{"id":166566,"date":"2018-06-07T22:15:19","date_gmt":"2018-06-08T02:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=166566"},"modified":"2018-06-07T22:15:19","modified_gmt":"2018-06-08T02:15:19","slug":"trump-says-kim-summit-all-about-attitude-not-preparation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/06\/07\/trump-says-kim-summit-all-about-attitude-not-preparation\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump says Kim summit all about attitude, not preparation"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\u201cI<\/a>
\u201cI don’t think I have to prepare very much,\u201d Trump said. \u201cIt’s about attitude. It’s about willingness to get things done.\u201d(Photo By: Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>WASHINGTON – Heading into his North Korea summit with characteristic bravado, President Donald Trump said Thursday that \u201cattitude\u201d is more important than preparation as he looks to negotiate an accord with Kim Jong Un to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula.<\/p>\n

Preparing to depart Washington for next week’s meeting, Trump dangled before Kim visions of normalized relations with the United States, economic investment and even a White House visit. Characterizing the upcoming talks with the third-generation autocrat as a \u201cfriendly negotiation,\u201d Trump said, \u201cI really believe that Kim Jong Un wants to do something.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump’s comments came as he looked to reassure allies that he won’t give away the store in pursuit of a legacy-defining deal with Kim, who has long sought to cast off his pariah status on the international stage. The North has faced crippling diplomatic and economic sanctions as it has advanced development of its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don’t think I have to prepare very much,\u201d Trump said. \u201cIt’s about attitude. It’s about willingness to get things done.\u201d<\/p>\n

Declaring the summit to be \u201cmuch more than a photo-op,\u201d he predicted \u201ca terrific success or a modified success\u201d when he meets with Kim next Tuesday in Singapore. He said the talks would start a process to bring about a resolution to the nuclear issue.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it’s not a one-meeting deal,\u201d he said. Asked how many days he’s willing to stay to talk with Kim, Trump said, \u201cOne, two three, depending on what happens.\u201d<\/p>\n

Still he predicted he’ll know very quickly whether Kim is serious about dealing with U.S. demands.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey have to de-nuke,\u201d Trump said. \u201cIf they don’t denuclearize, that will not be acceptable. And we cannot take sanctions off.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump, who coined the term \u201cmaximum pressure\u201d to describe U.S. sanctions against the North, said they would be an indicator for the success or failure of the talks.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe don’t use the term anymore because we’re going into a friendly negotiation,\u201d Trump said. \u201cPerhaps after that negotiation, I will be using it again. You’ll know how well we do in the negotiation. If you hear me saying, ‘We’re going to use maximum pressure,’ you’ll know the negotiation did not do well, frankly.\u201d<\/p>\n

At another point, he said it was \u201cabsolutely\u201d possible he and Kim could sign a declaration to end the Korean War. The 1950-53 conflict ended with an armistice but not a formal peace treaty.<\/p>\n

Trump spent Thursday morning firing off a dozen unrelated tweets – on the Russia investigation and other subjects – before meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to talk about summit preparations and strategy.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think I’ve been prepared for this summit for a long time, as has the other side,\u201d he said. \u201cII think they’ve been preparing for a long time also. So this isn’t a question of preparation, it’s a question of whether or not people want it to happen.\u201d<\/p>\n

Administration officials indicated that Trump actually was putting in preparation time. National Security Council spokesman Garrett Marquis noted the president met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton Thursday afternoon \u201cto continue their strategic discussions\u201d ahead of the summit.<\/p>\n

Pompeo said he was confident the president would be fully prepared and dismissed reports of division inside Trump’s foreign policy team over the decision to embrace the meeting with Kim.<\/p>\n

In his previous role as CIA director, Pompeo told reporters Thursday, \u201cthere were few days that I left the Oval Office, after having briefed the president, that we didn’t talk about North Korea.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pompeo said Kim had \u201cpersonally\u201d given him assurances that he was willing to pursue denuclearization and said U.S. and North Korean negotiating teams had made unspecified progress toward bridging the gap over defining that term as part of a potential agreement. He would not say whether Trump would insist that the North put an end to its chemical, biological and ballistic missile programs.<\/p>\n

Pompeo said Trump’s approach is \u201cfundamentally different\u201d from prior administrations. \u201cIn the past, there’d been months and months of detailed negotiations and they got nowhere,\u201d he said. \u201cThis has already driven us to a place we’d not been able to achieve.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since taking office, Trump has repeatedly accused his predecessors of failing to address the nuclear threat from a nation that launched its atomic program in the 1960s and began producing bomb fuel in the early 1990s. Past administrations have also used a combination of sanctions and diplomacy to seek denuclearization, but the results failed to endure.<\/p>\n

Christopher Hill, the lead U.S. negotiator with North Korea during the George W. Bush administration, said a summit with the North had long been available to U.S. leaders.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fact was no U.S. president wanted to do this, and for good reason,\u201d he said. \u201cIt’s a big coup for (the North Koreans), so the question is whether we can make them pay for it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Before he sits down with Kim, Trump must first face wary U.S. allies who question his commitment to their own security and resent his quarrelling with them on sensitive trade matters. Trump on Friday departs for a 24-hour stop in Canada for a Group of Seven summit of leading industrial nations.<\/p>\n

French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that the international community supports Trump’s efforts to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, but \u201cif he does succeed in his negotiations with North Korea, we want him also to remain credible on the nuclear situation in Iran.\u201d Trump pulled out of President Barack Obama’s nuclear accord with Iran over the objections of European allies.<\/p>\n

Abe, for his part, pushed Trump to raise with Kim the issue of Japanese abductees held in North Korea. The Japanese leader wanted to make sure that Trump’s efforts to negotiate an agreement don’t harm Japan’s interests. Trump said Abe talked about the abductees \u201clong and hard and passionately, and I will follow his wishes and we will be discussing that with North Korea absolutely.\u201d<\/p>\n

U.S. allies in the region have expressed concern that Trump’s push to denuclearize Korea could ignore the North’s sophisticated ballistic missile and chemical weapons programs.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON – Heading into his North Korea summit with characteristic bravado, President Donald Trump said Thursday that \u201cattitude\u201d is more …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":166568,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,1145,16,17],"tags":[5923,14087],"class_list":["post-166566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-headline","category-news","category-news-w","tag-kim-jong-un","tag-president-donald-trump","mauthors-zeke-miller","mauthors-jill-colvin-and-catherine-lucey","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166566"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166566\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/166568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}