraft or ships come under armed attack in the South China Sea, in the first such public U.S. assurance in recent memory.<\/p>\n

The top American diplomat assured that the U.S. is committed to ensuring the South China Sea remains open to all kinds of navigation and that \u201cChina does not pose a threat\u201d of closing the disputed sea lanes.<\/p>\n

Lorenzana said U.S. forces, which have stepped up so-called freedom of navigation patrols in the strategic waterway, would more likely end up getting involved in an armed conflict than the\u00a0Philippines, which he foresees would not engage any country in a war in the contested territories.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe United States, with the increased and frequent passage of its naval vessels in the West\u00a0Philippine\u00a0Sea, is more likely to be involved in a shooting war,\u201d Lorenzana said in a statement, using the\u00a0Philippine\u00a0name for the South China Sea.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn such a case and on the basis of the Mutual Defence Treaty, the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0will be automatically involved,\u201d Lorenzana said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is not the lack of reassurance that worries me. It is being involved in a war that we do not seek and do not want,\u201d Lorenzana said.<\/p>\n

The long-seething territorial disputes are a key irritant between Washington and Beijing, which has turned several disputed barren reefs into islands with runways and other military facilities. The U.S. has declared that the peaceful resolution of the disputes and freedom of navigation and overflight in the contested areas are in the U.S. national interest.<\/p>\n

In addition to China, the\u00a0Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims in the strategic waters. U.S. Navy ships have sailed close to Chinese-occupied islands to assert freedom of navigation, provoking angry protests from China and tense moments between the rival naval forces.<\/p>\n

While Lorenzana and other\u00a0Philippine\u00a0officials wanted clarity in the treaty,\u00a0Philippine\u00a0Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. differed. \u201cIn vagueness lies the best deterrence,\u201d Locsin said in a news conference with Pompeo in Manila on Friday.<\/p>\n

Lorenzana said Tuesday that the treaty would have been reviewed as far back as 1992, when huge U.S. military bases were closed in the country and the\u00a0Philippines\u00a0lost its security umbrella.<\/p>\n

A few years after American forces left, the Chinese began their aggressive actions in Mischief Reef \u2014 \u201cnot an armed attack but it was aggression just the same. The U.S. did not stop it,\u201d Lorenzana said.<\/p>\n

Lorenzana was referring to the\u00a0Philippine-claimed reef in the South China Sea which China seized around 1995. It’s one of seven contested reefs that China has turned into islands installed with a missile defence systems in the Spratlys, the most hotly disputed region, which straddles busy sea lanes.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA,\u00a0Philippines\u00a0\u2014 The United States is more likely to be involved in a \u201cshooting war\u201d in the disputed South China Sea …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":197669,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-jim-gomez","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205221\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/197669"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}