{"id":156403,"date":"2018-03-13T20:10:54","date_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:10:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=156403"},"modified":"2018-03-13T20:10:54","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:10:54","slug":"pompeo-a-hawkish-pick-could-give-state-department-new-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/13\/pompeo-a-hawkish-pick-could-give-state-department-new-life\/","title":{"rendered":"Pompeo, a hawkish pick, could give State Department new life"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\u201cOne<\/a>
\u201cOne of the most important jobs for the secretary of state is to make clear to the world the president’s policies and priorities,\u201d Sen. Lindsey Graham, an establishment Republican and initial Tillerson backer, said Tuesday, after Trump announced via tweet that Pompeo would replace Tillerson. \u201cNo one has a stronger relationship with President Trump than Mike Pompeo. This relationship will empower him throughout his tenure as secretary of state.\u201d (Photo By Central Intelligence Agency, Public Domain)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON – Mike Pompeo’s hawkish instincts may seem at odds with traditional diplomatic norms. But after 14 demoralizing months of budget cuts and staffing reductions for the State Department, his conservative political bent and closeness to President Donald\u00a0Trump\u00a0could breathe new vigour into an agency all too often sidelined on many of the nation’s most pressing national security matters.<\/p>\n

Pompeo, the outgoing CIA chief, will bring a new, blunt-speaking style to the job of secretary of state, strikingly different from Rex Tillerson’s understated approach. Pompeo’s arrival in Foggy Bottom also promises far more aggressive stances on Iran and North Korea, and he’ll at least start with\u00a0Trump’s full confidence – something Tillerson never enjoyed.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the most important jobs for the secretary of state is to make clear to the world the president’s policies and priorities,\u201d Sen. Lindsey Graham, an establishment Republican and initial Tillerson backer, said Tuesday, after\u00a0Trump\u00a0announced via tweet that Pompeo would replace Tillerson. \u201cNo one has a stronger relationship with President\u00a0Trump\u00a0than Mike Pompeo. This relationship will empower him throughout his tenure as secretary of state.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tillerson had been widely criticized for an aloof management style, which had alienated droves of career diplomats and driven many of the agency’s senior brass into early retirements. But his foreign policy was far less controversial, as he hewed to much of the agency’s pragmatic approach, from climate change to free trade agreements, and to preserving the Iran nuclear deal, even when that put him at odds with his president and his most conservative supporters.<\/p>\n

In Pompeo, the diplomats and civil servants who make up the 70,000-strong department may now encounter the opposite: a fiercely partisan veteran of some of the most bitter battles in Congress while he was a House Republican, and someone willing to jeopardize his reputation to defend\u00a0Trump, as evidenced when he called up journalists to try to discredit a New York Times story outlining\u00a0Trump\u00a0campaign connections to Russia.<\/p>\n

But Pompeo also helped engineer a detente between\u00a0Trump\u00a0and the U.S. intelligence agencies after the incoming president likened them to Nazis. In doing so, Pompeo never lost his access to\u00a0Trump, or experienced a mass revolt to his leadership like Tillerson faced at the State Department.<\/p>\n

\u201cTillerson’s ouster is a sign of continued turbulence in U.S. foreign policy,\u201d said Jessica Chen Weiss, a Cornell University professor. \u201cA potential silver lining is that the State Department will fare better under someone who has\u00a0Trump’s ear.\u201d<\/p>\n

Immediately, there were calls for Pompeo to abandon Tillerson’s plans to shrink the department and empower marginalized diplomats.<\/p>\n

While some opponents lambasted the former Kansas lawmaker for his posturing on a House panel that investigated Hillary Clinton and the 2012 Benghazi attack, some Democrats held out hope he could lead a State Department turnaround.<\/p>\n

Rep. Adam Schiff, a harsh critic of\u00a0Trump\u00a0and Tillerson, said Pomepo would be wise to let the State Department’s talent \u201cdo their jobs.\u201d Referencing the departure of many senior diplomats, Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee’s top Democrat, said Pompeo will \u201cneed to recruit and fill the many offices that have been left vacant.\u201d<\/p>\n

While Tillerson sought to reduce staffing at embassies and consulates abroad, and seemed to hoard many of the agency’s minutest decisions among a small group of advisers, Pompeo sent more spies to the field and tried to improve the CIA’s agility and speed by cutting bureaucratic red tape and moving decision-making down the chain of command.<\/p>\n

Pompeo said his goal as America’s spymaster was to create a culture that says: \u201cIf you are in a process and you’re not adding value, get out of the way.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pompeo and Tillerson navigated different paths with\u00a0Trump, too.<\/p>\n

While Tillerson survived a tumultuous year amid rampant speculation that the White House wanted him out, he was unable to use a much-touted alliance with Defence Secretary Jim Mattis to keep his job. Pompeo took a more direct approach, carefully cultivating\u00a0Trump\u00a0and even assuming the previously lower-level responsibility of delivering the daily presentation of intelligence to the president in the Oval Office.<\/p>\n

Bigger questions loom about Pompeo’s ability to counteract\u00a0Trump’s often unpredictable decision-making processes. For all of Tillerson’s bureaucratic stumbles, some of the president’s most bitter adversaries credited the ex-oilman with acting as an adult and serving with dignity even as\u00a0Trump\u00a0publicly humiliated him.<\/p>\n

And, as\u00a0Trump\u00a0noted Tuesday, he and Pompeo have a \u201csimilar thought process\u201d on the Iran deal, which\u00a0Trump\u00a0has threatened to abandon unless there are significant changes by May.<\/p>\n

Tillerson \u201chas been a poor advocate for the State Department, but he served as a Cabinet-level check on some of President\u00a0Trump’s worst impulses,\u201d said Thomas Countryman, one of the career diplomats who left in early 2017. Countryman, who was assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation, said if Pompeo \u201chas a disdain for diplomacy mirroring\u00a0Trump’s, it will be bad for the department and the country.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON – Mike Pompeo’s hawkish instincts may seem at odds with traditional diplomatic norms. But after 14 demoralizing months of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":156404,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,16],"tags":[33301,48167,25077,48166],"class_list":["post-156403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-news","tag-mike-pompeo","tag-president-trump","tag-rep-adam-schiff","tag-sen-lindsey-graham","mauthors-matthew-lee","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156403\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/156404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}