{"id":168361,"date":"2018-06-30T01:31:12","date_gmt":"2018-06-30T05:31:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=168361"},"modified":"2018-06-30T01:31:12","modified_gmt":"2018-06-30T05:31:12","slug":"palace-to-answer-quo-warranto-vs-duterte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/06\/30\/palace-to-answer-quo-warranto-vs-duterte\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace to answer quo warranto vs. Duterte"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_168283\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-168283\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-168283\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg\" alt=\"FILE: Malaca\u00f1ang will respond to the Supreme Court (SC)\u2019s order to President Rodrigo R. Duterte to answer a quo warranto pleading seeking to nullify Duterte\u2019s victory in 2016. (RICHARD MADELO\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/20180628-ph1-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-168283\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Malaca\u00f1ang will respond to the Supreme Court (SC)\u2019s order to President Rodrigo R. Duterte to answer a quo warranto pleading seeking to nullify Duterte\u2019s victory in 2016. (RICHARD MADELO\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2014 Malaca\u00f1ang will respond to the Supreme Court (SC)\u2019s order to President Rodrigo R. Duterte to answer a quo warranto pleading seeking to nullify Duterte\u2019s victory in 2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will respond as ordered,\u201d Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque told the Palace media on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>The SC on Friday reportedly gave Duterte 10 days to comment on the petition filed by suspended lawyer Elly Pamatong.<\/p>\n<p>Pamatong, a former nuisance presidential candidate, claimed Duterte\u2019s certificate of candidacy (COC) was illegal since it was not approved by the Commission on Elections (Comelec).<\/p>\n<p>Duterte was a substitute for Martin Di\u00f1o who withdrew his COC for president. Di\u00f1o is now undersecretary of the Department of Interior and Local Government.<\/p>\n<p>The former mayor for 23 years of Davao City eventually won the presidential election with six million votes margin over his closest rival in the May 2016 polls.<\/p>\n<p>Pamatong filed a quo warranto plea against the President after the SC granted on May 11 a quo warranto petition nullyfing the appointment of Maria Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>Solicitor General Jose Calida filed the quo warranto petition against Sereno over her failure to file statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2014 Malaca\u00f1ang will respond to the Supreme Court (SC)\u2019s order to President Rodrigo R. Duterte to answer a quo warranto &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":168283,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[978,13944,47663],"class_list":["post-168361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-malacanang","tag-president-rodrigo-r-duterte","tag-quo-warranto","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168361\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/168283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}