{"id":188090,"date":"2018-11-03T03:19:51","date_gmt":"2018-11-03T07:19:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=188090"},"modified":"2018-11-03T03:19:51","modified_gmt":"2018-11-03T07:19:51","slug":"new-defence-infowars-copyright-case-pepe-toad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/11\/03\/new-defence-infowars-copyright-case-pepe-toad\/","title":{"rendered":"New defence for Infowars in copyright case? “Pepe the Toad”"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cSo, it definitely did not inspire his creation of Pepe,’ Tompros wrote in an email Friday. (File Photo By Michael Zimmermann\/Wikimedia <\/a>commons, CC BY- SA 4.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The internet trolls who turned Pepe the Frog into a hate symbol may be disappointed to hear a new claim about the cartoon character’s origins, courtesy of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars website.<\/p>\n

Infowars’ attorneys claim in a court filing Thursday that Pepe the Frog creator Matt Furie based his character on a \u201cpre-existing, strikingly similar\u201d Argentine cartoon character named \u201cEl Sapo Pepe,\u201d or \u201cPepe the Toad.\u201d<\/p>\n

That’s a new defence for Infowars against a copyright infringement lawsuit that Furie filed in March over the site’s sales of a poster copying the character.<\/p>\n

Infowars’ attorneys argue Furie could be precluded from asserting any copyright interest in his creation if Pepe the Frog is an \u201cunauthorized derivative work\u201d based on Pepe the Toad. Or it could \u201cat least severely the scope of copyright protection in the character,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou’ve got to ask yourself if Mr. Furie’s work is truly original,\u201d Infowars attorney Marc Randazza said during a telephone interview Friday. \u201cI think it’s at least worth taking a closer look.\u201d<\/p>\n

Louis Tompros, one of Furie’s attorneys, said the California-based cartoonist had never heard of \u201cEl Sapo Pepe\u201d before receiving a letter from Infowars’s attorneys about it.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo, it definitely did not inspire his creation of Pepe,’ Tompros wrote in an email Friday.<\/p>\n

A federal judge set a July 2019 trial date for the lawsuit Furie filed against Infowars in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n

It was the second such case that Furie has brought as part of a legal campaign to reclaim his creation.<\/p>\n

Infowars’ website is the online platform for right-wing radio host Jones. Furie’s lawsuit says he didn’t authorize the site to sell a poster that depicts the anthropomorphic frog alongside images of Jones, President Donald Trump, far-right agitator Milo Yiannopoulos and other right-wing figures.<\/p>\n

Jones has described the lawsuit as a \u201cpublicity stunt\u201d and said he views it as an expression of political speech protected by the First Amendment.<\/p>\n

\u201cMy listeners understand this is all frivolous,\u201d Jones told The Associated Press in March.<\/p>\n

Infowars was selling the Pepe-adorned \u201cMAGA\u201d poster for $29.95 and says it was created by \u201crenowned artist and patriot\u201d Jon Allen. Jones said Infowars has sold about 1,000 of the posters but added that it’s hardly one of the site’s most popular items.<\/p>\n

Furie’s \u201cchill frog-dude\u201d debuted in a 2006 comic book called \u201cBoy’s Club\u201d and became a popular canvas for benevolent internet memes. But the user-generated mutations grew increasingly hateful and ubiquitous more than a year before the 2016 presidential election, when Furie’s creation become an online mascot for white nationalists, neo-Nazis and other right-wing extremists.<\/p>\n

The Anti-Defamation League branded Pepe as a hate symbol in September 2016 and promoted Furie’s efforts to reclaim the character.<\/p>\n

Twitter banned Jones and Infowars from the social media platform earlier this year for abusive behaviour. Jones has been sued by targets of his conspiracy theories, including parents of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012. Jones questioned whether the shooting rampage was a hoax.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The internet trolls who turned Pepe the Frog into a hate symbol may be disappointed to hear a new claim …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":188091,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","mauthors-michael-kunzelman","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188090\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/188091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}