{"id":1813,"date":"2013-10-08T08:01:34","date_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:01:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/?p=1813"},"modified":"2014-02-08T08:03:48","modified_gmt":"2014-02-08T16:03:48","slug":"claudine-raymart-court-battle-heats-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2013\/10\/08\/claudine-raymart-court-battle-heats-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Claudine-Raymart court battle heats up"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_1814\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1814\" style=\"width: 500px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/claudine.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1814\" alt=\"Claudine with some of her friends. The photo caption reads: &quot;Enjoying life.&quot; Photo from the Facebook Page of Claudine Barretto\" src=\"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/claudine.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/claudine.jpg 500w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/claudine-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/claudine-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1814\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Claudine with some of her friends. The photo caption reads: &#8220;Enjoying life.&#8221; Photo from the Facebook Page of Claudine Barretto<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The court battle between estranged spouses Claudine Barretto\u00a0and Raymart Santiago continues.<\/p>\n<p>It will be recalled that Santiago filed a counter-affidavit, stating that Claudine is a drug addict, but Barretto, through her lawyer Ferdinand Topacio, strongly denied Santiago\u2019s accusations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>It was very clear that nilabas nila yung video para pahiyain yung kliyente ko<\/em> (they presented the video to humiliate my client) but there\u2019s no truth to the rumors <em>na pinopropogate nila na<\/em> (that they\u2019re propagating that) my client is a drug addict,\u201d Atty. Ferdinand Topacio said.<\/p>\n<p>Topacio explained that the youngest among the Barretto siblings is taking injections to fight allergy and to combat aging.<\/p>\n<p>He elaborated that what was seen on the video that was circulating was Claudine, taking the Gerovital H3, which she used to maintain her beauty and good health.<\/p>\n<p>In a separate interview, the versatile Kapamilya actress answered Santiago\u2019s accusations against her. \u201c<em>Kung totoong mentally ill ako or drug addict ako, bakit mo pababayaan sa akin ang mga bata ng ilang buwan? Hindi ba dapat iyon ang unang binitbit mo, hindi &#8216;yung mga Louis Vuitton luggage, hindi relo at hindi pera. Kung hindi pa siya na-TPO (temporary protection order), wala siyang pakialam sa mga anak niya<\/em>\u00a0(If it is true that I am mentally ill or I am a drug addict, why are you allowing my children to stay with me for a few months? Isn\u2019t it that you should have brought them first with you, instead of bringing the Louis Vuitton luggages, the watch and the money? If he was not given a TPO (temporary protection order), he will not even care about his children).\u201d<\/p>\n<h6>Negative results for Claudine<\/h6>\n<p>Meanwhile, Miguel Barretto, the Barretto patriarch, came to Claudine\u2019s defense by showing a copy of the negative result of his daughter\u2019s drug test.<\/p>\n<p>Claudine passed drug tests for Phencyclidine, Barbiturates, Benzodiazepines, Cocaine, Ecstacy, Methadone, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Opium and Thetrahydrocannabinol.<\/p>\n<p>Miguel then challenged Raymart to undergo a drug test also, adding that he will be the one to pay for it.<\/p>\n<p>Claudine has also filed a criminal case against her estranged husband \u00a0for violation of RA 4200, also known as the \u00a0Anti Wire-Tapping Law, against Raymart.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInside my own house, without my knowledge, <em>kahit sa loob ng banyo namin merong mga video cameras\u00a0<\/em>(even inside our comfort room, there are video cameras),\u201d Claudine said.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, Raymart\u2019s lawyer Ruth Castelo said that they will just leave it to the court to decide as they\u2019ve already submitted their evidence.<\/p>\n<p>In a separate interview, Gretchen Barretto, revealed that her youngest sister is really a drug addict and has a mental condition. She further said that their father is also aware of this.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Raymart Santiago appealed to the parents of Claudine to expose the truth about their daughter.<\/p>\n<p>He said: \u201c<em>Mommy, Daddy, alam n\u2019yo kung ano ang totoo. Alam n\u2019yo kung anong pinag-usapan natin noon at sana panindigan n\u2019yo yun.<\/em>\u201d (Mommy, Daddy, you know what\u2019s the truth. You know what we\u2019re talking about then and I hope you stand by it).<\/p>\n<p>On behalf of Santiago, Atty. Castelo wrote: \u201c\u2026instead of denying Claudine\u2019s drug abuse and closing their eyes to the problem, they should put their foot down as parents and compel Claudine to submit herself to rehabilitation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Raymart pleads: \u201c<em>Huwag na nilang kunsintihin. Ipagamot na nila agad dahil kailangan na kailangan na.<\/em>\u201d \u00a0(They should not tolerate her. They should have her checked immediately because it is extremely necessary).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The court battle between estranged spouses Claudine Barretto\u00a0and Raymart Santiago continues. It will be recalled that Santiago filed a counter-affidavit, &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-entertainment-ph","mauthors-katherine-marfal-teves","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1813\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}