{"id":196291,"date":"2019-01-04T01:32:43","date_gmt":"2019-01-04T06:32:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=196291"},"modified":"2019-01-04T01:32:43","modified_gmt":"2019-01-04T06:32:43","slug":"tech-ceos-say-liberal-innovation-agenda-does-little-to-help-firms-scale-up-poll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/01\/04\/tech-ceos-say-liberal-innovation-agenda-does-little-to-help-firms-scale-up-poll\/","title":{"rendered":"Tech CEOs say Liberal innovation agenda does little to help firms scale up: poll"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
The research is partly funded by Toronto-based tech company Delvinia. Adam Froman, the firm’s founder and CEO, said he’s made use of many different federal programs over the last 20 years — and has seen the gaps for scale-ups. (File Photo<\/a>: Delvinia\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

OTTAWA — The federal government’s big-ticket efforts to support high-growth tech firms are offering little for emerging companies that have already outgrown the fledgling start-up phase, according to a new survey of CEOs in Canada’s sector.<\/p>\n

The insights are among the early findings of a three-year research project focused on properly defining mid-sized \u201cscale-up\u201d firms, outlining what prevents them from growing into big companies in Canada and ensuring they’re central to policy discussions.<\/p>\n

\u201cScale-ups do not see their interests reflected in the federal innovation agenda,\u201d said a document summarizing the opinions of executives at 48 of these firms during interviews last summer. The research is a collaboration between industry and the University of Toronto.<\/p>\n

The research is partly funded by Toronto-based tech company Delvinia. Adam Froman, the firm’s founder and CEO, said he’s made use of many different federal programs over the last 20 years — and has seen the gaps for scale-ups.<\/p>\n

The problem, he said, is that without ongoing support, made-in-Canada firms are being purchased by foreign entities, which also gobble up valuable intellectual property Ottawa helped pay for.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re exiting too early and the government doesn’t recognize it,\u201d Froman said.<\/p>\n

Ottawa, he said, remains focused on helping firms with annual revenues under $10 million a year, when it should continue its supports for the \u201cmost-at-risk companies\u201d bringing in between $10 million and $100 million per year.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we can actually help more companies become $50-million companies, $100-million companies and stay in Canada, this will have a material impact on the future of Canada’s economic prosperity,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Froman added that scale-ups are looking for continued support beyond financial help and \u201chandouts.\u201d For instance, he said the government could do a better job promoting \u201cCanada House\u201d as a space where Canadian firms can host events in the United Kingdom and ensuring federal agencies are agile enough to provide advice and services for fast-growing companies like Delvinia.<\/p>\n

Since taking power in 2015, the federal Liberals have made big bets in hope of lifting Canada’s fast-growing sectors. Ottawa wants Canada to produce global-scale firms that will generate long-term growth and create lots of jobs.<\/p>\n

Among the measures, Ottawa has dedicated $950 million worth of public funding towards five tech \u201csuperclusters,\u201d created a $100-million program to make the federal government a bigger customer of domestic firms’ innovative products and made changes designed to entice foreign, high-level talent to move to Canada.<\/p>\n

But CEOs interviewed for the survey, taken between June and September, said despite Ottawa’s efforts federal policy has mostly focused on helping smaller, start-up firms.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think there’s a lot of frustration,\u201d said Steven Denney, the researcher at University of Toronto’s Innovation Policy Lab behind the study. \u201cI think a lot of the frustration stems from what I would say is a perceived lack of recognition.\u201d<\/p>\n

For example, the summary said CEOs wanted government to give more opportunities to domestic firms when it comes to procurement.<\/p>\n

Denney said there’s a lack of data about companies in this scale-up category, which the project is also trying to properly define as way to frame policy debate. As he zeros in on a definition, Denney said these firms should have at least $10 million in revenue and between 60 and 65 employees and be considered high-growth according to OECD standards.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we can’t define it, we can’t talk about it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

A spokeswoman for Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains said Thursday that helping businesses grow, scale up and go global is a top priority.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur government has taken concrete action to make it easier for scale-ups to access capital, access new markets, and access talent,\u201d Dani Keenan said in a statement.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will continue to work closely with business to provide the right conditions for businesses to succeed and create good jobs for Canadians.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a September report, an advisory group assembled by Bains’ department that included industry leaders said Canada has a strong entrepreneurial culture and startup capacity — but that it underperforms when it comes to scaling up companies.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe problem is that government programs tend to focus on entrepreneurs and small-and medium-sized enterprises,\u201d said the economic strategy report on digital industries. The report said the government must refocus some of its programs to help high-performing scale-ups grow into global firms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTTAWA — The federal government’s big-ticket efforts to support high-growth tech firms are offering little for emerging companies that have …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":196292,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","mauthors-andy-blatchford","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196291\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/196292"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}