{"id":158300,"date":"2018-03-26T23:37:00","date_gmt":"2018-03-27T03:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=158300"},"modified":"2018-03-26T23:37:00","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T03:37:00","slug":"b-c-makes-changes-to-speculation-tax-after-criticism-from-homeowners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/26\/b-c-makes-changes-to-speculation-tax-after-criticism-from-homeowners\/","title":{"rendered":"B.C. makes changes to speculation tax after criticism from homeowners"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_155675\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-155675\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/shutterstock_1040132809.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-155675\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/shutterstock_1040132809.jpg\" alt=\"The speculation tax is intended to improve housing affordability in areas where the need is most acute, while exempting rural cabins and vacation homes, James said. \u201cWe have a responsibility as a government to ensure that hard working British Columbians can afford to call this province home,\u201d she added. (Shutterstock)\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/shutterstock_1040132809.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/shutterstock_1040132809-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/shutterstock_1040132809-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-155675\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The speculation tax is intended to improve housing affordability in areas where the need is most acute, while exempting rural cabins and vacation homes, James said. \u201cWe have a responsibility as a government to ensure that hard working British Columbians can afford to call this province home,\u201d she added. (Shutterstock)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>VICTORIA &#8211; British Columbia is trying to more directly target urban areas with changes it announced Monday to a proposed tax on property speculation after some municipalities demanded exemptions and the Opposition accused the New Democrats of grabbing family assets.<\/p>\n<p>Finance Minister Carol James is also adjusting the tax rate after first announcing details of the levy in the budget last month.<\/p>\n<p>The changes would create a number of exemptions and shift which areas of the province would be covered by the tax.<\/p>\n<p>Under the details announced by James, the tax would apply to properties in Metro Vancouver, Kelowna, West Kelowna, Nanaimo-Lantzville, Abbotsford, Chilliwack, Mission and the Capital Regional District around Victoria on southern Vancouver Island, excluding the Gulf Islands and Juan de Fuca.<\/p>\n<p>The speculation tax is intended to improve housing affordability in areas where the need is most acute, while exempting rural cabins and vacation homes, James said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a responsibility as a government to ensure that hard working British Columbians can afford to call this province home,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n<p>The changes are due to be introduced in legislation this fall.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOver 99 per cent of British Columbians will not pay the tax,\u201d said James. \u201cOnly those who hold multiple properties and leave them empty in our province&#8217;s major cities will be asked to contribute.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In 2018, the rate for all properties subject to the tax would be set at 0.5 per cent of a property&#8217;s assessed value, regardless of whether the owner is foreign, Canadian or from B.C.<\/p>\n<p>Starting in 2019, the tax rate would be set at two per cent for foreign investors and extended family members.<\/p>\n<p>For Canadian citizens and permanent residents who do not live in British Columbia, the tax rate would rise to one per cent of a property&#8217;s assessed value next year.<\/p>\n<p>B.C. residents with second properties are also eligible for tax credits valued up to $400,000, said James. The tax credit is meant to offset the tax of $2,000 on a property valued under $400,000.<\/p>\n<p>James said people who rent out their second property for at least six months of the year will not have to pay the speculation tax.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe speculation tax focuses on people who are treating our housing market like a stock market,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>James said the government estimates the tax will generate about $200 million in revenue next year.<\/p>\n<p>Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson said the minority NDP government appears to be taking a trial and error approach to tax policy, which does not inspire confidence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey seem to think they can attack speculation with a tax that is not about speculation,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Green Leader Andrew Weaver said the changes \u201cgo a long way\u201d to dealing with his party&#8217;s concerns about the tax.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn particular, the government&#8217;s policy must target speculation and empty homes in our urban centres without undue adverse effects on rural areas and on British Columbians who aren&#8217;t speculators,\u201d he said in a news release.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey make it much more targeted and limit the effects on British Columbians with vacation homes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VICTORIA &#8211; British Columbia is trying to more directly target urban areas with changes it announced Monday to a proposed &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":155675,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[2266,49090,49087,19070,15862,2680,49089,49088],"class_list":["post-158300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-abbotsford","tag-chilliwack","tag-finance-minister-carol-james","tag-kelowna","tag-metro-vancouver","tag-mission","tag-nanaimo-lantzville","tag-west-kelowna","mauthors-dirk-meissner","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158300"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158300\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155675"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}