{"id":156999,"date":"2018-03-17T02:33:09","date_gmt":"2018-03-17T06:33:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=156999"},"modified":"2018-03-17T02:33:09","modified_gmt":"2018-03-17T06:33:09","slug":"vatican-convicts-ex-guam-archbishop-accused-of-abuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/17\/vatican-convicts-ex-guam-archbishop-accused-of-abuse\/","title":{"rendered":"Vatican convicts ex Guam archbishop accused of abuse"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"His<\/a>
FILE: His Excellency, The Most Reverend, Anthony Sablan Apuron, OFM Cap., D.D. (Photo By Monkey2000 – Own work, CC BY 3.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Friday removed the suspended Guam archbishop from office and ordered him not to return to the Pacific island after convicting him of some charges in a sex abuse trial.<\/p>\n

The Vatican didn’t say what exactly Archbishop Anthony Apuron had been convicted of, and the sentence was far lighter than those given high-profile elderly prelates found guilty of molesting minors. It amounts to an early retirement anywhere in the world but Guam, a remote U.S. Pacific territory where nearly everyone is Roman Catholic.<\/p>\n

Apuron is 72, while the Vatican retirement age is 75.<\/p>\n

The Vatican spokesman declined to comment. Calls placed to the tribunal judge weren’t answered. Apuron’s whereabouts weren’t immediately known.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile I am relieved that the tribunal dismissed the majority of the accusations against me, I have appealed the verdict,\u201d said a statement from Apuron distributed by his Guam attorney, Jacqueline Terlaje. \u201cGod is my witness; I am innocent and I look forward to proving my innocence in the appeals process.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pope Francis named a temporary administrator for Guam in 2016 after Apuron was accused by former altar boys of sexually abusing them when he was a priest. Dozens of cases involving other priests on the island have since come to light, and the archdiocese is facing more than $115 million in civil lawsuits alleging child sexual abuse by priests.<\/p>\n

Apuron strongly denied the charges and said he was a victim of a \u201ccalumny\u201d campaign. He wasn’t criminally charged. The statute of limitations had expired.<\/p>\n

A statement from the tribunal in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which handles sex abuse cases, said Apuron had been convicted of some of the accusations against him. It said he had been ordered removed from office and could no longer live in the archdiocese of Guam.<\/p>\n

Under an appeal, the penalties could be suspended until the case is resolved. However, it’s not clear whether that has happened now that Apuron has indicated he has appealed.<\/p>\n

In the past, when an elderly or infirm priest has been convicted by the Vatican of sexually abusing minors, he has often been removed from ministry and sentenced to a lifetime of \u201cpenance and prayer.\u201d Younger priests convicted of abuse have been defrocked, removed from ministry or forbidden from presenting themselves as priests.<\/p>\n

Francis, however, has intervened in a handful of cases to lower sentences, and several high-ranking Vatican prelates oppose defrocking convicted molesters and have long lobbied for more lenient sentences.<\/p>\n

In the case of Apuron, no restrictions on his ministry as a priest were announced.<\/p>\n

An ailing Apuron greeted Francis at the pope’s Feb. 7 general audience.<\/p>\n

Apuron is one of the highest-ranking churchmen to be convicted by a Vatican sex abuse tribunal, and his rank as archbishop may have played a role in his seemingly light sentence.<\/p>\n

Assuming the evidence against him was grave and credible, the Vatican might still have been reluctant to remove him from the clerical state, as it has done in hundreds of cases of defrocked priestly abusers, because Apuron would still remain a bishop theologically speaking, noted Kurt Martens, professor of canon law at Catholic University of America in Washington.<\/p>\n

That means he could continue ordaining priests — ordinations that would be considered illicit but still valid — a schismatic conflict the Vatican would want to avoid.<\/p>\n

The Catholic community on Guam has been convulsed by the Apuron scandal, with weekly protests demanding his ouster.<\/p>\n

One of the former altar servers who accused Apuron of molesting him said he felt relieved by the Vatican’s announcement.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe verdict was what we were hoping for,\u201d Roland Sondia said from Guam, where it was already Saturday. \u201cI think the fact that he won’t be able to return to the island is justice.\u201d<\/p>\n

While The Associated Press doesn’t typically name victims of sex abuse, Sondia has come forward publicly identifying himself as one of Apuron’s accusers.<\/p>\n

Sondia still considers himself Catholic and attends Mass. \u201cI just hope with this that the Catholic Church will work toward being whole again,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The accusations against Apuron also involved grave financial problems in the archdiocese and the purchase of a valuable property by Apuron for a diocesan seminary that he actually turned over to a controversial Catholic movement.<\/p>\n

A lay group that agitated for Apuron’s removal, \u201cConcerned Catholics of Guam,\u201d pushed for an investigation into the archdiocesan seminary, which Apuron opened in 1999 and moved to an 18-acre (seven-hectare) property thanks to a $2 million anonymous donation.<\/p>\n

A Vatican-backed inquiry found the property’s control had effectively been transferred to Neocatechumenal Way administrators without Vatican approval.<\/p>\n

The seminary controversy came to a head when the Carmelite order of religious sisters revealed it had provided the $2 million donation, but said the money had been intended for an archdiocesan seminary to train diocesan priests, not a Neocatechumenal Way seminary to train missionaries.<\/p>\n

In a remarkable 2016 news conference to denounce the transfer, Carmelite Mother Superior Dawn Marie announced that her small community of nuns had left the island after a 50-year presence because of the \u201ctoxic environment\u201d created by the controversy.<\/p>\n

Melinda Burke, a parishioner of Dulce Nombre de Maria Cathedral-Basilica — Guam’s mother church where Apuron is pastor– said she was worried about Apuron’s health when she heard he was found guilty.<\/p>\n

\u201cI love him very much,\u201d she said. \u201cArchbishop Apuron has a very beautiful, Christ-like side. He helped me when everyone else, including priests, turned me away, brought me back to emotional and spiritual health and made me feel welcome in Guam’s Catholic Church and on Guam.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Friday removed the suspended Guam archbishop from office and ordered him not to return …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":157000,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[48480,20804,1829],"class_list":["post-156999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-anthony-apuron","tag-guam","tag-vatican","mauthors-nicole-winfield","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156999\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/157000"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}