{"id":174386,"date":"2018-08-01T02:41:12","date_gmt":"2018-08-01T06:41:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=174386"},"modified":"2018-08-01T02:41:12","modified_gmt":"2018-08-01T06:41:12","slug":"trump-insults-koch-brothers-total-joke-gop-circles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/08\/01\/trump-insults-koch-brothers-total-joke-gop-circles\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump insults Koch brothers as &#8216;total joke&#8217; in GOP circles"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_167400\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-167400\" style=\"width: 513px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/35628635_10161149299840725_7850103003267727360_n-e1529475006451.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-167400\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/35628635_10161149299840725_7850103003267727360_n-e1529475006451.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"513\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/35628635_10161149299840725_7850103003267727360_n-e1529475006451.jpg 513w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/35628635_10161149299840725_7850103003267727360_n-e1529475006451-768x750.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/35628635_10161149299840725_7850103003267727360_n-e1529475006451-20x20.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 513px) 100vw, 513px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-167400\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The presidential insult on Tuesday followed a weekend gathering of Koch officials who repeatedly condemned Trump&#8217;s trade policies, the explosion of government spending under his watch and his divisive tone. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/DonaldTrump\/photos\/a.488852220724.393301.153080620724\/10161149299830725\/?type=3&amp;theater\">File Photo:<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/DonaldTrump\/\">Donald J. Trump\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK \u2014 The war of words intensified between two titans in Republican politics as President Donald Trump trashed the conservative billionaire Koch brothers as a &#8220;total joke in real Republican circles.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The presidential insult on Tuesday followed a weekend gathering of Koch officials who repeatedly condemned Trump&#8217;s trade policies, the explosion of government spending under his watch and his divisive tone.<\/p>\n<p>The intra-party feud could hurt the GOP in this fall&#8217;s midterm elections and beyond. While the Kochs refused to endorse Trump&#8217;s first presidential run, the president&#8217;s loyalists don&#8217;t want his 2020 re-election campaign bogged down by lingering bad blood. The Koch network boasts an army of grassroots activists across 36 states and has promised to spend between $300 million and $400 million on politics and policy this election cycle alone.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The globalist Koch Brothers, who have become a total joke in real Republican circles, are against Strong Borders and Powerful Trade,&#8221; Trump tweeted. &#8220;I never sought their support because I don&#8217;t need their money or bad ideas.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The president later added: &#8220;I&#8217;m for America First &amp; the American Worker \u2014 a puppet for no one. Two nice guys with bad ideas.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Over the weekend, network patriarch, 82-year-old Charles Koch, refused to criticize Trump personally when The Associated Press asked whether the president should bear any responsibility for the divisive tone in Washington.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve had divisiveness long before Trump became president and we&#8217;ll have it long after he&#8217;s no longer president,&#8221; Koch said during a rare question-and-answer session with reporters. &#8220;I&#8217;m into hating the sin and not the sinner.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Responding to Trump&#8217;s social media attack, Koch spokesman James Davis was measured. &#8220;We support policies that help all people improve their lives. We look forward to working with anyone to do so,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>The day before, the Kochs&#8217; political advocacy network announced it would not back the GOP candidate in the North Dakota Senate race, determining that Republican challenger Kevin Cramer&#8217;s record on government spending made him no better than Democratic incumbent Sen. Heidi Heitkamp in the marquee Senate contest.<\/p>\n<p>The Kochs have not ruled out similar moves in top-tier Senate races in Indiana, Missouri, Montana, and West Virginia, although they are actively working to help elect Republican Senate candidates in Florida, Tennessee and Wisconsin.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve got a message for lawmakers across the country. We are raising the bar, raising expectations,&#8221; Koch lieutenant Emily Seidel told donors Monday.<\/p>\n<p>While the move echoed across the political world, Republican operatives quietly dismissed the practical impact of the Koch&#8217;s decision on the North Dakota Senate race, where Cramer&#8217;s campaign believes he has a double-digit lead in the deep-red state against the Democratic incumbent. Yet there is a desire for the Kochs to co-operate with Trump allies in other states, such as Nevada and Montana, where Republican candidates are considered more vulnerable.<\/p>\n<p>Some Trump loyalists were furious at perceived contradictions in the Koch network&#8217;s behaviour and worried that it could complicate the president&#8217;s 2020 re-election.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Kochs had zero to do with Trump&#8217;s win in 2016,&#8221; former White House counsellor Steve Bannon told the AP. &#8220;But they were willing to support the tax cut and the deregulation, while opposing the heart of Trumpism \u2014 trade and immigration.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s animosity toward the Koch brothers, like so much of his anger toward conservative heavyweights, stems from the influential donors&#8217; pointed refusal to support him in the run-up to the 2016 presidential campaign. Back then, he criticized Koch-backed politicians as &#8220;puppets.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tensions remained between the two camps \u2014 in part fueled by the Kochs&#8217; status as key members of the Manhattan donor network, a group that has long rejected Trump, even as the president staffed his administration with a number of Koch alumni.<\/p>\n<p>Trump has complained to confidants that the Kochs &#8220;never respected&#8221; him and &#8220;refused to get on board&#8221; his electoral movement, according to a person familiar with his views but not authorized to discuss private conversations. He has expressed worry that they may try to undermine his administration, the person said.<\/p>\n<p>The president&#8217;s slam against the Koch network came shortly after the departure from the White House of legislative affairs director Marc Short, who was a top Koch network official before joining the administration.<\/p>\n<p>Vice-President Mike Pence, another close Koch ally, has so far been silent on the feud. His office did not respond to a question about Trump&#8217;s Twitter attacks.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Their network is highly overrated,&#8221; Trump charged. &#8220;I have beaten them at every turn.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2014 The war of words intensified between two titans in Republican politics as President Donald Trump trashed the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":167400,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-steve-peoples-and-jonathan-lemire","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174386\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/167400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}