{"id":202531,"date":"2019-02-17T01:13:26","date_gmt":"2019-02-17T06:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=202531"},"modified":"2019-02-17T01:13:26","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T06:13:26","slug":"shanahan-says-he-hasnt-determined-amount-for-border-wall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/02\/17\/shanahan-says-he-hasnt-determined-amount-for-border-wall\/","title":{"rendered":"Shanahan says he hasn’t determined amount for border wall"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Pat Shanahan, who has been leading the Pentagon since Jim Mattis stepped down Dec. 31, made the comment in an interview with reporters flying with him from Germany to Washington. (File Photo<\/a>: @DepSecDef\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 The acting secretary of defence said Saturday he has not yet determined how much money he will redirect to President Donald Trump’s border wall project.<\/p>\n

Pat Shanahan, who has been leading the Pentagon since Jim Mattis stepped down Dec. 31, made the comment in an interview with reporters flying with him from Germany to Washington.<\/p>\n

Shanahan said he has a great deal of discretion in deciding how to use the authorities granted to him by Trump’s declaration Friday of a national emergency.<\/p>\n

The former Boeing executive said he would be working out details starting Sunday, emphasizing that his mission is to support the border security needs of the Department of Homeland Security.<\/p>\n

The White House said before Trump’s announcement that the border project, which is opposed by Democrats, would receive $3.6 billion that Congress originally provided for military construction projects and $2.5 billion from the Pentagon’s 2019 drug interdiction program.<\/p>\n

Shanahan, however, indicated that he has the discretion to provide less, although he said the $3.6 billion figure is likely to prove correct. He stressed that he has not yet made any decisions.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can trust the numbers,\u201d he said, referring to the $3.6 billion and $2.5 billion, \u201cin terms of the potential.\u201d Ultimately, the amounts will be determined by linking the available funds to specific border security projects, he said, adding that those connections are not yet complete.<\/p>\n

The law allowing a repurposing of military construction funds during a national emergency says the secretary of defence is authorized \u201cto determine whether border barriers are necessary to support the use of the armed forces\u201d in an emergency.<\/p>\n

Asked whether this means he can decide whether a wall is militarily necessary, he said, \u201cFor us the determination will be made in co-ordination with the Department of Homeland Security.\u201d He said later, \u201cThere have been no determinations by me.\u201d<\/p>\n

He also said the staff that supports the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon has been working out a \u201cmission analysis\u201d of border security needs, including a recommendation on where barriers should be prioritized. This work began some time ago in anticipation of a possible Trump emergency declaration.<\/p>\n

\u201cI will go in and review that analysis now that an emergency has been declared,\u201d he said, adding later: \u201cVery deliberately, we have not made any decisions. We have identified the steps we would take to make those decisions. … We don’t want to fumble through this process\u201d or take false steps.<\/p>\n

A defence official said later that Shanahan is scheduled to be briefed in coming days by the military service secretaries and his internal staff on funding sources and likely project priorities. The official spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.<\/p>\n

Shanahan said he was aware of the political hazards of diverting military construction money from high-priority areas like military housing, suggesting he would attempt to avoid that.<\/p>\n

Rep. Mac Thornberry of Texas, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, said before Trump’s announcement that while he favours spending more on border security, he opposes diverting \u201csignificant\u201d sums from the Pentagon budget.<\/p>\n

\u201cDoing so would have detrimental consequences for our troops as military infrastructure was one of the accounts most deprived during the Obama-era defence cuts,\u201d Thornberry said on Thursday. \u201cAnd it would undercut one of the most significant accomplishments of the last two years – beginning to repair and rebuild our military. I hope that the president will pursue other options.\u201d<\/p>\n

Shanahan was returning to Washington after a week of travel in Europe and the Middle East. It was his first trip abroad as the acting secretary of defence. He visited Afghanistan and Iraq, then attended a NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels before winding up his trip by meeting Friday and Saturday with numerous officials during the annual Munich Security Conference.<\/p>\n

He said he was pleased with his reception by the NATO allies, who have been harshly criticized by Trump for not spending enough on defence.<\/p>\n

\u201cI felt very welcomed,\u201d he said, \u201cand it was a very inclusive environment. I was expecting something else.\u201d Asked what he had expected, he said, \u201cI was expecting them to be a bit more stand-offish\u201d \u2014 an apparent reference to the shock some allies felt when Mattis resigned in protest of Trump’s approach to world affairs, including his denigration of allies.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 The acting secretary of defence said Saturday he has not yet determined how much money he will redirect …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":202532,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-bob-burns","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202531\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/202532"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}