{"id":155864,"date":"2018-03-09T23:03:32","date_gmt":"2018-03-10T04:03:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=155864"},"modified":"2018-03-09T23:03:32","modified_gmt":"2018-03-10T04:03:32","slug":"notley-threat-to-cut-off-oil-to-others-not-a-new-tactic-for-alberta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/09\/notley-threat-to-cut-off-oil-to-others-not-a-new-tactic-for-alberta\/","title":{"rendered":"Notley threat to cut off oil to others not a new tactic for Alberta"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_155865\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-155865\" style=\"width: 802px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Rachel-Notley.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-155865\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Rachel-Notley.jpg\" alt=\"Alberta Premier Rachel Notley's threat to reduce oil shipments to other provinces, the latest salvo in a recent pipeline dispute with British Columbia, carries on a provincial tradition of using its natural resources to reinforce its political positions. (Photo: Rachel Notley\/Facebook)\" width=\"802\" height=\"960\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Rachel-Notley.jpg 802w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Rachel-Notley-251x300.jpg 251w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Rachel-Notley-768x919.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 802px) 100vw, 802px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-155865\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Alberta Premier Rachel Notley&#8217;s threat to reduce oil shipments to other provinces, the latest salvo in a recent pipeline dispute with British Columbia, carries on a provincial tradition of using its natural resources to reinforce its political positions. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rachelnotley\/photos\/a.10150148975431427.338765.113707256426\/10155910800896427\/?type=3&amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rachelnotley\/\">Rachel Notley\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>CALGARY \u2014 Alberta Premier Rachel Notley&#8217;s threat to reduce oil shipments to other provinces, the latest salvo in a recent pipeline dispute with British Columbia, carries on a provincial tradition of using its natural resources to reinforce its political positions.<\/p>\n<p>The energy-rich province has used its oil and gas exports as leverage at least three times in the past to win arguments with other levels of government, oilpatch historian and author David Finch said Friday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBecause the &#8230; premier represents the people of Alberta as owners of the natural resource, there&#8217;s always more at stake on these issues and the Alberta perspective is always different than the Ottawa perspective,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Notley on Thursday said she would, if pushed, replicate the actions of former premier Peter Lougheed who in 1980-81 reduced oil flows over several months and cancelled two oilsands developments after the federal Liberals brought in the national energy program with its price controls, new taxes and revenue sharing.<\/p>\n<p>Finch said ex-premier Ernest Manning \u201cflexed his muscles\u201d and sent a shipment of natural gas to Montana in 1951 to assert the province&#8217;s right to control its exports. And then-Alberta energy minister Don Getty reduced natural gas shipments to Ontario in 1975 to protest federal policies he felt were discouraging establishing a petrochemical industry in the West.<\/p>\n<p>Alberta has been locked in an inter-provincial dispute with its western neighbour over the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. It became more heated earlier this year when B.C. said it would not allow increased oil flow until more research is completed on pipeline safety and spill response \u2014 B.C. backed down after Alberta suspended imports of B.C. wine.<\/p>\n<p>The Alberta government still has the legal right to restrict exports of oil and gas by withholding \u201cremoval permits,\u201d said Bob Skinner, executive fellow with the School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary, whose career has included stints in the federal energy department, industry and academia.<\/p>\n<p>However, he thinks there&#8217;s a \u201cvery low chance\u201d that Notley will actually implement export cuts because her threat echoes a previous suggestion by Opposition United Conservative Leader Jason Kenney, who could be the next premier.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe does not have to do it because what she&#8217;s done is take an arrow from the quiver of Jason Kenney, so the signal to British Columbia and Premier (John) Horgan is, &#8216;If you think I&#8217;m a toughie, just you wait. I&#8217;m offering you a basis for negotiation. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll get that if somebody else is here.\u201d&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Prime Minister Justin\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0said Friday that the Alberta-B.C. dispute over Kinder Morgan&#8217;s Trans Mountain expansion plans isn&#8217;t the first time provinces have disagreed on a project, adding that it&#8217;s important the federal government show leadership now.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat I have been very clear about is that this project is in the national interest and it will get built,\u201d\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0said in Regina.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0government approved the Kinder Morgan project in 2016, but the pipeline has since faced permit fights and challenges from the B.C. government. The $7.9-billion expansion would triple the amount of Alberta crude going from Edmonton to the port in Burnaby, B.C.<\/p>\n<p>Any reduction in shipments through the existing Trans Mountain line would likely affect operations of the 55,000-barrel-per-day Burnaby, B.C., refinery owned by Alberta-based Parkland Fuel Corp., which bought it from Chevron in November.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are reaching out to both the Alberta and British Columbia governments to discuss this issue. We hope that they can resolve this issue in a way that is beneficial to Canada, and both provincial economies,\u201d said Parkland spokeswoman Annie Cuerrier on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAny measure that restricts the supply of oil to British Columbia would be negative for both economies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Parkland&#8217;s Burnaby refinery is currently down for maintenance, which is already putting the squeeze on drivers in B.C., where gas prices spiked as high as $1.50 per litre this week.<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors said in a statement Friday it supports Notley&#8217;s move.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAn ongoing trade conflict with B.C. is not a desirable outcome for anyone, but tidewater access for Canadian crude products is just too important an issue to back down from,\u201d said CAODC president Mark Scholz.<\/p>\n<p>Spokeswoman Chelsie Klassen said the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers opposes trade barriers between provinces and encouraged \u201ccollaboration between governments rather than divisiveness.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Environmentalists, meanwhile, said they were disappointed with the Notley&#8217;s brinkmanship.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt feels like a betrayal, it feels like they&#8217;re really going against the values of a lot of people who supported them,\u201d said Claire Edwards, 23, an Albertan who said she helped with Notley&#8217;s election campaign.<\/p>\n<p>She was reached in Vancouver where she plans to take part in a pipeline protest march on Saturday holding a huge banner that reads \u201cAlbertans against Kinder Morgan.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She added it seems like the oil and gas industry is in charge in Alberta no matter which party is in power.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CALGARY \u2014 Alberta Premier Rachel Notley&#8217;s threat to reduce oil shipments to other provinces, the latest salvo in a recent &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":155865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[1771,13968,349],"class_list":["post-155864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-alberta","tag-alberta-premier-rachel-notley","tag-oil","mauthors-dan-healing","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155864\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}