{"id":193168,"date":"2018-12-08T23:20:03","date_gmt":"2018-12-09T04:20:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=193168"},"modified":"2018-12-08T23:20:03","modified_gmt":"2018-12-09T04:20:03","slug":"little-known-among-consumers-huawei-has-high-profile-in-canadian-tech-networks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/12\/08\/little-known-among-consumers-huawei-has-high-profile-in-canadian-tech-networks\/","title":{"rendered":"Little known among consumers, Huawei has high profile in Canadian tech networks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
That’s largely because Huawei is a major supplier of the equipment needed for wireless networks that could potentially be used to gather sensitive information for the Chinese government. (Huawei-Almaty)\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

TORONTO \u2014 Before the arrest of Huawei Technologies’ chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver last weekend, the Chinese company wasn’t a household name in\u00a0Canada\u00a0\u2014 certainly not in the league of an Apple, Samsung or BlackBerry.<\/p>\n

However, the Chinese tech giant considered by several of\u00a0Canada’s allies as a security threat has quietly established itself as an important provider of technology essential to\u00a0Canada’s telecom infrastructure, a situation that is not likely to change any time soon.<\/p>\n

Huawei’s share of the Canadian smartphone market has been tiny \u2014 about 3.8 per cent, according to market research from IDC\u00a0Canada\u00a0\u2014 but outside of\u00a0Canada\u00a0the company is a juggernaut, overtaking Apple earlier this year in smartphone sales and employing more than 170,000 people around the world.<\/p>\n

Founded in 1987 by a former officer of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, the company has grown at an explosive rate over the past ten years and is projected to post sales of more than US$102 billion in 2018.<\/p>\n

For\u00a0Canada’s telecom industry and the federal government in Ottawa, Huawei has long been known as an important equipment supplier \u2014 one that U.S. officials consider a significant threat to national security.<\/p>\n

That’s largely because Huawei is a major supplier of the equipment needed for wireless networks that could potentially be used to gather sensitive information for the Chinese government.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is ample evidence to suggest that no major Chinese company is independent of the Chinese government and Communist Party \u2014 and Huawei, which China’s government and military tout as a ‘national champion’ is no exception,\u201d U.S. Senators Mark Warner and Marco Rubio wrote in October in a letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.<\/p>\n

However, Canadian officials and representatives of major telecom companies have maintained that they have put safeguards in place \u2014 long ago, and before the American alarm \u2014 to ensure Huawei isn’t a security or privacy threat.<\/p>\n

Like\u00a0Canada, the United Kingdom hasn’t moved to ban Huawei from doing business with their networks \u2014 despite U.S. warnings that they may be jeopardizing the \u201cFive Eyes\u201d intelligence gathering partnership.<\/p>\n

Lawrence Surtees, vice-president for communications research at IDC\u00a0Canada, says Britain and\u00a0Canada\u00a0are the second and third most important Five Eyes partners after the United States and ahead of Australia and New Zealand.<\/p>\n

\u201cMy take is, both Ottawa and London are in a position to say … we do lots with you in the intelligence sharing and we’re not going to jeopardize our networks. We know what to do.\u201d<\/p>\n

Surtees says Huawei equipment has already been used in at least five Canadian wireless networks that use fourth-generation LTE technology, and it would be expensive to replace.<\/p>\n

Huawei is also working with Bell and Telus to develop equipment for 5G wireless networks that are expected to become increasingly vital to carriers and their customers over the next decade.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe magnitude of the contracts that Huawei has here would be a factor, with the Canadian carriers saying to Ottawa that it’s kind of too late now,\u201d Surtees says.<\/p>\n

There are very few alternative suppliers of 5G network equipment to chose from, he adds.<\/p>\n

Ericsson of Sweden, the main equipment supplier for the Rogers wireless networks, and Nokia of Finland are also global players in\u00a0Canada\u00a0but Surtees considers Huawei to be the market leader.<\/p>\n

It has been in operation in\u00a0Canada\u00a0since 2008, and currently employs about 960 people in this country \u2014 about 600 in research and development.<\/p>\n

Huawei’s Canadian head office is in the Toronto area in Markham, Ont. while its\u00a0Canada\u00a0Research Centre is based in Ottawa. The company also has research facilities in Markham, Waterloo, Ont., Montreal, Vancouver and Edmonton.<\/p>\n

Huawei also makes smartphones for current wireless networks, sold in\u00a0Canada\u00a0by Bell, Rogers, Telus, and Videotron under their main brands as well as some secondary brands such as Virgin Mobile, Fido and Koodo.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TORONTO \u2014 Before the arrest of Huawei Technologies’ chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver last weekend, the Chinese company …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":96121,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-david-paddon","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193168\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}