{"id":19162,"date":"2014-07-15T15:26:33","date_gmt":"2014-07-15T07:26:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=19162"},"modified":"2014-07-15T15:36:30","modified_gmt":"2014-07-15T07:36:30","slug":"sandiganbayan-orders-jewelry-seizure-nixes-imeldas-motion-for-reconsideration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/07\/15\/sandiganbayan-orders-jewelry-seizure-nixes-imeldas-motion-for-reconsideration\/","title":{"rendered":"Sandiganbayan orders jewelry seizure; nixes Imelda&#8217;s motion for reconsideration"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_19164\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-19164\" style=\"width: 407px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/imelda-marcos.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-19164\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/imelda-marcos.jpg\" alt=\"Imelda Marcos (Photo: http:\/\/en.wikicollecting.org)\" width=\"407\" height=\"287\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/imelda-marcos.jpg 407w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/imelda-marcos-300x211.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 407px) 100vw, 407px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-19164\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Imelda Marcos (Photo: http:\/\/en.wikicollecting.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA, Philippines &#8211; The Sandiganbayan threw out the motion for reconsideration filed by former first lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos and her daughter Irene Marcos-Araneta against the order to seize the Malaca\u00f1ang jewelry collection.<\/p>\n<p>In a decision set forth on June 11, the anti-graft court stated: \u201cA perusal of the respondents-movants\u2019 motions for reconsideration will show that the arguments set forth therein are a mere rehash or reiteration of the arguments contained in their comments and opposition to the Republic\u2019s motion for partial summary judgment, which the Court had already judiciously considered and thoroughly passed upon in the challenged partial Summary Judgment, dated Jan. 13, 2014.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The jewelry collection, estimated to be worth millions of pesos, was ordered seized by the Sandiganbayan on Jan. 13, under Civil Case No. 0141, as part of the \u201cill-gotten wealth\u201d of the Marcoses.<\/p>\n<p>In 1991, the Malaca\u00f1ang collection was appraised at between $110,055 and $153,089.\u00a0 It is the least valuable among the collections thus far seized by authorities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA, Philippines &#8211; The Sandiganbayan threw out the motion for reconsideration filed by former first lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos and her &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":19164,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,95],"tags":[6711,6710],"class_list":["post-19162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news-ph","tag-imelda-marcos","tag-marcos-jewelry","mauthors-angie-duarte","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19162\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}