{"id":174684,"date":"2018-08-02T22:26:54","date_gmt":"2018-08-03T02:26:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=174684"},"modified":"2018-08-02T22:26:54","modified_gmt":"2018-08-03T02:26:54","slug":"how-the-soulpepper-case-changed-cultural-institutions-without-going-to-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/08\/02\/how-the-soulpepper-case-changed-cultural-institutions-without-going-to-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Soulpepper case changed cultural institutions without going to trial"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_174688\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-174688\" style=\"width: 256px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/XMl_de9W_400x400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-174688\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/XMl_de9W_400x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"256\" height=\"256\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/XMl_de9W_400x400.jpg 256w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/XMl_de9W_400x400-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 256px) 100vw, 256px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-174688\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">File Photo: \u201cIt looks like they&#8217;ve achieved that, and I think that that is really important.\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/profile_images\/660079457512906752\/XMl_de9W_400x400.jpg\">Photo<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/MargWaddell\"> Margaret Waddell\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>TORONTO \u2014 They may not have had their day in court, but the actresses who sued the Soulpepper Theatre Company and one of its co-founders over sexual harassment allegations succeeded in changing the company&#8217;s culture, legal experts say, showing the power of civil actions as a tool in the #MeToo movement.<\/p>\n<p>An out-of-court settlement was reached in the lawsuits against Schultz and Soulpepper, all involved parties confirmed Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>While the terms of the settlement have been tightly guarded, lawyer Margaret Waddell, who was not involved in the case, said it&#8217;s clear that the plaintiffs walked away with at least one thing they wanted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTheir objectives, as they stated, were to create a systemic change in the way that (Soulpepper) was operating to create a safe environment,\u201d said Waddell, a partner at Toronto law firm Waddell Phillips.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt looks like they&#8217;ve achieved that, and I think that that is really important.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In January, four actresses filed separate lawsuits accusing former Soulpepper artistic director Albert Schultz of a pattern of sexual harassment at the Toronto non-profit theatre company.<\/p>\n<p>At a press conference, Kristin Booth, Hannah Miller, Diana Bentley and Patricia Fagan said they decided to launch a civil suit in order to change what they alleged was a workplace culture that tolerated sexual harassment.<\/p>\n<p>Schultz resigned and pledged to vehemently defend himself against the allegations. Both he and Soulpepper filed notices of intent to defend in the case.<\/p>\n<p>In the days after the suits were filed, then-Heritage Minister Melanie Joly declared her department was reviewing its funding policies to ensure recipients commit to eliminating sexual misconduct and harassment.<\/p>\n<p>Soulpepper has since taken steps towards cultivating a safer and more inclusive artistic environment, including providing crisis counsellors, setting up a whistleblower hotline and adopting a new code of conduct.<\/p>\n<p>The months-long legal battle prompted self-reflection about the issue of sexual harassment in\u00a0Canada&#8217;s artistic community, with cultural institutions and associations across the country launching anti-harassment initiatives.<\/p>\n<p>And amid these sweeping changes, a court date never materialized.<\/p>\n<p>Karen Busby, a law professor at University of Manitoba, wasn&#8217;t surprised by the Soulpepper outcome \u2014 she said 99 per cent of civil actions never go to a full trial.<\/p>\n<p>There are often powerful incentives on either side of a civil suit to resolve a case outside of court, she said, including the burden of a lengthy judicial process, expensive legal fees, the potential for reputational damage and the risk of re-traumatizing victims on the stand.<\/p>\n<p>The actresses collectively sought $3.6 million in damages from Schultz and $4.25 million from Soulpepper, but Busby said in settlements of similar cases, compensation tends to be in the thousands or tens of thousands.<\/p>\n<p>Waddell said she imagines those figures will creep upwards as the #MeToo movement reshapes perceptions about the consequences of sexual misconduct.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think we&#8217;re recognizing now as a country and within our judicial institutions that those harms are real, and they are no less deserving of compensation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As Waddell proceeds with a class-action lawsuit against the Royal Winnipeg Ballet and a photographer who is alleged to have taken intimate photos of students, she said she thinks civil suits will be an instrument of change in the #MeToo movement, regardless of whether they go to trial.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the institutions now are starting to recognize the problem through these highly publicized pieces of litigation, that&#8217;s good for everybody,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TORONTO \u2014 They may not have had their day in court, but the actresses who sued the Soulpepper Theatre Company &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":174688,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174684","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","mauthors-adina-bresge","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174684"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174684\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/174688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}