{"id":161742,"date":"2018-04-26T06:14:49","date_gmt":"2018-04-26T10:14:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=161742"},"modified":"2018-04-26T06:14:49","modified_gmt":"2018-04-26T10:14:49","slug":"royal-wedding-dress-will-meghan-go-trendy-or-classic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/04\/26\/royal-wedding-dress-will-meghan-go-trendy-or-classic\/","title":{"rendered":"Royal wedding dress: Will Meghan go trendy or classic?"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_161744\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-161744\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bridal-1867900_640.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-161744\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bridal-1867900_640.jpg\" alt=\"With less than a month to go until she marries Prince Harry at Windsor Castle on May 19, Meghan Markle most likely has already chosen her wedding dress - though what it looks like is expected to remain a top secret until the last minute. (Pixabay photo)\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bridal-1867900_640.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bridal-1867900_640-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-161744\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">With less than a month to go until she marries Prince Harry at Windsor Castle on May 19, Meghan Markle most likely has already chosen her wedding dress &#8211; though what it looks like is expected to remain a top secret until the last minute. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>LONDON &#8211; A dramatic ball gown, or a classic, simple silhouette? Sleeves, or bare shoulders?<\/p>\n<p>With less than a month to go until she marries Prince Harry at Windsor Castle on May 19, Meghan Markle most likely has already chosen her wedding dress &#8211; though what it looks like is expected to remain a top secret until the last minute.<\/p>\n<p>Whoever the designer might be, Markle&#8217;s shopping experience is sure to be vastly different from most brides out there. London&#8217;s most upscale bridal retailers explain what it really takes to create a luxury gown fit for a royal wedding, and weigh in on whether Markle will go classic or embrace one of 2018&#8217;s popular bridal trends.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>THE SKY&#8217;S THE LIMIT<\/p>\n<p>Royal brides don&#8217;t generally pick ready-made dresses off the rail. Instead, Markle is likely to have commissioned an exclusive designer dress tailored to her shape and tastes &#8211; and chances are it will be handmade in Britain.<\/p>\n<p>A luxury couture dress like that typically takes months of painstaking preparation and a small army of fitters and seamstresses, and can easily cost hundreds of thousands of pounds.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you were to commission a couture made dress, you need to have a lot of trust in the designer and a lot of money. Because the cost of the labour involved in making your dress is tremendous. You should expect to start from 30,000 pounds ($42,000) and keep going up to as much as 300,000 pounds,\u201d said Caroline Burstein, owner of London&#8217;s Browns Bride, which sells some of the most exclusive and stylish bridal wear in the capital.<\/p>\n<p>It all adds up: Silks are very expensive, as are British labour costs. A top-quality bespoke dress typically starts with a consultation to explore what styles fit the bride, followed by precise measurements and several initial fittings done in a mock-up fabric, according to leading London bridal designer Phillipa Lepley.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf it were a royal wedding we&#8217;d do maybe three fittings to make sure everything&#8217;s to the millimeter, absolutely right,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Then comes the labour-intensive part: When seamstresses work on the embroidery artwork and lace. More fittings follow to decide details such as where exactly the neckline sits and how many layers of petticoats are needed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor a really exclusive dress it could take 60 hours plus (of labour), it depends on the embroidery. If it&#8217;s embroidered all over we&#8217;re talking hundreds of hours. The sky&#8217;s the limit,\u201d Lepley said. \u201cIt really is very old-fashioned and all done by hand. It&#8217;s unbelievable how many hours things take.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>3-D PETALS OR CLEAN AND SIMPLE?<\/p>\n<p>Romantic, soft and whimsical styles with 3-D details like petals are popular with many brides right now, experts say. But traditional shapes like a ball gown or a column silhouette never go out of style, and many who have watched Markle&#8217;s style have a hunch she might go for something unfussy and streamlined.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBall gowns are forever popular, because they look so incredibly dramatic. If you can&#8217;t make an entrance on your wedding day when can you?\u201d Burstein said. \u201cLace is always a strong trend and at the moment you&#8217;ll see a lot of 3-D petals that give the dresses so much life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lepley said that she hoped Markle would choose \u201csomething not too over-designed.\u201d She showed off one of her luxury duchess satin gowns with no embellishments, with just a striking picture collar framing the bride&#8217;s face. \u201cThis would be amazing,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI got a feeling she&#8217;d probably like to go quite straight and simple, but she might end up going much bigger because of the drama, the size of the venue,\u201d Lepley said. \u201cShe&#8217;s got to hit it just right hasn&#8217;t she? Not too ornate, not the dress wearing her. She still needs to shine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Susan Courter, who runs WhatMeghanWore.net, a popular website identifying Markle&#8217;s choice of apparel in each public appearance, agreed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI&#8217;m thinking there&#8217;ll be clean lines, a tailored look, very chic. That&#8217;s who she is,\u201d Courter said. \u201cI don&#8217;t think there will be a lot of lace, maybe a little bit of whimsical touches to represent her personality.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>THE ROYAL EFFECT<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no denying the huge effect royal weddings have on what brides everywhere want to wear.<\/p>\n<p>Princess Diana&#8217;s 1981 wedding gown, with its puff sleeves, romantic ruffles and dramatic train, defined the 1980s fairytale bridal look. More recently, when Kate Middleton married Prince William in 2011, the long-sleeved lace gown she chose sparked a trend for more covered-up, traditional bridal dresses that lasted for years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think people tend to be, &#8216;Yes I want to follow that through, or I totally don&#8217;t want to be like that at all,\u201d&#8217; Lepley said of the royal effect. \u201cYou get a double reaction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Markle has already set herself apart from traditional royal style, ditching classic frocks for trousers on several royal engagements. If she picks something similarly bold for her wedding, it&#8217;s sure to make a fashion statement, Burstein said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe may not go for a long dress at all, but a beautifully tailored dress and coat. That would send a huge message and no doubt there would be a dramatic shift in what a bride would choose after this wedding,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>And as an established actress known for her love of fashion, Markle&#8217;s wedding style will appeal to a broad audience &#8211; likely surpassing the \u201cKate effect,\u201d Courter said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe&#8217;ve seen the frenzy with what she wears for all these engagements,\u201d she said. \u201cI can really see these brides are going to be running out and saying &#8216;I want that look, how can I get it?\u201d&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>LONDON &#8211; A dramatic ball gown, or a classic, simple silhouette? Sleeves, or bare shoulders? With less than a month &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":161744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[35698],"class_list":["post-161742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-fashion-and-beauty","tag-meghan-markle","mauthors-sylvia-hui","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161742"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161742\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/161744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}