{"id":197183,"date":"2019-01-10T04:41:02","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T09:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=197183"},"modified":"2019-01-10T04:41:02","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T09:41:02","slug":"scientists-seek-ways-to-finally-take-a-real-measure-of-pain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/01\/10\/scientists-seek-ways-to-finally-take-a-real-measure-of-pain\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientists seek ways to finally take a real measure of pain"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_197184\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-197184\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/person-1052696_960_720.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-197184\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/person-1052696_960_720.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/person-1052696_960_720.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/person-1052696_960_720-300x208.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/person-1052696_960_720-768x534.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-197184\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Scientists seek ways to finally take a real measure of pain (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Is the pain stabbing or burning? On a scale from 1 to 10, is it a 6 or an 8?<\/p>\n<p>Over and over, 17-year-old Sarah Taylor struggled to make doctors understand her sometimes debilitating levels of pain, first from joint-damaging childhood arthritis and then from fibromyalgia.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s really hard when people can&#8217;t see how much pain you&#8217;re in, because they have to take your word on it and sometimes, they don&#8217;t quite believe you,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Now scientists are peeking into Sarah&#8217;s eyes to track how her pupils react when she&#8217;s hurting and when she&#8217;s not &#8212; part of a quest to develop the first objective way to measure pain.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we can&#8217;t measure pain, we can&#8217;t fix it,\u201d said Dr. Julia Finkel, a pediatric anesthesiologist at Children&#8217;s National Medical Center in Washington, who invented the experimental eye-tracking device.<\/p>\n<p>At just about every doctor&#8217;s visit you&#8217;ll get your temperature, heart rate and blood pressure measured. But there&#8217;s no stethoscope for pain. Patients must convey how bad it is using that 10-point scale or emoji-style charts that show faces turning from smiles to frowns.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s problematic for lots of reasons. Doctors and nurses have to guess at babies&#8217; pain by their cries and squirms, for example. The aching that one person rates a 7 might be a 4 to someone who&#8217;s more used to serious pain or genetically more tolerant. Patient-to-patient variability makes it hard to test if potential new painkillers really work.<\/p>\n<p>Nor do self-ratings determine what kind of pain someone has &#8212; one reason for trial-and-error treatment. Are opioids necessary? Or is the pain, like Sarah&#8217;s, better suited to nerve-targeting medicines?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s very frustrating to be in pain and you have to wait like six weeks, two months, to see if the drug&#8217;s working,\u201d said Sarah, who uses a combination of medications, acupuncture and lots of exercise to counter her pain.<\/p>\n<p>The National Institutes of Health is pushing for development of what its director, Dr. Francis Collins, has called a \u201cpain-o-meter.\u201d Spurred by the opioid crisis, the goal isn&#8217;t just to signal how much pain someone&#8217;s in. It&#8217;s also to determine what kind it is and what drug might be the most effective.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe&#8217;re not creating a lie detector for pain,\u201d stressed David Thomas of NIH&#8217;s National Institute on Drug Abuse, who oversees the research. \u201cWe do not want to lose the patient voice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Around the country, NIH-funded scientists have begun studies of brain scans, pupil reactions and other possible markers of pain in hopes of finally \u201cseeing\u201d the ouch so they can better treat it. It&#8217;s early-stage research, and it&#8217;s not clear how soon any of the attempts might pan out.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere won&#8217;t be a single signature of pain,\u201d Thomas predicted. \u201cMy vision is that someday we&#8217;ll pull these different metrics together for something of a fingerprint of pain.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>NIH estimates 25 million people in the U.S. experience daily pain. Most days Sarah Taylor is one of them. Now living in Potomac, Maryland, she was a toddler in her native Australia when the swollen, aching joints of juvenile arthritis appeared. She&#8217;s had migraines and spinal inflammation. Then two years ago, the body-wide pain of fibromyalgia struck; a flare-up last winter hospitalized her for two weeks.<\/p>\n<p>One recent morning, Sarah climbed onto an acupuncture table at Children&#8217;s National, rated that day&#8217;s pain a not-too-bad 3, and opened her eyes wide for the experimental pain test.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere&#8217;ll be a flash of light for 10 seconds. All you have to do is try not to blink,\u201d researcher Kevin Jackson told Sarah as he lined up the pupil-tracking device, mounted on a smartphone.<\/p>\n<p>The eyes offer a window to pain centres in the brain, said Finkel, who directs pain research at Children&#8217;s Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation.<\/p>\n<p>How? Some pain-sensing nerves transmit \u201couch\u201d signals to the brain along pathways that also alter muscles of the pupils as they react to different stimuli. Finkel&#8217;s device tracks pupillary reactions to light or to non-painful stimulation of certain nerve fibers, aiming to link different patterns to different intensities and types of pain.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the shooting hip and leg pain of sciatica: \u201cEveryone knows someone who&#8217;s been started on oxycodone for their sciatic nerve pain. And they&#8217;ll tell you that they feel it &#8212; it still hurts &#8212; and they just don&#8217;t care,\u201d Finkel said.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s going on? An opioid like oxycodone brings some relief by dulling the perception of pain but not its transmission &#8212; while a different kind of drug might block the pain by targeting the culprit nerve fiber, she said.<\/p>\n<p>Certain medications also can be detected by other changes in a resting pupil, she said. Last month the Food and Drug Administration announced it would help AlgometRx, a biotech company Finkel founded, speed development of the device as a rapid drug screen.<\/p>\n<p>Looking deeper than the eyes, scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital found MRI scans revealed patterns of inflammation in the brain that identified either fibromyalgia or chronic back pain.<\/p>\n<p>Other researchers have found changes in brain activity &#8212; where different areas \u201clight up\u201d on scans &#8212; that signal certain types of pain. Still others are using electrodes on the scalp to measure pain through brain waves.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, NIH wants to uncover biological markers that explain why some people recover from acute pain while others develop hard-to-treat chronic pain.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYour brain changes with pain,\u201d Thomas explained. \u201cA zero-to-10 scale or a happy-face scale doesn&#8217;t capture anywhere near the totality of the pain experience.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>The Associated Press Health &amp; Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute&#8217;s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Is the pain stabbing or burning? On a scale from 1 to 10, is it a 6 or &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":197184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-lifestyle","mauthors-lauran-neergaard","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197183\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/197184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}