{"id":183381,"date":"2018-09-28T02:28:52","date_gmt":"2018-09-28T06:28:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=183381"},"modified":"2018-09-28T02:28:52","modified_gmt":"2018-09-28T06:28:52","slug":"new-orleans-gallery-acquires-lincoln-opera-glasses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/09\/28\/new-orleans-gallery-acquires-lincoln-opera-glasses\/","title":{"rendered":"New Orleans gallery acquires Lincoln opera glasses"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_183382\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-183382\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/DjsFMD2XsAcIJiQ.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-183382\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/DjsFMD2XsAcIJiQ.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/DjsFMD2XsAcIJiQ.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/DjsFMD2XsAcIJiQ-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/DjsFMD2XsAcIJiQ-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-183382\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: M.S. Rau Antiques in New Orleans (<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RauAntiques\/status\/1025419047448571904\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RauAntiques\">@RauAntiques\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"p1\">NEW ORLEANS \u2014 It&#8217;s not the gilt-detailed craftsmanship or the age of the small, brass, black-enameled binoculars that might fetch a French Quarter antique gallery&#8217;s asking price of $795,000. It&#8217;s their history: Abraham Lincoln is believed to have used them to get a better view of the stage at Ford&#8217;s Theatre on the night he was assassinated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">M.S. Rau Antiques recently acquired the binoculars, known as opera glasses, from a seller who has remained anonymous. Previous owners have included the Forbes family of publishing fame \u2014 the magazine reportedly paid $24,000 for them in 1979. Others include generations of descendants of Capt. James McCamly, a military officer believed to have picked the opera glasses up from the street after they fell from Lincoln&#8217;s near-lifeless body (it&#8217;s unclear if they were in the president&#8217;s hands or entangled in his clothing) as he was carried out of the theatre on the night of April 14, 1865.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">&#8220;We deal in history and we deal in great pieces and this is one of the most exciting pieces we&#8217;ve ever owned,&#8221; Bill Rau, the third-generation owner of the century-old family business on Royal Street, said Thursday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Rau said he had been contacted roughly two weeks earlier by the previous owner, who said he had paid $424,000 for the opera glasses at Christies&#8217; auction house in 2002. He was interested in selling. &#8220;He&#8217;s now in his 80s and he&#8217;s suffered some health issues and that&#8217;s why he called us,&#8221; Rau said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">The story behind the artifact: After Lincoln was shot, McCamly was among those helping move the mortally wounded president from the theatre to a building across the street. Something fell from Lincoln&#8217;s body and McCamly picked it up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">He found the binoculars in his pocket the next day. It&#8217;s unclear whether he tried to return them amid the turmoil following the president&#8217;s death. They were handed down within the family from generation to generation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Documents attesting to their authenticity include a 1968 letter from a National Park Service chief curator to McCamly&#8217;s great-great-grandson, who was seeking to verify family lore. It said the opera glasses &#8220;precisely fit&#8221; a case picked up in Lincoln&#8217;s box the night he was shot.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">There have been skeptics. Another park service curator told The Washington Post in 2011 that she doubted the opera glasses would still have been on Lincoln&#8217;s person as he was carried across the street and that the case in which they fit may have been Mary Todd Lincoln&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">But past buyers have been convinced of the artifact&#8217;s authenticity, as is Rau, who pointed to a tiny dent in one eyepiece as evidence lending credibility to the McCamly family story. (The Christie&#8217;s website description of the glasses notes a small crack in one lens &#8220;as if dropped.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">&#8220;Certainly, our belief, and the market&#8217;s belief, from what they&#8217;ve sold for in the past, is that they are the real thing,&#8221; Rau said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Stored under a glass display dome, the binoculars are currently on the second floor of the Rau gallery near a Lincoln portrait. Rau says they will be sold to whoever comes up with the sale price, but he adds that his hope is that they go to a collector or museum who will put them on public view. &#8220;They are,&#8221; he says, &#8220;a pivotal piece of American history.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW ORLEANS \u2014 It&#8217;s not the gilt-detailed craftsmanship or the age of the small, brass, black-enameled binoculars that might fetch &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":183382,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-art-and-culture","mauthors-kevin-mcgill","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183381\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/183382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}