{"id":168743,"date":"2018-07-02T05:39:15","date_gmt":"2018-07-02T09:39:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=168743"},"modified":"2025-01-31T01:54:12","modified_gmt":"2025-01-31T06:54:12","slug":"malacanang-duterte-says-no-to-same-sex-marriage-yes-to-civil-union","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/07\/02\/malacanang-duterte-says-no-to-same-sex-marriage-yes-to-civil-union\/","title":{"rendered":"Malaca\u00f1ang: Duterte says no to same-sex marriage, yes to civil union"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_168283\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-168283\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-168283\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg\" alt=\"FILE: While Roque said that Duterte is now against same-sex marriage, through the years, the President has been changing his views on the subject. (RICHARD MADELO\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-168283\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: While Roque said that Duterte is now against same-sex marriage, through the years, the President has been changing his views on the subject. (RICHARD MADELO\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The President may not be in favor of same-sex marriage, but the Palace clarified that he nodded to a same-sex civil union.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Kung<\/em> same-sex marriage, <em>pati si<\/em> <em>Presidente tutol. Pero ang<\/em> union, <em>pabor d\u2019yan si Presidente para maayos ang iba\u2019t ibang aspeto ng pagsasama ng magkaparehong kasarinlan <\/em>(If it is about same-sex marriage, even the President is against it. But if it is about a same-sex union, the President is in favor to fix the different aspects of same-sex union),\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, Jr. said in a press briefing on Monday, July 2 in Maasin City, Southern Leyte.<\/p>\n<p>This was the Palace\u2019s reaction to the recent Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey revealing that 61 percent of Filipino adults would oppose a law crafted to allow a civil union of two men or two women.<\/p>\n<p>Sponsored by the ally of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte in the lower chamber House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, a bill allowing same-sex civil union is being created, with the first transwoman lawmaker Bataan Representative Geraldine Roman among its proponents.<\/p>\n<p>According to Roman, the term \u201ccivil union\u201d is used instead of \u201cmarriage\u201d to avoid religious connotations that may ire conservative and religious groups.<\/p>\n<p>While Roque said that Duterte is now against same-sex marriage, through the years, the President has been changing his views on the subject.<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with Vice Ganda back in 2015, the mayor-turned-President was asked about his view on same-sex marriage, to which he answered with, \u201cit\u2019s good\u2026 everyone deserves to be happy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In March 2017, however, Duterte retracted his words, reacting to Time magazine\u2019s article about the difference of \u201che\u201d and \u201cshe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>\u2019Yun ang kultura nila. Eh \u2018di kayo lang, hindi \u2018yan pwede sa amin. Katoliko kami at <\/em>(That is their culture. That cannot be applied to us. We are Catholics and) there is the Civil Code, which says that you can only marry a woman for me.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy fildena online <a href=\"https:\/\/bvhpr.org\/golfevent\/assets\/images\/png\/fildena.html\">https:\/\/bvhpr.org\/golfevent\/assets\/images\/png\/fildena.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p> For a woman to marry a man,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Before 2017 ended though, he once again aired his support for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) community.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou know, <em>kung ano \u2018yung kaligahayahan ng tao, bakit mo pigilan<\/em> (why do you have to block something that makes the people happy)? Why impose a morality that is no longer working? So I am with you,\u201d he said on December 17.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy strattera online <a href=\"https:\/\/nationalconferenceonems.com\/wordpress1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/png\/strattera.html\">https:\/\/nationalconferenceonems.com\/wordpress1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/png\/strattera.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The President may not be in favor of same-sex marriage, but the Palace clarified that he nodded to a same-sex &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":168283,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[15359,2444,52504,8156,11790],"class_list":["post-168743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-harry-roque","tag-rodrigo-duterte","tag-same-sex-civil-union","tag-same-sex-marriage","tag-social-weather-stations","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalalysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168743"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168743\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":287160,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168743\/revisions\/287160"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/168283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}