{"id":153785,"date":"2018-02-22T03:20:57","date_gmt":"2018-02-22T08:20:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=153785"},"modified":"2018-02-22T03:20:57","modified_gmt":"2018-02-22T08:20:57","slug":"palace-duterte-is-not-an-autocrat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/22\/palace-duterte-is-not-an-autocrat\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace: Duterte is not an autocrat"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_153843\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-153843\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-153843\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__.jpg\" alt=\"Roque noted that the President is a lawyer and &quot;knows the law.&quot; &quot;He wants to uphold the rule of law. He knows about the bill of rights.\u201d.( ACE MORANDANTE\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Duterte__-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-153843\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Roque noted that the President is a lawyer and &#8220;knows the law.&#8221; &#8220;He wants to uphold the rule of law. He knows about the bill of rights.\u201d.( ACE MORANDANTE\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>After intelligence agencies in the United States (US) tagged the Chief Executive as a \u201cthreat to democracy and human rights,\u201d Malaca\u00f1ang defended that the President is not an autocrat, saying that the intelligence community\u2019s assessment is \u201cmyopic and speculative at best.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>President Rodrigo Roa Duterte has attracted several international human rights critics for his campaign to eradicate illegal drugs, but this time 16 intelligence agencies in the US including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) listed the Philippine president as a threat to democracy and human rights in a Worldwide Threat Assessment report on February 13.<\/p>\n<p>(Read:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/21\/cia-15-other-us-intel-agencies-say-duterte-is-threat-to-democracy\/\">CIA, 15 other US intel agencies say Duterte is \u2018threat\u2019 to democracy<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe view this declaration from no less than the intelligence department of the United States with some concern,\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, Jr. earlier said in an interview with DZMM radio.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement, he added, \u201cFor one, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte is no autocrat or has autocratic tendencies. He adheres to the rule of law and remains loyal to the constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Roque noted that the President is a lawyer and &#8220;knows the law.&#8221; &#8220;He wants to uphold the rule of law. He knows about the bill of rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The report read, \u201cIn the Philippines, President Duterte will continue to wage his signature campaign against drugs, corruption, and crime. Duterte has suggested he could suspend the Constitution, declare a \u2018revolutionary government,\u2019 and impose nationwide martial law. His declaration of martial law in Mindanao, responding to the ISIS-inspired siege of Marawi City, has been extended through the end of 2018.<\/p>\n<p>Roque addressed each of the elements in the report, firstly saying that autocracy is not prevalent, because the media in the country is still able to broadcast and print even fake news.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur judiciary and the courts are functioning as usual. Our legislature remains independent and basic services are still being delivered,\u201d the spokesman added<\/p>\n<p>(Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/14\/marcos-ml-different-from-dutertes-ml-malacanan\/\">Marcos\u2019 ML different from Duterte\u2019s ML \u2013 Malaca\u00f1an<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Roque also defended that there was no revolutionary government or nationwide martial law which the report said Duterte might impose.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is therefore foolhardy not to tap social media as a tool when the technology exists for free,\u201d Roque said, this time addressing the report\u2019s citation of a Freedom House report which listed the Philippines as one of the 30 governments that used social media to combat criticism of the administration and spread agenda.<\/p>\n<p>He added, \u201cI don\u2019t know of any government in the free world which does not use the Internet and social media to promote its agenda. This is very true especially in the case of the US. This latest intelligence assessment is a classic case in point.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After intelligence agencies in the United States (US) tagged the Chief Executive as a \u201cthreat to democracy and human rights,\u201d &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":153843,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[29767,15359,47037,14387],"class_list":["post-153785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-central-intelligence-agency","tag-harry-roque","tag-intelligence-agencies","tag-rodrigo-roa-duterte","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}