{"id":157993,"date":"2018-03-24T03:54:36","date_gmt":"2018-03-24T07:54:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=157993"},"modified":"2018-03-24T03:54:36","modified_gmt":"2018-03-24T07:54:36","slug":"gop-in-control-but-dems-budget-priorities-are-winning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/24\/gop-in-control-but-dems-budget-priorities-are-winning\/","title":{"rendered":"GOP in control, but Dems&#8217; budget priorities are winning"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_148369\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-148369\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/usa-1561757_960_720.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-148369\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/usa-1561757_960_720.jpg\" alt=\"Under President Barack Obama and a GOP-controlled Congress, Capitol Hill Democrats had to scratch and claw for months to get tiny increases for domestic programs \u2014 or just hold them level. (Pixabay photo)\" width=\"960\" height=\"642\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/usa-1561757_960_720.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/usa-1561757_960_720-300x201.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/usa-1561757_960_720-768x514.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-148369\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Under President Barack Obama and a GOP-controlled Congress, Capitol Hill Democrats had to scratch and claw for months to get tiny increases for domestic programs \u2014 or just hold them level. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 Under President Barack Obama and a GOP-controlled Congress, Capitol Hill Democrats had to scratch and claw for months to get tiny increases for domestic programs \u2014 or just hold them level.<\/p>\n<p>The $1.3 trillion government-wide funding bill signed by President Donald Trump on Friday gave them almost everything they wanted.<\/p>\n<p>Big fights in 2016 over $1.1 billion emergency funding to battle the Zika virus or $170 million to deal with Flint, Michigan&#8217;s lead-poisoned water look pretty silly in retrospect.<\/p>\n<p>Then, just keeping programs like Head Start, child care grants, and heating subsidies for the poor funded at prior-year levels required months-long battles \u2014 backstopped by Obama veto threats.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou had to fight for every dollar,\u201d said the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy.<\/p>\n<p>The times certainly have changed. Democrats have gone from battling for every scrap to reaping a full-course meal under Trump.<\/p>\n<p>In the spending bill that rapidly passed last week, so-called TIGER grants \u2014 a transportation projects grant program created by Obama&#8217;s much-maligned 2009 economic stimulus bill \u2014 were tripled from $500 million to $1.5 billion. Grants for child care programs got a $2.4 billion increase that almost doubled the size of the program. Mass transit funding got a $1.1 billion increase, while Army Corps of Engineers water and flood control projects received a $789 million, 13 per cent increase. There&#8217;s a more than $2 billion increase in spending for federal student aid and other higher education programs.<\/p>\n<p>Trump said on Twitter that he had to \u201cwaste money on Dem giveaways\u201d to get what he wanted on defence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWaste money on Dem giveaways&#8217;? Would he call funding our heroic veterans &#8216;Dem giveaways&#8217;? Affordable childcare for hardworking middle-class families? Life-saving medical research, which creates jobs? The integrity of America&#8217;s elections?\u201d said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.<\/p>\n<p>The increases for non-defence programs \u2014 $52 billion more than current levels, or 10 per cent \u2014 not only erased the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration but smashed through a more generous set of budget \u201ccaps\u201d originally set under the 2011 budget pact.<\/p>\n<p>Trump admitted on Friday that Democrats had him over a barrel.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are a lot of things that we shouldn&#8217;t have had in this bill, but we were, in a sense, forced \u2014 if we want to build our military \u2014 we were forced to have,\u201d Trump said Friday afternoon in a White House event after he signed the bill.<\/p>\n<p>For Republicans, the months-long showdown over the budget played out in slow motion. All along, GOP leaders were confronted by demands from Republican defence hawks for huge increases in defence spending. Since Republicans needed Democratic votes to pass any spending bill, top Democratic leaders like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were able to demand comparable increases for domestic programs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s more a story about pressures on defence spending,\u201d said Rohit Kumar, a former top aide to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. \u201cThat then, in turn, gave leverage to House and Senate Democrats who used it to their maximum ability.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The seeds of the budget-busting measure were sown seven years ago after enactment of a hard-fought budget and debt deal between Obama and Republicans. In those talks, then-Speaker John Boehner had laid down an edict that any increase in the national debt be matched by equal cuts to spending and the deficit.<\/p>\n<p>After an attempt by Boehner and Obama in the summer of 2011 to forge a \u201cgrand bargain\u201d on the budget failed, under-the-gun negotiators devised a plan to establish a budget \u201csupercommittee\u201d to come up with an alternative. But when the supercommittee failed, big automatic spending cuts known as sequestration took effect.<\/p>\n<p>Those cuts set the precedent that any spending relief would be equally split between defence and nondefense programs. Another agreement for 2017 only deepened the impact of this year&#8217;s automatic cuts.<\/p>\n<p>With defence programs facing a freeze but lacking leverage over Democrats, the bidding began. In the end, a bipartisan budget pact sealed last month set up a two-year framework to break the caps again, for 2018 and 2019. The 2,000 page-plus catchall spending bill signed by Trump on Friday filled in the details.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are growing the size of government at a break-neck pace,\u201d said conservative Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C. \u201cThis is not the limited government conservatism our voters demand.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 Under President Barack Obama and a GOP-controlled Congress, Capitol Hill Democrats had to scratch and claw for months &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":148369,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,16],"tags":[631,48953,10877],"class_list":["post-157993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-news","tag-budget","tag-capitol-hill-democrats","tag-gop","mauthors-andrew-taylor","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157993"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157993\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/148369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}