{"id":190092,"date":"2018-11-17T18:48:16","date_gmt":"2018-11-17T23:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=190092"},"modified":"2018-11-17T18:48:16","modified_gmt":"2018-11-17T23:48:16","slug":"soul-searching-underway-as-parti-quebecois-leaders-meet-to-discuss-election-loss","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/11\/17\/soul-searching-underway-as-parti-quebecois-leaders-meet-to-discuss-election-loss\/","title":{"rendered":"Soul searching underway as Parti Quebecois leaders meet to discuss election loss"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cI think it’s too soon for those kind of ideas,\u201d Pascal Berube told reporters ahead of a gathering of riding presidents and members of the party executive at a Montreal college. (Photo<\/a>: @partiquebecois\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MONTREAL \u2014 Key members of the Parti Quebecois met on Saturday as the once-mighty sovereigntist party looks for a way forward following its crushing defeat in October’s provincial election.<\/p>\n

After a loss that saw the party’s seat count plummet from 28 to 10, some have questioned the amount of focus placed on independence, as well as then-leader Jean-Francois Lisee’s campaign decisions.<\/p>\n

One defeated ex-candidate, Jean-Martin Aussant, has suggested in an open letter to the newspaper Le Devoir that the party should essentially be disbanded and created anew.<\/p>\n

But in public, at least, the party’s interim leader seemed reluctant to endorse such drastic solutions.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it’s too soon for those kind of ideas,\u201d Pascal Berube told reporters ahead of a gathering of riding presidents and members of the party executive at a Montreal college.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat we have to do today is look at the last election: what we could do differently, and the good things as well. We have four years. We’re not going to hurry anything.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Parti Quebecois garnered only 17 per cent of the popular vote in October and lost official party status.<\/p>\n

But in Berube’s estimation, the result was more a rejection of the governing Liberals than of his own party.<\/p>\n

In their hunger for change, voters turned to Francois Legault’s Coalition Avenir Quebec, which has never before formed government.<\/p>\n

\u201cQuebecers wanted to get rid of the Liberals, and decided the (Coalition) was the best vehicle to get there,\u201d Berube said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy weren’t we that alternative, and how can we become it in the next election?\u201d<\/p>\n

Lisee, who was scheduled to give a half-hour presentation to party members at the closed-door meeting, had a similar message.<\/p>\n

\u201cHumility is also being able to say the election wasn’t about us,\u201d he told reporters. \u201cIt was about getting rid of the Liberals.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Parti Quebecois, which for 50 years has led the drive to make Quebec an independent country, has been left in disarray by the vote.<\/p>\n

Lisee’s resignation after he lost his own seat in the Montreal-area riding of Rosemont means the party will have to hold its third leadership race since 2015.<\/p>\n

The recent death of former premier Bernard Landry has highlighted the fact that the pioneering generation of Quebec sovereigntists is dwindling.<\/p>\n

And younger sovereigntists seem to be increasingly turning towards the small, left-wing party Quebec solidaire, which more than tripled its seat count in the legislature to 10 seats.<\/p>\n

Understandably, some of the post-election debate has focused on Lisee’s performance.<\/p>\n

In particular, some have questioned his decision to focus his attacks in the waning days of the campaign on Quebec solidaire’s popular co-spokesperson and to question the party’s structure, which includes two spokespersons but no leader.<\/p>\n

Others have wondered whether Lisee’s promise not to hold a referendum until at least 2022 left the party without it’s raison d’etre.<\/p>\n

Berube declined to comment on whether the referendum position had been a mistake, saying only that the party would review its strategy in the future.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are sovereigntists, but for the rest we’re open,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Lisee, for his part, denied having made any major errors in the campaign.<\/p>\n

He maintained that his decision in the third leaders’ debate to question Quebec solidaire’s Manon Masse on who really \u201cpulls the strings\u201d in her party saved the PQ from slipping from third to fourth.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf nothing had been done, it would have been worse,\u201d he said, while acknowledging his opinion was not universally shared.<\/p>\n

Despite losing the election, Lisee said he believed the Parti Quebecois had run the best campaign \u2014 an assertion Berube flatly rejected.<\/p>\n

\u201cObviously not,\u201d he said when asked if the Parti Quebecois had run a good campaign. \u201cWe lost.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MONTREAL \u2014 Key members of the Parti Quebecois met on Saturday as the once-mighty sovereigntist party looks for a way …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":190093,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-morgan-lowrie","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190092\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/190093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}