{"id":199728,"date":"2019-01-28T21:54:11","date_gmt":"2019-01-29T02:54:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=199728"},"modified":"2019-01-28T21:54:11","modified_gmt":"2019-01-29T02:54:11","slug":"uk-leader-under-new-pressure-to-secure-eu-brexit-concessions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/01\/28\/uk-leader-under-new-pressure-to-secure-eu-brexit-concessions\/","title":{"rendered":"UK leader under new pressure to secure EU Brexit concessions"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
May says she wants a deal, and insists her agreement can still win parliament’s backing, if it is tweaked to alleviate concerns about a provision for the Irish border. (File Photo<\/a>: @theresa_may\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

LONDON \u2014 Pro-Brexit British lawmakers were mounting a campaign Monday to rescue Prime Minister Theresa May’s rejected European Union divorce deal in a parliamentary showdown, as major retailers warned the U.K. could face food shortages if it leaves the bloc without an agreement.<\/p>\n

Lawmakers threw out May’s Brexit deal two weeks ago and will debate and vote Tuesday on competing plans for what to do next. Britain is scheduled to leave the EU on March 29, with or without a deal.<\/p>\n

Businesses say a no-deal Brexit would cause economic chaos by eliminating trade agreements and imposing tariffs, customs checks and other barriers between the U.K. and the EU, its biggest trading partner.<\/p>\n

Chief executives of fast-food company McDonald’s and supermarket chains Sainsbury’s and Waitrose were among signatories to a letter to lawmakers warning of \u201csignificant disruption\u201d if the U.K. leaves without a deal, given that nearly a third of Britain’s food comes from the EU.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile we have been working closely with our suppliers on contingency plans it is not possible to mitigate all the risks to our supply chains,\u201d said the retailers, who urged lawmakers to avoid a no-deal departure.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe anticipate significant risks to maintaining the choice, quality and durability of food that our customers have come to expect in our stores,\u201d they added.<\/p>\n

May says she wants a deal, and insists her agreement can still win parliament’s backing, if it is tweaked to alleviate concerns about a provision for the Irish border. The measure, known as the backstop, would keep the U.K. in a customs union with the EU in order to remove the need for checks along the frontier between the U.K.’s Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland after Britain leaves the bloc.<\/p>\n

That border is crucial to the divorce deal because it will be the only land frontier between the U.K. and the EU after Brexit. Border checkpoints have disappeared since Ireland and Britain both became members of the EU single market in the 1990s, and the 1998 Good Friday peace accord largely ended decades of violence in Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n

Opposition to the backstop by pro-Brexit lawmakers \u2014 who fear it will trap Britain in regulatory lockstep with the EU \u2014 helped sink May’s deal earlier this month. A new proposal submitted by Conservative legislator Graham Brady commits to backing May’s deal if the backstop is replaced by \u201calternative arrangements.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brady said if the motion was approved by Parliament, it would give May \u201cenormous firepower\u201d to go back to Brussels and renegotiate the Brexit divorce deal.<\/p>\n

The government hopes to bring the deal back for a new vote in Parliament in February, with enough changes to reverse its thumping defeat on Jan. 15, when lawmakers rejected it by 432 votes to 202.<\/p>\n

Some members of Parliament who voted against May’s deal the first time say they would support it if the Irish backstop was removed.<\/p>\n

Former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, a leading Brexiteer, said the prime minister was trying to secure a \u201cfreedom clause\u201d that would ensure Britain could get out of the backstop. In his weekly Daily Telegraph column, Johnson said May would have \u201cthe whole country full-throatedly behind her\u201d if she secured such a change.<\/p>\n

But EU leaders insist they will not change the legally binding Brexit withdrawal agreement.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis withdrawal agreement has been agreed with the U.K. government, it is endorsed by leaders and is not open for renegotiation,\u201d EU spokesman Margaritis Schinas said.<\/p>\n

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney said Sunday that Northern Ireland’s peace process depended on avoiding the return of a hard border.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat won’t be easy, and those who misrepresent the backstop don’t have an alternative to it,\u201d he said. \u201cThe EU has been clear that the backstop is an integral part of the withdrawal agreement.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brady’s backstop proposal is one of more than a dozen amendments proposed by U.K. lawmakers that aim to alter the course of Britain’s departure. Some others seek to rule out a no-deal Brexit so Britain can’t tumble out of the bloc on March 29 without an agreement in place to cushion the shock.<\/p>\n

Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow will announce Tuesday which amendments have been selected for debate and vote.<\/p>\n

Conservative lawmaker Nick Boles, who is backing an amendment designed to rule out a no-deal Brexit and seek a delay to Britain’s EU departure, said that Tuesday \u201cis probably the only opportunity that Parliament is going to have to intervene in this process, to take control.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we don’t seize the moment tomorrow afternoon, then we are at grave risk of just driving off the edge on March 29 without really wanting to and when there might be a compromise we could achieve, if we just had a few more months,\u201d he told the BBC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

LONDON \u2014 Pro-Brexit British lawmakers were mounting a campaign Monday to rescue Prime Minister Theresa May’s rejected European Union divorce …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":199734,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-jill-lawless-and-danica-kirka","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199728\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}