{"id":166169,"date":"2018-06-05T04:38:49","date_gmt":"2018-06-05T08:38:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=166169"},"modified":"2018-06-05T04:38:49","modified_gmt":"2018-06-05T08:38:49","slug":"dutertes-controversial-kiss-not-immoral-says-roque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/06\/05\/dutertes-controversial-kiss-not-immoral-says-roque\/","title":{"rendered":"Duterte\u2019s controversial kiss not immoral, says Roque"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>President Rodrigo Duterte is single, thus, him publicly kissing a married woman should not be viewed as an immoral act, defends his spokesman Harry Roque\u00a0on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>The president is currently in hot waters for\u00a0kissing a married Filipina named Bea Kim during his official visit to Seoul, South Korea.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don\u2019t think there\u2019s anything immoral. After all, the President has reiterated he is single,&#8221; Roque said, adding that the only person who has the right to complain of being subjected to humiliation and harassment would be Kim.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf she\u2019s not complaining, I don\u2019t think anyone else should,\u201d Roque insisted, stressing that the \u201cwoman had nothing to say but positive things about the experience.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For those who felt that the act was offensive, Roque said: \u201cSo be it.\u201d<br \/>\n<strong>DAILY NEWS ROUND UP FOR 06\/ 5 \/18<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>President Rodrigo Duterte is single, thus, him publicly kissing a married woman should not be viewed as an immoral act, &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":114184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-uncategorized","mauthors-ro-angelica-equio","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166169\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/114184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}