{"id":163390,"date":"2018-05-11T22:47:04","date_gmt":"2018-05-12T02:47:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=163390"},"modified":"2018-05-11T22:47:04","modified_gmt":"2018-05-12T02:47:04","slug":"respect-supreme-court-ruling-to-oust-sereno-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/05\/11\/respect-supreme-court-ruling-to-oust-sereno-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"Respect Supreme Court ruling to oust Sereno: Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_160910\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-160910\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-160910\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1.jpg\" alt=\"FILE: Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque Jr. issued this statement after President Rodrigo Duterte on Sunday, April 29, announced that Kuwait deployment ban \u201cstays permanently.\u201d (PCOO photo)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"899\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Harry-Roque-1-1024x682.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-160910\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Roque said the SC, as co-equal branch of government, is duty-bound to uphold the Constitution (PCOO photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang on Friday implored the public to respect the Supreme Court (SC) decision granting the quo warranto petition to remove Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno.<\/p>\n<p>The SC en banc on Friday voted, 8-6, in favor of the quo warranto petition filed against Sereno by Solicitor General Jose Calida on Mar. 5, 2018.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe SC is the final arbiter of the law. The High Court has spoken. Let us respect its decision granting the quo warranto petition as the proper remedy and the quo warranto petition ruling against Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said in a press statement.<\/p>\n<p>Roque said the SC, as co-equal branch of government, is duty-bound to uphold the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe court ruling is likewise an assertion of the supremacy of the fundamental law of the land,\u201d Roque said.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Chief Legal Counsel Atty. Salvador Panelo said the public \u201cmust bow to the majesty of the law\u201d and not allow themselves to be controlled by their emotions and biases.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Constitution has given the duty of interpreting the law to the highest court of the land and we must abide by it regardless of our disagreement with its ruling. That is how democracy works,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDura lex sed lex or \u2018the law may be harsh, but it is the law\u201d. Decisions cannot be based on emotions nor on biases,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo said the SC ruled in favor of the quo warranto petition because \u201cthis case also involves Ms. Sereno\u2019s qualifications, i.e., her integrity\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cApart from the constitutional requirement that public officers should file their SALN, (statement of assets, liabilities and networth) a person seeking to be a member of the SC before he or she qualifies to be a nominee to such office must submit all SALNs during the tenure in public office as required by the rules of the Judicial and Bar Council,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe SC in issuing such ruling is only performing its constitutional duty of interpreting the provisions of the Constitution and rendering a decision on cases properly brought before it,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo reiterated that Malaca\u00f1ang has nothing to do with the filing of the quo warranto petition against Sereno, saying it was Calida\u2019s own initiative based on Sereno\u2019s invalid appointment.<\/p>\n<p>Associate Justices Teresita Leonardo De Castro, Diosdado Peralta, Lucas Bersamin, Francis Jardeleza, Noel Tijam, Samuel Martires, Andres Reyes Jr, and Alexander Gesmundo voted in favor of quo warranto petition.<\/p>\n<p>The oppositors include Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and Associate Justices Presbitero Velasco Jr., Mariano del Castillo, Estela Perlas Bernabe, Marvic Leonen, and Benjamin Caguioa.<\/p>\n<p>Sereno, the first woman to hold the country\u2019s top post in the judiciary, also emerged as the first Chief Justice to be ousted through quo waranto petition.<\/p>\n<p>Appointed in 2012 by former President Benigno Aquino III, Sereno replaced former Chief Justice Renato Corona who was ousted through impeachment in December 2011.<\/p>\n<p>Sereno also faces impeachment case but with SC ruling, Panelo said there is no reason now for the House of Representatives to continue the impeachment proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang on Friday implored the public to respect the Supreme Court (SC) decision granting the quo warranto petition to &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":160910,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[15359,11555,50790,978,1144],"class_list":["post-163390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-harry-roque","tag-jose-calida","tag-ma-lourdes-sereno","tag-malacanang","tag-supreme-court","mauthors-jelly-musico","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163390\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/160910"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}