{"id":174884,"date":"2018-08-03T22:51:26","date_gmt":"2018-08-04T02:51:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=174884"},"modified":"2018-08-03T22:51:26","modified_gmt":"2018-08-04T02:51:26","slug":"death-penalty-reimposition-remains-palaces-priority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/08\/03\/death-penalty-reimposition-remains-palaces-priority\/","title":{"rendered":"Death penalty reimposition remains Palace\u2019s priority"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_173623\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-173623\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-173623\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Roque-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-173623\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque. (TOTO LOZANO\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; Malaca\u00f1ang on Friday said the reimposition of death penalty for heinous drug-related crimes remains the government\u2019s priority despite Pope Francis\u2019 declaration that capital punishment is \u201cunacceptable\u201d in all cases.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, however, said the revival of the death penalty for serious drug-related offenses is now up to the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is still the priority of the administration to reimpose the death penalty for serious drug-related offenses but the decision, because it was already passed by Congress, is now up to the Senate,\u201d Roque said in a press conference in Malaybalay, Bukidnon.<\/p>\n<p>Roque said President Rodrigo Duterte would still try his &#8220;gentle persuasion&#8221; but \u201cit is the decision of the senators now\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Leader Juan Miguel Zubiri, who hails from Bukidnon, was with Roque at the press briefing but did not comment on death penalty issue.<\/p>\n<p>In March 2017, the House of Representatives passed House Bill No. 4727, seeking to reimpose the death penalty for heinous drug-related offenses.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo we leave it to the Senate whatever decision they may have,\u201d Roque said.<\/p>\n<p>Senate President Vicente &#8220;Tito&#8221; Sotto III previously declared support for the restoration of death penalty for high-level drug trafficking cases.<\/p>\n<p>In 2014, Sotto filed a Senate bill seeking to reimpose capital punishment for \u201cheinous crimes&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 2006.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; Malaca\u00f1ang on Friday said the reimposition of death penalty for heinous drug-related crimes remains the government\u2019s priority despite Pope &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":173623,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174884"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174884\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/173623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}