{"id":1761,"date":"2013-11-12T07:27:22","date_gmt":"2013-11-12T15:27:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/?p=1761"},"modified":"2014-02-08T07:28:28","modified_gmt":"2014-02-08T15:28:28","slug":"mtrcb-calls-representatives-of-unang-hirit-to-attend-a-conference-pertaining-to-arnold-clavios-controversial-remarks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2013\/11\/12\/mtrcb-calls-representatives-of-unang-hirit-to-attend-a-conference-pertaining-to-arnold-clavios-controversial-remarks\/","title":{"rendered":"MTRCB calls representatives of \u201cUnang Hirit\u201d to attend a conference pertaining to Arnold Clavio\u2019s controversial remarks"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_1762\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1762\" style=\"width: 480px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/arnold.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1762\" alt=\"Photo: Facebook Page of Arnold Clavio\" src=\"http:\/\/66.147.244.209\/~canadiu3\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/arnold.jpg\" width=\"480\" height=\"548\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/arnold.jpg 480w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/arnold-262x300.jpg 262w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1762\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Facebook Page of Arnold Clavio<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>After Arnold Clavio drew flak from netizens who had watched his phone patch interview with Atty. Alfredo Villamor, alleged pork barrel queen Janet Napoles\u2019 new lawyer, the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) has called on the representatives of the GMA 7 morning show \u201cUnang Hirit\u201d to attend a \u00a0conference on Monday, November 11.<\/p>\n<p>The controversial interview happened on Tuesday, November 5. The veteran anchor\u2019s irritation began when Villamor said that he\u2019s not sure if Napoles will attend the Senate hearings on the PDAF (Priority Development Assistance Fund), saying that he was hired for Napoles\u2019 illegal detention case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Eh sino po ba ang dapat naming kausapin dito<\/em>?\u201d (Then, who must we interview for this matter?) Clavio asked.<\/p>\n<p>But his\u00a0 next statements were just as widely- criticized.<\/p>\n<p>He said irately, \u201c<em>Pasira ka ng araw eh. Tatawa-tawa ka pa!<\/em>\u201d and \u201c<em>Wala po akong nakuha sa inyo.<\/em>\u201d (You ruined our day. You are even laughing! I really didn\u2019t get anything from you).<\/p>\n<p>As of posting time, the video of the interview has 14,274 hits.<\/p>\n<p>In a text message to Yahoo Philippines OMG!, MTRCB chair Atty. Toto Villareal said,\u00a0 \u201cWe also want to hear the program\u2019s side and how they can self-regulate vs any incident similar to the alleged one.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, on Thursday, November 7 via \u201cUnang Hirit,\u201d Clavio said he just wanted to shed some light on the issue, but he also expressed his apologies to those who were offended by his remarks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After Arnold Clavio drew flak from netizens who had watched his phone patch interview with Atty. Alfredo Villamor, alleged pork &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-entertainment-ph","mauthors-katherine-marfal-teves","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1761\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}