{"id":154976,"date":"2018-03-02T02:24:11","date_gmt":"2018-03-02T07:24:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=154976"},"modified":"2018-03-02T02:24:11","modified_gmt":"2018-03-02T07:24:11","slug":"5324-barangays-drug-free-pdea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/03\/02\/5324-barangays-drug-free-pdea\/","title":{"rendered":"5,324 barangays drug-free: PDEA"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\u201cPDEA<\/a>
\u201cPDEA has committed itself to clear the remaining 24,424 drug-affected barangays nationwide by 2022. These barangays represent 58.10 percent out of 42,036 barangays in the country that are still plagued by the drug menace,\u201d PDEA Director General Aaron Aquino said. (Photo: PDEA)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n


\nMANILA<\/strong>\u00a0— The Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) has reported that 5,324 out of 42,036 or 12.6 percent barangays in the country have been cleared of drugs in line with the government\u2019s ongoing anti-narcotics campaign.<\/p>\n

PDEA Director General Aaron Aquino said the report covers the period July 2016 to December 2017.<\/p>\n

Aquino said for 2018, the agency targets to clear 7,328 barangays from illegal drugs, or a projected average of 617 barangays per month.<\/p>\n

\u201cPDEA has committed itself to clear the remaining 24,424 drug-affected barangays nationwide by 2022. These barangays represent 58.10 percent out of 42,036 barangays in the country that are still plagued by the drug menace,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cPDEA is setting the bar high. We intend to clear an average of 6,000 drug-affected barangays every year for the next four years. If we can sustain the pace, we can rid the country\u2019s drug problem by 2022 and maintain the drug-free status,\u201d Aquino said.<\/p>\n

Of the 24,424 drug-affected barangays, 15,290 are classified as slightly affected, 9,089 are moderately affected, while 45 are seriously affected.<\/p>\n

Barangays are considered slightly affected if there is a reported presence of drug user(s); moderately affected if there is a reported presence of drug pusher\/s and\/or user\/s; and seriously affected if there is a reported presence of any of the following: clandestine drug laboratory, warehouse, marijuana plantation, and drug den\/\u201dtiangge\u201d, drug trafficking or smuggling activities, and drug personalities such as users, pushers, financiers, protectors, cultivators, and manufacturers.<\/p>\n

The National Capital Region has the highest rate of barangay drug-affectation with 95.37 percent, followed by Region 9 (Zamboanga Peninsula) at 93.47 percent, Region 7 (Central Visayas) at 88.78 percent, Region 3 (Central Luzon) at 84.01 percent, and Region 8 (Caraga) at 82.38 percent. The regions least affected by illegal drugs are Region 5 (Bicol) at 16.59 percent, and the Cordillera Administrative Region at 0.68 percent.<\/p>\n

\u201cPDEA is faced with many challenges. Foremost is thousands of barangays have yet to activate its Barangay Anti-Drug Abuse Council (BADAC) while almost the same rate of local government units have inactive municipal and local anti-drug abuse councils,” Aquino added.<\/p>\n

He said PDEA has tapped the Philippine National Police, local health and social welfare offices in the ongoing anti-drugs campaign.
\n\u201cWe are happy that the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), particularly the Office of Assistant Secretary Rico Judge Echiverri, is in constant cooperation with us and committed that they will help in the activation of all BADACs and ADACs in the whole country,\u201d Aquino said.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the 5,324 barangays have reached drug-cleared status after the issuance of a certification by members of the Oversight Committee on Barangay Drug-Clearing Program.
\nThe Oversight Committee, which is chaired by PDEA, is composed of provincial representatives of the DILG, PNP, Department of Health, and local government units.<\/p>\n

Before declaring that a barangay is free from illegal drug activities, the committee must convene and validate the non-availability of drug supply in the area and the absence of drug transit activity, clandestine drug laboratory and chemical warehouse, marijuana cultivation site, drug den, drug pusher and user.<\/p>\n

\u201cOnce cleared, we must ensure that drug-free barangays will maintain their status. All our efforts will go to waste if we allow the resurgence of illegal drug activities in these areas,\u201d Aquino said.<\/p>\n

\u201cTo accelerate efforts against the proliferation of illegal drugs in drug-affected barangays, the government has adopted an integrated approach in securing the assistance of the local government units in drug-clearing operations,\u201d the PDEA chief said, citing Dangerous Drugs Board Regulation No. 3 Series of 2017, otherwise known as \u201cStrengthening the Implementation of the Barangay Drug-Clearing Program\u201d.\u00a0(PNA)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0— The Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) has reported that 5,324 out of 42,036 or 12.6 percent barangays in the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":123607,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[27394,18677,18492,12302],"class_list":["post-154976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-aaron-aquino","tag-department-of-the-interior-and-local-government-dilg","tag-national-capital-region","tag-philippine-drug-enforcement-agency","mauthors-christopher-lloyd-caliwan","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154976\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/123607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}