{"id":172930,"date":"2018-07-24T21:01:46","date_gmt":"2018-07-25T01:01:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=172930"},"modified":"2018-07-24T21:01:46","modified_gmt":"2018-07-25T01:01:46","slug":"court-rejects-quebecs-bid-to-ban-citizens-access-to-private-online-gaming-sites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/07\/24\/court-rejects-quebecs-bid-to-ban-citizens-access-to-private-online-gaming-sites\/","title":{"rendered":"Court rejects Quebec’s bid to ban citizens’ access to private online gaming sites"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
File Photo: \u201cThe veritable character (of the law) is to prevent gaming websites not exploited by the government from being accessible, and not about protecting consumers or their health.\u201d (Photo<\/a> by Daniel Matthew\/Flickr<\/a>, CC BY-NC 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MONTREAL \u2014 Quebec’s attempt to ban its citizens’ access to online gaming websites unauthorized by the state-run gambling corporation is unconstitutional because it infringes upon federal jurisdiction, indicated a recent Superior Court ruling.<\/p>\n

The province adopted legislation in 2016 forcing internet service providers to block access to online gambling sites unauthorized by Loto-Quebec, sparking accusations the government was trying to censor part of the internet and violate the concept of net neutrality.<\/p>\n

But Quebec didn’t have the authority to do that because its law touched on telecommunications and criminal law, both federal competencies, the court ruled in a July 18 decision.<\/p>\n

The Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association challenged the legislation \u2014 which had not come into effect \u2014 and said Tuesday it was pleased with the ruling.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson for the CWTA said in an email, \u201cWe have always been clear all Canadians are better served by a proportionate and symmetrical set of federal regulations than a patchwork of provincial regulations.\u201d<\/p>\n

University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, who holds the\u00a0Canada\u00a0Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, said \u201cthe court got it right.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201c(The ruling) sends a strong message to the Quebec government and to any provincial government that might think regulating the internet through mandating blocking schemes is the way to go,\u201d Geist said.<\/p>\n

In the 2015 budget documents, the Finance Department noted Loto-Quebec’s online gambling platform was losing money. The government would, therefore, introduce legislation banning Quebecers’ access to websites unauthorized by the province’s gaming authority.<\/p>\n

Finance Minister Carlos Leitao had said the law was necessary to protect the health and safety of Quebecers because private gambling companies don’t apply the same responsible gaming rules as the provincial government.<\/p>\n

Justice Pierre Nollet saw through Leitao’s argument.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe veritable character (of the law) is to prevent gaming websites not exploited by the government from being accessible, and not about protecting consumers or their health.\u201d<\/p>\n

Geist said he thinks from the moment of its introduction, the law was about increasing Loto-Quebec’s revenues.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd the government wasn’t shy about that until the reality of the court challenge, and then there was this attempt to frame it as a health and safety measure,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Neither Loto-Quebec’s spokesman nor the spokeswoman for the finance minister wanted to comment Tuesday on the ruling.<\/p>\n

Geist said Nollet’s ruling could have an impact on an upcoming decision by the CRTC regarding a demand by a coalition of companies \u2014 including Bell\u00a0Canada\u00a0and the CBC \u2014 for the commission to block websites considered purveyors of pirated creative content.<\/p>\n

Nollet cited the 1993 Telecommunications Act in his decision, which he said enshrines into law the concept of net neutrality.<\/p>\n

\u201cNet neutrality\u201d is understood to mean that internet companies should be neutral carriers of content and not favour some sites over others or block access to certain sites.<\/p>\n

The 1993 act states, \u201cExcept where the Commission (the CRTC) approves otherwise, a Canadian carrier shall not control the content or influence the meaning or purpose of telecommunications carried by it for the public.\u201d<\/p>\n

Nollet’s ruling noted the act requires the CRTC to block sites only under strict circumstances, such as during threats to the network.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are implications (in the ruling) for other site-blocking proposals,\u201d Geist said. \u201cBecause it says the courts understand (the CRTC) by and large, doesn’t block content, and if so, does it under very, very limited circumstances.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MONTREAL \u2014 Quebec’s attempt to ban its citizens’ access to online gaming websites unauthorized by the state-run gambling corporation is …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":172931,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-172930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","mauthors-giuseppe-valiante","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172930\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}