{"id":175544,"date":"2018-08-07T22:26:46","date_gmt":"2018-08-08T02:26:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=175544"},"modified":"2018-08-07T22:26:46","modified_gmt":"2018-08-08T02:26:46","slug":"health-care-workers-ask-fords-government-stop-repeal-sex-ed-curriculum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/08\/07\/health-care-workers-ask-fords-government-stop-repeal-sex-ed-curriculum\/","title":{"rendered":"Health care workers ask Ford&#8217;s government to stop repeal of sex ed curriculum"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_175549\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-175549\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/14745416238_c00a14acaa_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-175549\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/14745416238_c00a14acaa_z.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/14745416238_c00a14acaa_z.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/14745416238_c00a14acaa_z-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-175549\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">File Photo: Hundreds of doctors, nurses and social workers are asking the Ontario government to reconsider its plan to repeal and replace a modernized sex-ed curriculum, arguing the decision would put students&#8217; health at risk. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/65764319@N00\/14745416238\/\">Photo<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/65764319@N00\/\">american_rugbier\/Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>TORONTO \u2014 Hundreds of doctors, nurses and social workers are asking the Ontario government to reconsider its plan to repeal and replace a modernized sex-ed curriculum, arguing the decision would put students&#8217; health at risk.<\/p>\n<p>A petition signed by nearly 1,800 health-care workers was delivered to the provincial legislature Tuesday by NDP Leader Andrea Horwath.<\/p>\n<p>Scrapping the sex-ed curriculum updated by the previous Liberal government in 2015 was one of the main campaign promises of Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford during the spring election. His government has said it will launch a provincewide public consultation in September on a new lesson plan. Until one is drafted, the government has asked schools to teach an older version of the curriculum that was last updated in 1998.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Andrea Chittle, a Guelph, Ont.-based family physician representing the group, said the updated plan dealt with issues that are crucial to students&#8217; physical and mental health.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is imperative that children learn about difference and inclusivity, consent and safety,\u201d she said. \u201cThe human development and sexual health components of the 2015 curriculum are critically important for informed decision-making related to health behaviours and relationships.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The updated sex-ed curriculum included warnings about online bullying and sexting, but protesters, especially social conservatives, took issue with parts of the plan that talked about same-sex marriage, gender identity and masturbation.<\/p>\n<p>During the campaign, Ford accused the Liberals of introducing a sex curriculum based on ideology, saying they had turned schools into social laboratories and kids into test subjects. He promised a Tory government would replace the curriculum with a teaching plan that was \u201cage appropriate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chittle said the province had already been through a substantial delay to rewrite the curriculum in 2010 when the then-Liberal government of former premier Dalton McGuinty halted a planned update that was eventually finalized in 2015.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe had a five year gap where students went back to the 1998 inadequate curriculum and were not being given up-to-date, comprehensive, evidence-based sexual and reproductive health information,\u201d Chittle said. \u201cI would posit there&#8217;s been harm from that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to individual workers, groups including the Registered Nurses&#8217; Association of Ontario, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of\u00a0Canada\u00a0and the Ontario Association of Social Workers have signed the petition.<\/p>\n<p>Horwath said the health-care workers are joining a growing list of people speaking about the controversial Tory plan. With the first day of school just weeks away, children will be hurt by the government&#8217;s decision, she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we don&#8217;t teach children an up-to-date sex-ed curriculum &#8230; we&#8217;re putting our children&#8217;s health at risk,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have a responsibility to give students information that can protect them from cyber bullying, infectious diseases, abuse and we have a responsibility to teach kids about healthy relations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Health Minister Christine Elliott said she welcomed the health-care professionals&#8217; comments, but added parents should also have a voice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cParents know what&#8217;s best for their children,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TORONTO \u2014 Hundreds of doctors, nurses and social workers are asking the Ontario government to reconsider its plan to repeal &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":175549,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-shawn-jeffords","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175544\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/175549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}