{"id":154019,"date":"2018-02-23T21:10:21","date_gmt":"2018-02-24T02:10:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=154019"},"modified":"2018-02-23T21:10:22","modified_gmt":"2018-02-24T02:10:22","slug":"lawyers-want-deputy-ombudsman-bodily-removed-from-office","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/23\/lawyers-want-deputy-ombudsman-bodily-removed-from-office\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyers want deputy ombudsman \u2018bodily removed&#8217; from office"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; A group of lawyers on Friday has asked the Office of the President (OP) to \u201cbodily or physically\u201d remove Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur Carandang from office or restrain him from exercising his duty for refusing to serve his 90-day suspension.<\/p>\n<p>In a joint motion filed before the OP on February 23, lawyers Manuelito Luna, Jacinto Paras, Glenn Chong and Eligio Mallari urged the OP to use \u201cnecessary and reasonable force\u201d to impose the preventive suspension versus Carandang.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cToday, we filed our joint motion before the Office of the President to remove, bodily or physically, Deputy Ombudsman Carandang from office because he has refused and continues to refuse to serve the 90-day preventive suspension,\u201d Luna said in an interview with Palace reporters.<\/p>\n<p>Paras said another reason for filing the joint motion was Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales\u2019 refusal to implement the OP\u2019s suspension order which she claims is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>Last January 29, Malacanang slapped Carandang with a 90-day preventive suspension for grave misconduct and grave dishonesty after he made public the bank documents of President Rodrigo Duterte and his family.<\/p>\n<p>Paras said Carandang has \u201cdivulged falsely\u201d the purported bank records which the Overall Deputy Ombudsman had claimed were taken from the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut later on it was denied by AMLC that the record were taken from AMLC,\u201d Paras told the media.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is respectfully prayed of the honorable office to cause respondent Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur H. Carandang to be bodily or physically remove from office or restrained from the exercise thereof (for a period of 90 days counted from date of actual suspension), through the use of necessary and reasonable force,&#8221; they stated in the joint motion.<\/p>\n<p>Since no temporary restraining order was issued by the court, Duterte can order enforcement agencies like the Philippine National Police to implement their joint motion to physically remove Carandang from office, according to the complainants.<\/p>\n<p>They also suggested that \u201ccontingents of enforcers may be stationed\u201d at the Office of the Ombudsman premises to prevent Carandang \u201cfrom returning to his office and make a mockery of the process.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Carandang led the investigation into Dutertes\u2019 alleged ill-gotten wealth.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; A group of lawyers on Friday has asked the Office of the President (OP) to \u201cbodily or physically\u201d remove &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":114184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[25929],"class_list":["post-154019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-melchor-arthur-carandang","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154019\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/114184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}