{"id":159465,"date":"2018-04-10T02:35:14","date_gmt":"2018-04-10T06:35:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=159465"},"modified":"2018-04-10T02:35:14","modified_gmt":"2018-04-10T06:35:14","slug":"nova-scotia-cannabis-legislation-to-move-ahead-without-amendments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/04\/10\/nova-scotia-cannabis-legislation-to-move-ahead-without-amendments\/","title":{"rendered":"Nova Scotia cannabis legislation to move ahead without amendments"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_136643\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-136643\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/seedling-1062908_960_720.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-136643\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/seedling-1062908_960_720.jpg\" alt=\"The legislature's law amendments committee was told Monday that rules around the public consumption of pot under the new Cannabis Control Act should be the same as those for open alcohol, meaning smoking would be banned in all outdoor public spaces. (Pixabay photo) \" width=\"960\" height=\"639\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/seedling-1062908_960_720.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/seedling-1062908_960_720-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/seedling-1062908_960_720-768x511.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-136643\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The legislature&#8217;s law amendments committee was told Monday that rules around the public consumption of pot under the new Cannabis Control Act should be the same as those for open alcohol, meaning smoking would be banned in all outdoor public spaces. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>HALIFAX \u2014 Legislation governing legalized cannabis in Nova Scotia is moving ahead, despite calls from several health groups for the Liberal government to strengthen provisions governing where the drug can be smoked in public.<\/p>\n<p>The legislature&#8217;s law amendments committee was told Monday that rules around the public consumption of pot under the new Cannabis Control Act should be the same as those for open alcohol, meaning smoking would be banned in all outdoor public spaces.<\/p>\n<p>The government has said it is expanding the Smoke-free Places Act to ban smoking or vaping of cannabis near playgrounds, publicly owned sport and recreation sites, public trails, and provincial parks and beaches \u2014 except within a rented campsite.<\/p>\n<p>But groups such as the Lung Association of Nova Scotia, Injury Free Nova Scotia and the IWK Children&#8217;s Hospital say those restrictions don&#8217;t go far enough, and send the wrong message about the health effects of smoking pot in public.<\/p>\n<p>Sharon MacIntosh, who worked in tobacco control for 35 years, said the province should institute a total prohibition in outdoor public spaces.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSix provinces in Canada have already legislated that there be no cannabis use is public places, while another three have prohibited cannabis use in areas frequented by children,\u201d she told the committee.<\/p>\n<p>John Traves, legal counsel for the Halifax Regional Municipality, said the rules around public consumption should be left to the province and not municipalities, as called for in the legislation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe challenge with municipalities taking this on &#8230; (is) that you will end up with a patchwork of different bylaws across the province,\u201d said Traves. \u201cYou will have higher than necessary cost of enforcement, and quite frankly municipal bylaw matters do not achieve the same level of interest from policing as do provincial offences.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Traves told the committee that Halifax estimates a startup cost of about one million dollars, with an annual cost of $3 million to implement legalized marijuana rules and enforcement.<\/p>\n<p>However, Justice Minister Mark Furey told reporters the bill would move ahead as is, because the government believes it strikes the right balance in addressing various concerns around the legalization of marijuana.<\/p>\n<p>Furey, a former RCMP officer, said he believes a complete prohibition on public consumption would only serve to tie up police resources in order to enforce it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don&#8217;t see prohibition solving the problem,\u201d he said. \u201cIf anything, prohibition, given my past experience, would actually precipitate additional calls for police response.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HALIFAX \u2014 Legislation governing legalized cannabis in Nova Scotia is moving ahead, despite calls from several health groups for the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":136643,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[4267,49502,49501,3805],"class_list":["post-159465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","tag-cannabis","tag-cannabis-control-act","tag-health-groups","tag-nova-scotia","mauthors-keith-doucette","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159465\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/136643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}