{"id":175776,"date":"2018-08-08T22:34:10","date_gmt":"2018-08-09T02:34:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=175776"},"modified":"2018-08-08T22:34:10","modified_gmt":"2018-08-09T02:34:10","slug":"no-pork-barrel-2019-budget-solons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/08\/08\/no-pork-barrel-2019-budget-solons\/","title":{"rendered":"No pork barrel in 2019 budget: solons"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_174037\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-174037\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Rolando-Andaya.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-174037\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Rolando-Andaya.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"636\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Rolando-Andaya.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Rolando-Andaya-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Rolando-Andaya-768x509.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-174037\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Andaya said the lower chamber would be &#8220;observant&#8221; of the Supreme Court (SC) ruling, which declared as unconstitutional the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or \u201cpork barrel.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RolandoNonoyAndayaJr\/photos\/a.485905391824083.1073741829.485276371886985\/537637673317521\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\"> (File photo: Rolando &#8220;Nonoy&#8221; Andaya Jr\/Facebook)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8211;The leadership of the House of Representatives on Wednesday assured the public that there is no pork barrel or lump sum funds in the 2019 national budget.<\/p>\n<p>House Majority Leader Rolando Andaya Jr. made the statement in response to Senator Panfilo Lacson&#8217;s claim of the possible return of the &#8220;happy pork barrel days&#8221; under the leadership of Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.<\/p>\n<p>Andaya said the lower chamber would be &#8220;observant&#8221; of the Supreme Court (SC) ruling, which declared as unconstitutional the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or \u201cpork barrel.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The leadership of the House will be observant of the SC ruling. Most especially regarding lump sum funds and the role of legislators in budgetary authorization,&#8221; Andaya said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The process we will observe will be no different from the process adopted by the Senate,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Deputy Speaker Fredenil Castro described Lacson&#8217;s statement about the return of pork barrel as &#8220;speculative and a convenient guess work&#8221;, noting that it is &#8220;bereft of any legal and factual bases.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The good senator himself said that there is a Supreme Court decision on the matter henceforth, regardless of who is the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court decision will always be observed,&#8221; Castro said.<\/p>\n<p>Lacson also sounded the alarm against the &#8220;massive mangling&#8221; of the National Expenditure Program following Arroyo&#8217;s pronouncement that all congressmen will receive allocations for their respective districts.<\/p>\n<p>Arroyo said she will not give zero-budget to lawmakers who are critical of the administration.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Bibigyan lahat ng<\/em>\u00a0(All congressmen will be given a) budget as gesture of goodwill,&#8221; Arroyo said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8211;The leadership of the House of Representatives on Wednesday assured the public that there is no pork barrel or lump &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":174037,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-filane-mikee-cervantes","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175776"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175776\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/174037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}