{"id":190532,"date":"2018-11-21T06:30:11","date_gmt":"2018-11-21T11:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=190532"},"modified":"2018-11-21T06:30:11","modified_gmt":"2018-11-21T11:30:11","slug":"trump-defies-calls-to-punish-crown-prince-for-writers-death","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/11\/21\/trump-defies-calls-to-punish-crown-prince-for-writers-death\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump defies calls to punish crown prince for writer&#8217;s death"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_187811\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-187811\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/30010316402_963c3c955c_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-187811\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/30010316402_963c3c955c_z.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/30010316402_963c3c955c_z.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/30010316402_963c3c955c_z-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/30010316402_963c3c955c_z-20x13.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-187811\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">\u201cIt could very well be that the crown prince had knowledge of this tragic event,\u201d the president said Tuesday. \u201cMaybe he did and maybe he didn&#8217;t!\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/gageskidmore\/30010316402\/in\/photolist-MHUHwj-e41Hyp-9mEwWW-8SkPWk-NGQ37g-NwvDtJ-NDDjMS-NDDajo-LDkcRz-KPqoX2-KPcKa3-LALmqC-MHUGt7-MQVajU-MQVjMb-LWvGQ7-R5KLec-R35rzj-BGpAmd-CDViy6-NbmHqh-5KnqeT-9hKrPH-FgLUvX-F8nsPg-SfG1YG-MrVKsL-MQUZqq-C6q3L4-BGpGEq-C6qaRX-BGx2Jx-MEQYgM-MLAgQX-EjpcWv-F8nPGD-RcPB3C-SuySVF-SqT96E-23EnEpQ-24K8AxZ-SfHhhW-Rfu9yV-24K8wLF-F66vUz-2aQWumT-29tdgk5-29tdEvU-29tdAh3-29teaBE\">File Photo<\/a>:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/gageskidmore\"> Gage Skidmore\/Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump has declared he will not further punish Saudi Arabia for the killing of U.S.-based columnist Jamal Khashoggi, making clear in an exclamation-filled statement that the benefits of good relations with the kingdom outweigh the possibility its crown prince ordered the killing.<\/p>\n<p>The president condemned the brutal slaying of Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul as a \u201chorrible crime &#8230; that our country does not condone.\u201d But he rejected calls by many in Congress, including members of his own party, for a tougher response, and he dismissed reports from U.S. intelligence agencies that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman must have at least known about such an audacious and intricate plot.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt could very well be that the crown prince had knowledge of this tragic event,\u201d the president said Tuesday. \u201cMaybe he did and maybe he didn&#8217;t!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In many ways, the statement captured Trump&#8217;s view of the world and foreign policy, grounded in economic necessity. It began with the words \u201cAmerica First!\u201d followed by \u201cThe world is a very dangerous place!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It came after weeks of debate over whether the president would or should come down hard on the Saudis and the crown prince in response to the killing of the Saudi columnist for The Washington Post who had criticized the royal family.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. earlier sanctioned 17 Saudi officials suspected of being responsible for or complicit in the Oct. 2 killing, but members of Congress have called for harsher actions, including cancelling arms sales.<\/p>\n<p>Trump said \u201cfoolishly cancelling these contracts\u201d worth billions of dollars would only benefit Russia and China, which would be next in line to supply the weapons. Critics denounced Trump&#8217;s statement saying he ignored human rights and granted Saudi Arabia a pass for economic reasons.<\/p>\n<p>Asked by a reporter if he was saying that human rights are too expensive to fight for, he responded, \u201cNo, I&#8217;m not saying that at all.\u201d But then he switched the subject to the \u201cterrorist nation\u201d of Iran rather than any actions by Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. needs a \u201ccounterbalance\u201d to Iran, \u201cand Israel needs help, too,\u201d he said. \u201cIf we abandon Saudi Arabia, it would be a terrible mistake.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The mistake was Trump&#8217;s, said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, contending the administration has \u201cblinders on\u201d in comparing Iran and Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s a sign of weakness not to stand up to Saudi Arabia,\u201d Paul said in an interview. \u201cSometimes when you have two evils, maybe you don&#8217;t support either side.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Republican Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina senator who is close to Trump, also disagreed with the president&#8217;s statement, saying America must not lose its \u201cmoral voice\u201d on the\u00a0international\u00a0stage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is not in our national security interests to look the other way when it comes to the brutal murder of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi,\u201d Graham said.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, Rep. Adam Schiff, ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, said that to suggest that U.S. silence can be bought with arms sales \u201cundermines respect for the office of the presidency, the credibility of our intelligence community and America&#8217;s standing as a champion of human rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s statement, issued just before he pardoned the Thanksgiving turkey at the White House and left for the long holiday weekend in Florida, underscored his world view of putting U.S. interests \u2014 both financial and geopolitical \u2014 above all else.<\/p>\n<p>He told reporters on the South Lawn that oil prices would \u201cskyrocket\u201d if the U.S. broke with the Saudis, and he was not going to \u201cdestroy\u201d the world&#8217;s economy by being \u201cfoolish with Saudi Arabia.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Asked about any personal financial involvement, he said: \u201cSaudi Arabia has nothing to do with me. What does have to do with me is putting America first.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump said that King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed both \u201cvigorously deny\u201d any knowledge of the planning or execution of the killing. He also said the CIA has not made a conclusive determination about whether the crown prince ordered it.<\/p>\n<p>A U.S. official familiar with the case told The Associated Press last week that intelligence officials had concluded that the crown prince, the kingdom&#8217;s de facto leader, did order the killing. Others familiar with the case, however, have cautioned that while it&#8217;s likely the crown prince had a role there continue to be questions about the degree.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe may never know all of the facts surrounding the murder of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi,\u201d Trump said. \u201cIn any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. They have been a great ally in our very important fight against Iran.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Saudi prosecutors say a 15-man team sent to Istanbul exceeded its authority when the lead negotiator in the team decided to kill Khashoggi for refusing orders to return. The Saudis say the agents dismembered his body, which has not been found.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats on Capitol Hill called on the CIA and other top intelligence agencies to publicly report what it has learned about the killing.<\/p>\n<p>The CIA had no comment on the president&#8217;s statement. However, former Director John Brennan, a frequent Trump critic, tweeted: \u201cSince Mr. Trump excels in dishonesty, it is now up to members of Congress to obtain &amp; declassify the CIA findings on Jamal Khashoggi&#8217;s death. No one in Saudi Arabia \u2014 most especially the Crown Prince \u2014should escape accountability for such a heinous act.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump said he knew some members of Congress would disagree with his decision. He said he would listen to their ideas, but only if they were focused on U.S. national security.<\/p>\n<p>Late last week, a bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation that calls for suspending weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, for sanctions on people who block humanitarian access in Yemen or support the Houthi rebels, and mandatory sanctions on those responsible for Khashoggi&#8217;s death.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats harshly criticized Trump&#8217;s decision Tuesday and called on Congress to cut off arm sales to Saudi Arabia and end support for Saudi Arabia&#8217;s war against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in neighbouring Yemen, which is facing a humanitarian crisis.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cStanding with Saudi Arabia is not &#8216;America First!\u201d&#8217; said Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia where Khashoggi lived. \u201cPresident Trump has sided with a murderous regime over patriotic American intelligence officials.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California, a member of the Senate intelligence committee, said Khashoggi was killed by agents of the Saudi government in a \u201cpremeditated murder, plain and simple,\u201d and she said she would introduce legislation requiring intelligence agencies to release an unclassified public assessment.<\/p>\n<p>Secretary of State Mike Pompeo defended Trump&#8217;s decision, saying, \u201cWe are determined to ensure that we continue to make sure that we take care of the American people in all of the strategic decisions we make about with whom we work with around the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The president opened his eight-paragraph statement chastising Iran for its proxy war against Saudi Arabia in Yemen, its activities in Iraq, its backing of the Syrian government of Bashar Assad and its support of militant groups, which Riyadh has pledged billions to fight.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump has declared he will not further punish Saudi Arabia for the killing of U.S.-based columnist &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":187811,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-deb-riechmann","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190532"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190532\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/187811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}