{"id":170909,"date":"2018-07-14T00:56:30","date_gmt":"2018-07-14T04:56:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=170909"},"modified":"2018-07-14T00:56:30","modified_gmt":"2018-07-14T04:56:30","slug":"ltfrb-reiterates-legality-of-p10-m-fine-vs-grab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/07\/14\/ltfrb-reiterates-legality-of-p10-m-fine-vs-grab\/","title":{"rendered":"LTFRB reiterates legality of P10-M fine vs. Grab"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_119698\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-119698\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-119698\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n.png\" alt=\"This as Grab plans to appeal the decision of the LTFRB, maintaining that an order of the Department of Transportation allows TNCs to set their own fare rates subject to the oversight of the Board. (Photo: Grab\/Facebook)\" width=\"960\" height=\"960\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n.png 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12669589_1039876552735353_7735428937390095722_n-768x768.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-119698\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">This as Grab plans to appeal the decision of the LTFRB, maintaining that an order of the Department of Transportation allows TNCs to set their own fare rates subject to the oversight of the Board. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/GrabPH\/photos\/a.537208633002150.1073741825.527357467320600\/1039876552735353\/?type=1&amp;amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/GrabPH\/\">Grab\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) on Thursday reiterated that the PHP10 million fine on ridesharing firm Grab Philippines for overcharging due to the PHP2-per-minute travel charge was in accordance with its regulatory function over the fares of transportation network companies (TNCs) and other modes of public transportation.<\/p>\n<p>This as Grab plans to appeal the decision of the LTFRB, maintaining that an order of the Department of Transportation allows TNCs to set their own fare rates subject to the oversight of the Board.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will stick on the majority rule\u00a0<em>na may paglabag doon sa pag<\/em>-impose\u00a0<em>nila ng<\/em>\u00a0PHP2-per minute (there was a violation when they imposed the PHP2-per minute),&#8221; LTFRB Chairman Martin Delgra III said in an interview with reporters on the sidelines of the launching of the implementation of the Pantawid Pasada Program for jeepney operators and drivers Thursday afternoon.<\/p>\n<p>Grab may be able to file a motion for reconsideration within 15 days upon issuance of the order and may appeal to the Department of Transportation (DOTr) in case this was denied, according to the LTFRB.<\/p>\n<p>In its statement, the ride-hailing firm said that the per minute charge was in accordance with Department Order 2015-011 and that this is still valid.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis DO is valid despite the position of the LTFRB to the contrary. LTFRB has no authority to declare DOTr order invalid. Only the courts, not LTFRB can rule on the validity of an order especially one issued by DOTr which has direct supervision and control over the LTFRB,\u201d Grab public affairs head Leo Gonzales said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is no basis for the fine being imposed by LTFRB. We disagree with the Board\u2019s decision and we will file an appeal to protect the ridesharing industry in the country,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Grab also said the per minute fare was also part of the presentation and discussions during its technical working group meeting with the LTFRB on July 2017 and that the LTFRB Chairman was also informed of the fare structure.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe likewise received an e-mail response from the Office of the Chairman. No concerns were raised by the Board at that time,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n<p>However, Delgra said an e-mail response from his office cannot be seen as approval of the fare structure.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Board is going to decide as to whether we are going to grant a fare increase or not. It\u2019s the Board who\u2019s going to decide, and that\u2019s basically what happened to the taxi fare, to the PUJ,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The Board earlier said there was no mention of any travel time rate, which Grab has been collecting, when it released its order on the fare structure of TNCs in Dec. 27, 2016, which stipulates that the company should impose a flagdown rate of PHP40 with an additional rate of PHP10 to PHP14 per kilometer excluding per-minute travel charges.<\/p>\n<p>In its order dated July 9, the LTFRB said the rebates will be availed only for 20 days from the time the decision becomes final or when Grab shall start its implementation whichever is earlier.<\/p>\n<p>The amount of the rebate is limited to the portion of the income of Grab which is directly related to the PHP2-per minute charge during the period of its imposition.<\/p>\n<p>The per-minute charge was imposed by Grab from June 2, 2017 until Apr. 19, 2018 when it was suspended by the LTFRB.<\/p>\n<p>The DOTr has issued an order last June 11, authorizing the LTFRB to determine the fare, rates and other charges of TNCs after undergoing public hearings and consultations to ensure that they are just and reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>This will ensure that the TNCs will comply with policies, laws, and regulations as the DOTr recognizes their role in providing transport services to the public.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) on Thursday reiterated that the PHP10 million fine on ridesharing firm &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":119698,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[19839,2934],"class_list":["post-170909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-grab","tag-ltfrb","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170909\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}