{"id":200090,"date":"2019-01-30T20:55:11","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T01:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=200090"},"modified":"2019-01-30T20:55:11","modified_gmt":"2019-01-31T01:55:11","slug":"schumer-wields-leverage-and-a-flip-phone-against-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/01\/30\/schumer-wields-leverage-and-a-flip-phone-against-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Schumer wields leverage and a flip phone against Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_200091\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-200091\" style=\"width: 384px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/384px-Chuck_Schumer_official_photo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-200091\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/384px-Chuck_Schumer_official_photo.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"384\" height=\"480\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/384px-Chuck_Schumer_official_photo.jpg 384w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/384px-Chuck_Schumer_official_photo-240x300.jpg 240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-200091\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The White House plan for peeling off Democrats to support President Donald Trump&#8217;s demands for billions in border wall money ran into a particularly stubborn obstacle: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer&#8217;s flip phone. (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=60875280\">File Photo<\/a><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=60875280\">By U.S. Senate Photographic Studio\/Jeff McEvoy\/Wikimedia <\/a>commons<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=60875280\">, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 The White House plan for peeling off Democrats to support President Donald Trump&#8217;s demands for billions in border wall money ran into a particularly stubborn obstacle: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer&#8217;s flip phone.<\/p>\n<p>Schumer had already been talking with his colleagues for months, anticipating Trump&#8217;s fight long before the shutdown battle began. Soon after the midterm elections in early November, the New Yorker started doing what he does best, talking to his senators.<\/p>\n<p>One by one, he dialed them on his vintage flip phone to gauge support for spending money on the wall with Mexico. He made a beeline for them across the Senate floor. He cornered them in the Senate gym. Most Democrats told him they were against it.<\/p>\n<p>That unity buoyed Democrats during the just-concluded shutdown saga and is now girding them for the next round, with a second federal closure threatened by the White House.<\/p>\n<p>While Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., seized the starring role against Trump&#8217;s border wall, Schumer played no small part by helping shore up his side of the Capitol and bolstering Pelosi&#8217;s position.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a strategy the Democrats will rely on as the next shutdown deadline, Feb. 15, nears, and as Senate Democrats use their minority status as leverage to align with Pelosi&#8217;s House majority on various fronts.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf anything, our unity is stronger today than it was,\u201d Schumer said Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>It was his most high-profile role since taking on the leader&#8217;s position in 2017.<\/p>\n<p>During Trump&#8217;s first two years, Senate Democrats held together to vote against the Republican tax plan, resulting in a partisan measure that has failed to gain widespread popular appeal. Democrats also denied Republicans the votes needed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, after dissent from the GOP ranks left Republicans without enough support.<\/p>\n<p>Schumer has been praised, but also criticized, for not forcing his senators to fall in line the way past leaders have done. Liberals railed against him for failing to stop Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the Supreme Court, even though only one Democrat voted for Trump&#8217;s nominee.<\/p>\n<p>Schumer is proving to be a different kind of leader, nudging his caucus to hold together on big fights, but also cutting senators loose to vote as they wish at other times.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, Schumer looked the other way as several Democrats supported a Republican banking bill that reversed some Democratic changes put in place after the Great Recession. This month, as soon as the shutdown ended, Schumer lifted the blockade on a GOP foreign policy bill supporting Israel that divided Democrats; their votes allowed it to easily advance.<\/p>\n<p>Schumer is showing the strength that Senate Democrats can assert in the chamber where 60 votes are usually needed to advance legislation to support or thwart Trump&#8217;s agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., a member of the leadership team, said Schumer has \u201can uncanny way to be able to listen\u201d to the various views and end up with a position that \u201ceventually everybody can feel OK with.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Days after the Nov. 6 election when Democrats suffered defeats in the Senate, Schumer started dialing up Democrats about the border wall. Four colleagues from states where Trump is popular lost their elections. But without much prodding, senators were lining up against giving Trump the money he wanted, according to a senior Democratic aide who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.<\/p>\n<p>Senators had approved a border security package and saw no reason to spend more. Plus, Democrats had just won the House, strengthening their hand. By the time the White House thought about flipping Democrats, it was too late.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s old the minds and hearts thing,\u201d said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. Schumer, he said, \u201cknows the minds and hearts of his colleagues.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Even in Virginia, where Sen. Tim Kaine represents thousands of federal workers who would eventually go without pay during the record 35-day shutdown, Democrats held firm.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe issue that the president chose to battle on, he just picked an issue where every Democrat is completely unified,\u201d Kaine said. \u201cOur caucus just welded together.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the end, just one Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, voted for the wall money. The White House didn&#8217;t even bother trying to call another potential Democratic vote, Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama.<\/p>\n<p>Emboldened by their newfound leverage, Democrats are now looking at areas where they can unite against some policies and perhaps win some GOP support on issues such as prescription drug prices, administration oversight or protecting special counsel Robert Mueller&#8217;s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.<\/p>\n<p>The night before a pivotal White House meeting in December, when the shutdown was a possibility but not yet reality, Schumer and Pelosi discussed strategy. They couldn&#8217;t have imagined what would come next.<\/p>\n<p>With the television cameras rolling the next day at the White House, Trump said in an exchange with Schumer that he would \u201ctake the mantle\u201d and own the shutdown. Schumer can be seen trying to hold back a smile.<\/p>\n<p>A short while later Schumer arrived back at the Capitol for a private lunch with Democratic senators. They, too, were stunned.<\/p>\n<p>The shutdown would drag for more than a month, but for Senate Democrats the new Congress was just beginning.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt reinforced a lot of our steadfastness and resolve,\u201d said Blumenthal, and \u201ctrust in our values and in the American people to see through Trump&#8217;s bullying and bluster.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 The White House plan for peeling off Democrats to support President Donald Trump&#8217;s demands for billions in border &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":200091,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-lisa-mascaro","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200090\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}