{"id":200397,"date":"2019-02-01T04:48:41","date_gmt":"2019-02-01T09:48:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=200397"},"modified":"2019-02-01T04:48:41","modified_gmt":"2019-02-01T09:48:41","slug":"climate-friendly-diets-also-healthier-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/02\/01\/climate-friendly-diets-also-healthier-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate-friendly diets also healthier: study"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_200403\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-200403\" style=\"width: 750px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/photo-1504674900247-0877df9cc836.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-200403\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/photo-1504674900247-0877df9cc836.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"750\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/photo-1504674900247-0877df9cc836.jpg 750w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/photo-1504674900247-0877df9cc836-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-200403\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The researchers ranked diets by the amount of greenhouse gas emissions per 1,000 calories consumed and divided them into five equal groups. (Unsplash Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>CHICAGO<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; After examining the carbon footprint of what more than 16,000 Americans eat in a day, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan (UM) and Tulane University shows that more climate-friendly diets are also healthier.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers ranked diets by the amount of greenhouse gas emissions per 1,000 calories consumed and divided them into five equal groups.<\/p>\n<p>Then they rated the nutritional value of foods consumed in each diet using the US Healthy Eating Index, a federal measure of diet quality, and compared the lowest- to the highest-impact groups on this and other measures.<\/p>\n<p>Americans in the lowest-carbon footprint group ate a healthier diet, as measured by this index. However, these diets also contained more of some low-emission items that are not healthy, namely added sugars and refined grains. They also had lower amounts of important nutrients, such as iron, calcium, and vitamin D.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, diets in the lowest-impact group were healthier, but not on all measures.<\/p>\n<p>Diets in the highest-impact group accounted for five times the emissions of those in the lowest-impact group. The highest-impact diets had greater quantities of meat, dairy and solid fats per 1,000 calories than the low-impact diets.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the high-impact diets were more concentrated in total proteins and animal protein foods.<\/p>\n<p>A companion study the researchers released last year found that 20 percent of Americans accounted for almost half of US diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The good news here is that there are win-win solutions with diets that are healthier for people and planet,&#8221; said study co-author Martin Heller of the UM Center for Sustainable Systems at the School for Environment and Sustainability. &#8220;Moderate shifts away from red meat and toward beans, eggs or chicken can lead to significant improvements in both health and our diet&#8217;s carbon footprint.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We hope these findings will help the public and policymakers recognize that improving diet quality can also help the environment,&#8221; Heller added.<\/p>\n<p>The study was published online Thursday in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CHICAGO\u00a0&#8212; After examining the carbon footprint of what more than 16,000 Americans eat in a day, a study conducted by &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":200403,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}