{"id":182153,"date":"2018-09-19T03:53:23","date_gmt":"2018-09-19T07:53:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=182153"},"modified":"2018-09-19T03:53:23","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T07:53:23","slug":"trillanes-paranoia-casing-claim-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/09\/19\/trillanes-paranoia-casing-claim-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"Trillanes \u2018in paranoia\u2019 over casing claim: Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cFirst, it\u2019s drama; now it appears to be paranoia.” (File Photo<\/a>:
Antonio “Sonny” Trillanes IV\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Senator Antonio Trillanes IV could be in a state of paranoia for claiming suspicious-looking men have been casing his house while he remains holed up in the Senate, Malaca\u00f1ang said Tuesday.<\/p>\n

\u201cFirst, it\u2019s drama; now it appears to be paranoia,\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said when asked in a Palace press briefing about the opposition senator\u2019s claim.<\/p>\n

Trillanes has also reportedly said the suspicious-looking men on board \u201cunregistered\u201d vehicles could be from the government intelligence units.<\/p>\n

Roque refuted Trillanes\u2019 suspicion, saying President Rodrigo Duterte has left Trillanes\u2019 voided amnesty to the Makati Regional Trial Court (RTC).<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it\u2019s very clear, the President has left the matter to the RTC of Makati; and so as the Supreme Court,\u201d Roque said.<\/p>\n

On August 31, Duterte issued Proclamation 572 declaring void ab initio (from the beginning) the amnesty granted by the previous administration to Trillanes.<\/p>\n

Duterte cited Trillanes\u2019 failure to comply with mandatory requirements such as amnesty application form and admission of guilt to the crimes of rebellion he committed against former President and now House Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.<\/p>\n

In his proclamation, Duterte ordered the military and police \u201cto employ all lawful means\u201d to arrest Trillanes, prompting the former Navy officer to seek refuge in the Senate.<\/p>\n

Trillanes requested for temporary restraining order against Proclamation 572 but the Supreme Court (SC) turned it down.<\/p>\n

Despite the SC\u2019s verdict, Duterte still opted to wait for Makati RTC\u2019s decision on the Department of Justice\u2019s request to issue an alias warrant of arrest and a hold departure order against Trillanes.<\/p>\n

Roque had earlier said Trillanes is just trying to make drama to gain political mileage for staying in the Senate since September 3, despite assurances from the government that he will not be arrested without a court order.<\/p>\n

He said the SC ruling has actually removed legal impediment to arrest Trillanes, but Duterte decided to wait for the lower court\u2019s decision out of respect.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no legal impediment but there is such a thing as respect for the courts,\u201d Roque said in a previous press briefing.<\/p>\n

Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo said Trillanes\u2019 amnesty was also null and void from the very beginning since it was former Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and not former President Benigno Aquino III who approved his amnesty.<\/p>\n

Duterte, a former fiscal, has also agreed that only the President has the power to grant amnesty and pardon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0\u2013 Senator Antonio Trillanes IV could be in a state of paranoia for claiming suspicious-looking men have been casing his …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":182155,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182153\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/182155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}