{"id":180640,"date":"2018-09-09T03:54:07","date_gmt":"2018-09-09T07:54:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=180640"},"modified":"2018-09-09T03:54:07","modified_gmt":"2018-09-09T07:54:07","slug":"amnesty-invalidation-libel-raps-vs-trillanes-purely-coincidental","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/09\/09\/amnesty-invalidation-libel-raps-vs-trillanes-purely-coincidental\/","title":{"rendered":"Amnesty invalidation, libel raps vs. Trillanes &#8216;purely coincidental&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_115779\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-115779\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Senator-Antonio-Trillanes-IV.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-115779\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Senator-Antonio-Trillanes-IV.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"722\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Senator-Antonio-Trillanes-IV.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Senator-Antonio-Trillanes-IV-300x226.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Senator-Antonio-Trillanes-IV-768x578.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-115779\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Trillanes said in a statement that the president should address the allegations \u201csquarely and to stop \u201cfooling\u201d the Filipinos. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/senateph\/photos\/pcb.1615181231839485\/1615180701839538\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/senateph\">Senate of the Philippines\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra on Sunday said the declaration of the amnesty granted to Senator Antonio Trillanes IV as void ab initio and the filing of libel cases against him were \u201cpurely coincidental\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe timing of the filing of the libel complaints vs. Senator Trillanes, according to the complainants, had nothing to do with the nullification of the Senator\u2019s amnesty. The libel complaints were filed on the anniversary date of the utterance of the allegedly defamatory statements,\u201d Guevarra told reporters in a text message.<\/p>\n<p>The justice chief was reacting to allegations that the two events were an orchestrated plan to bring down the opposition senator.<\/p>\n<p>President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s Proclamation No. 572 was signed last Aug. 31 and was disclosed to the public only last Sept. 2 while the filing of the two libel cases by presidential son and former Davao City vice mayor Paolo Duterte and presidential son-in-law Manases Carpio against Trillanes, were on Sept. 6 but reported on September 7.<\/p>\n<p>Carpio is the husband of presidential daughter and Davao City Mayor Inday Sara Z. Duterte.<\/p>\n<p>Paolo Duterte\u2019s complaint was received by Davao City Office of the Special Prosecutor-Assistant Regional Prosecutor Karl Andre Salcedo.<\/p>\n<p>Guevarra, meanwhile, noted that the DOJ will not intervene in the libel case against the senator.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo, I will not interfere in the conduct of the preliminary investigation. It is not proper,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The justice chief added that the Makati City Regional Trial Court (RTC) does not have to wait for the Supreme Court to act on the petition filed by Trillanes.<\/p>\n<p>He said the Makati RTC can proceed with acting on the criminal cases against the beleaguered senator over his involvement in the 2003 Oakwood mutiny and the 2007 Manila Peninsula siege.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnless restrained by the SC, the trial courts may proceed,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The Department of Justice (DOJ) has already filed separate motions before Makati RTC Branches 148 and 150 asking that arrest warrants and hold departure orders (HDO) be issued against Trillanes.<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ filed the motion before Branch 148 on Tuesday, while the motion before Branch 150 was filed on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>Branch 148 is handling the coup d\u2019etat case against Trillanes concerning the Oakwood mutiny while Branch 150 is handling the rebellion case against the senator over the Manila Peninsula siege.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Andres Soriano of Branch 148 has already ordered a hearing on Sept. 13 over the DOJ\u2019s motion.<\/p>\n<p>Soriano has also directed Trillanes to file a comment regarding the DOJ\u2019s motion.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, Makati RTC Branch 150 Judge Elmo Alameda is expected to issue an order regarding the DOJ\u2019s motion this coming week.<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ filed the motions after Duterte issued Proclamation 572, which declared as \u201cvoid ab initio\u201d or void from the start, the amnesty granted to Trillanes for failing to comply with the requirements.<\/p>\n<p>The amnesty was granted in 2010 under Proclamation No. 75 of then president Benigno \u201cNoynoy\u201d Aquino III regarding the involvement of Trillanes and a number of others in the Oakwood mutiny and Manila Peninsula siege.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday, the camp of Trillanes, led by his lawyer Reynaldo Robles, filed a petition before the Supreme Court seeking the issuance of a temporary restraining order against Duterte&#8217;s proclamation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra on Sunday said the declaration of the amnesty granted to Senator Antonio Trillanes IV as &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":115779,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-christopher-lloyd-caliwan","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180640\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/115779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}