{"id":187989,"date":"2018-11-02T21:22:49","date_gmt":"2018-11-03T01:22:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=187989"},"modified":"2018-11-02T21:22:49","modified_gmt":"2018-11-03T01:22:49","slug":"us-judge-strikes-california-land-law-suit-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/11\/02\/us-judge-strikes-california-land-law-suit-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"US judge strikes down California land law in suit by Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cThis was a stunning assertion of constitutional power by California, and it was properly and promptly dismissed by the district judge.\u201d (File Photo: By United States Government\/Wikimedia <\/a>commons, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

SAN FRANCISCO \u2014 A U.S. judge struck down a California law challenged by the Trump administration that aimed to give the state power to override the sale of federal lands.<\/p>\n

The law unconstitutionally regulates the U.S. government and discriminates against people seeking to buy federal public land, Judge William Shubb in Sacramento ruled Thursday.<\/p>\n

State lawmakers who passed the law \u2014 SB50 \u2014 last year cited concerns that the Trump administration would allow more logging, oil drilling or development on some of the 46 million acres owned by the federal government in California.<\/p>\n

Gov. Jerry Brown signed the law a year ago, and it went into effect in January. The U.S. Department of Justice filed its lawsuit in April \u2014 one of several the administration has filed against California as the state seeks to thwart President Donald Trump’s policies.<\/p>\n

California has sued the administration nearly four dozen times, mostly over immigration, the environment and health care.<\/p>\n

The California attorney general’s office referred comment on Shubb’s ruling to the State Lands Commission. Sheri Pemberton, a spokeswoman for the commission, said the commission was analyzing the decision and would make a decision about a possible appeal before the end of the year.<\/p>\n

The law sought to give the commission the first right to purchase federal lands or to arrange for a specific buyer and included fines for failing to do so.<\/p>\n

The DOJ argued in its lawsuit that California had no power to interfere with federal land sales, citing the Constitution and the 1850 act of Congress that admitted California to the union.<\/p>\n

It said the state law was delaying land sales \u2014 even for projects that had been in the works for years \u2014 and was depressing their value.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe court’s ruling is a firm rejection of California’s assertion that, by legislation, it could dictate how and when the federal government sells federal land,\u201d Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. \u201cThis was a stunning assertion of constitutional power by California, and it was properly and promptly dismissed by the district judge.\u201d<\/p>\n

Shubb, who was nominated to the bench by Republican President George H.W. Bush, rejected the state’s argument that the law regulated land buyers, not the federal government.<\/p>\n

The law \u201ctrespasses on the federal government’s ability to convey land to whomever it wants,\u201d the judge said.<\/p>\n

It also singles out people who do business with the federal government, Shubb said, subjecting them to a \u201clevel of uncertainty and potential delay that all others are spared from.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Trump administration has also sued California over state laws that protect immigrants in the country illegally and a net neutrality bill requiring internet providers to maintain a level playing field online.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SAN FRANCISCO \u2014 A U.S. judge struck down a California law challenged by the Trump administration that aimed to give …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":187992,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-sudhin-thanawala","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187989\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/187992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}